<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNET Accepting Google Misinformation, Apply Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/06/cnet-accepting-google-misinformation-apply-now.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/06/cnet-accepting-google-misinformation-apply-now.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/06/cnet-accepting-google-misinformation-apply-now.html/comment-page-1#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/wp_import/2006/06/cnet-accepting-google-misinformation-apply-now.htm#comment-452</guid>
		<description>Personally I think Cnet should do more screening full stop, so much of their content seems to be poorly researched, poorly written, scaremongering rubbish.

The amount of tripe I&#039;ve seen written there is appaling.  We had several discussions a while ago at cre8asite where someone has posted a Cnet article suggesting one thing, and it&#039;s then been ripped apart for being completely innaccurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think Cnet should do more screening full stop, so much of their content seems to be poorly researched, poorly written, scaremongering rubbish.</p>
<p>The amount of tripe I&#8217;ve seen written there is appaling.  We had several discussions a while ago at cre8asite where someone has posted a Cnet article suggesting one thing, and it&#8217;s then been ripped apart for being completely innaccurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

