<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Relevance is Dead!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/03/search-relevance-is-dead.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/03/search-relevance-is-dead.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:38:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Romilly Cocking</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/03/search-relevance-is-dead.html/comment-page-1#comment-32909</link>
		<dc:creator>Romilly Cocking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/wp_import/2006/03/search-relevance-is-dead.htm#comment-32909</guid>
		<description>The results of the quoted survey say that the race for relevance is far from over. According to the survey, both Yahoo and Google&#039;s relevance scores are appalling.

The race has not yet started!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The results of the quoted survey say that the race for relevance is far from over. According to the survey, both Yahoo and Google&#8217;s relevance scores are appalling.</p>
<p>The race has not yet started!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vasiliy Kiryanov</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/03/search-relevance-is-dead.html/comment-page-1#comment-32775</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasiliy Kiryanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/wp_import/2006/03/search-relevance-is-dead.htm#comment-32775</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Andy, I have made few simple tests and got the same result. But I think we need to understand that relevance according to Search-engine and according to user are 2 diffirent things. Search-engines simply depends on algorithms but user want user-rated results. We have something close to it with StumbleUpon community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Andy, I have made few simple tests and got the same result. But I think we need to understand that relevance according to Search-engine and according to user are 2 diffirent things. Search-engines simply depends on algorithms but user want user-rated results. We have something close to it with StumbleUpon community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K T Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/03/search-relevance-is-dead.html/comment-page-1#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>K T Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/wp_import/2006/03/search-relevance-is-dead.htm#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Excellent post.  I would also suggest a follow up article analyzing the relative value of search engines to corporate websites vs. blogs.

My own research from watching statistics from Site Meter indicates that search engines are of little value to a blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post.  I would also suggest a follow up article analyzing the relative value of search engines to corporate websites vs. blogs.</p>
<p>My own research from watching statistics from Site Meter indicates that search engines are of little value to a blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
