<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google â€“ Monetizing the Worldâ€™s Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/01/google-monetizing-worlds-media.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/01/google-monetizing-worlds-media.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:31:31 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blog, Polls, Reviews en Feedback &#187; Internet grootheden grijpen naar de krant</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/01/google-monetizing-worlds-media.html/comment-page-1#comment-5680</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog, Polls, Reviews en Feedback &#187; Internet grootheden grijpen naar de krant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/wp_import/2006/01/google-%e2%80%93-monetizing-the-world%e2%80%99s-media.htm#comment-5680</guid>
		<description>[...] Meer informatie over adverteren in de dagbladen vindt u hier Achtergronden over het hoe en waarom van Google vindt u hier [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Meer informatie over adverteren in de dagbladen vindt u hier Achtergronden over het hoe en waarom van Google vindt u hier [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Dodge</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/01/google-monetizing-worlds-media.html/comment-page-1#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Dodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/wp_import/2006/01/google-%e2%80%93-monetizing-the-world%e2%80%99s-media.htm#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Advertising is the business, search is just one of the vehicles. There is a huge $250B market opportunity for  GYM (Google, Yahoo, Microsoft) in targeted advertising. For many years advertisers have spent billions of dollars without any clear measureable results.  Marketing people would lament &quot;Half of all advertising is a waste of money. We just don&#039;t know which 50% is wasteful, and which 50% really works&quot;.  The GYM advertising networks are changing that. Madison Avenue types are very nervous.
I wrote a blog on this topic today
http://dondodge.typepad.com/the_next_big_thing/2006/01/advertising_is_.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertising is the business, search is just one of the vehicles. There is a huge $250B market opportunity for  GYM (Google, Yahoo, Microsoft) in targeted advertising. For many years advertisers have spent billions of dollars without any clear measureable results.  Marketing people would lament &#8220;Half of all advertising is a waste of money. We just don&#8217;t know which 50% is wasteful, and which 50% really works&#8221;.  The GYM advertising networks are changing that. Madison Avenue types are very nervous.<br />
I wrote a blog on this topic today<br />
<a href="http://dondodge.typepad.com/the_next_big_thing/2006/01/advertising_is_.html" rel="nofollow">http://dondodge.typepad.com/the_next_big_thing/2006/01/advertising_is_ .html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeOK</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/01/google-monetizing-worlds-media.html/comment-page-1#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeOK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/wp_import/2006/01/google-%e2%80%93-monetizing-the-world%e2%80%99s-media.htm#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Hi Andy

   Thanks for those interesting points.  I too was thinking heavily about this move to radio.  I worry about the lasting impact of radio in general.  We are at a crossroads of technology right now with wireless and satelitte radio challenging this traditional media.  Let alone the addition of a TV signal on your cell.  With more and more options, radio is looking like the odd man out.  I feel that even if they succeed, they might not gain as much valuable insight into the offline media marketplace as hoped.  
   I do agree with you as well that if they can bring some sort of meaningful metrics to radio that the current radio execs will be shaking.  I remember 10 years ago when banner ads were being sold at prices like radio, TV and print.  With the internet&#039;s easily measured metrics, prices dropped with this additional information.  I have bought radio ads before for my retail store with very mixed results.  I concluded that the ROI was not great, even without the additional facts, and discountinued them.  
   I think this move by Google might make John Battelle&#039;s #2 prediction for 2006 come true http://battellemedia.com/archives/002149.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy</p>
<p>   Thanks for those interesting points.  I too was thinking heavily about this move to radio.  I worry about the lasting impact of radio in general.  We are at a crossroads of technology right now with wireless and satelitte radio challenging this traditional media.  Let alone the addition of a TV signal on your cell.  With more and more options, radio is looking like the odd man out.  I feel that even if they succeed, they might not gain as much valuable insight into the offline media marketplace as hoped.<br />
   I do agree with you as well that if they can bring some sort of meaningful metrics to radio that the current radio execs will be shaking.  I remember 10 years ago when banner ads were being sold at prices like radio, TV and print.  With the internet&#8217;s easily measured metrics, prices dropped with this additional information.  I have bought radio ads before for my retail store with very mixed results.  I concluded that the ROI was not great, even without the additional facts, and discountinued them.<br />
   I think this move by Google might make John Battelle&#8217;s #2 prediction for 2006 come true <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002149.php" rel="nofollow">http://battellemedia.com/archives/002149.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
