<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Norvig Challenges Berners-Lee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/07/googles-norvig-challenges-berners-lee.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/07/googles-norvig-challenges-berners-lee.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeOK</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/07/googles-norvig-challenges-berners-lee.html/comment-page-1#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeOK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/wp_import/2006/07/googles-norvig-challenges-berners-lee.htm#comment-567</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Peter on that discussion.  Webmaster&#039;s as a whole have a hard enough time meeting the basic standards the internet is imposing.  Things like HTML and meta tags are largely ignored by developers.  For this I do believe that Google must take at least partial responsiblity.  Andy, your &quot;laptop&quot; keyword experience show that internal site keywords make very little difference compared to outside links.  This type of ranking does not put the emphasis on site page optimization, which is where Tim is suggesting these additional &quot;tags&quot; be maintained.  
While agree with Tim on the big scale theory of what he is proposing, Peter is correct in saying that it is years away if ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Peter on that discussion.  Webmaster&#8217;s as a whole have a hard enough time meeting the basic standards the internet is imposing.  Things like HTML and meta tags are largely ignored by developers.  For this I do believe that Google must take at least partial responsiblity.  Andy, your &#8220;laptop&#8221; keyword experience show that internal site keywords make very little difference compared to outside links.  This type of ranking does not put the emphasis on site page optimization, which is where Tim is suggesting these additional &#8220;tags&#8221; be maintained.<br />
While agree with Tim on the big scale theory of what he is proposing, Peter is correct in saying that it is years away if ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

