<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adwords Optimizer Offers Automated Tinkering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/08/adwords-optimizer-offers-automated-tinkering.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/08/adwords-optimizer-offers-automated-tinkering.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/08/adwords-optimizer-offers-automated-tinkering.html/comment-page-1#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/wp_import/2006/08/adwords-optimizer-offers-automated-tinkering.htm#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Yikes, that&#039;s not a good thing. Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes, that&#8217;s not a good thing. Thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EGM</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/08/adwords-optimizer-offers-automated-tinkering.html/comment-page-1#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>EGM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/wp_import/2006/08/adwords-optimizer-offers-automated-tinkering.htm#comment-651</guid>
		<description>OK Andy - I&#039;ve been playing around with this tool for several weeks now. While it does exactly what it advertises, there is a pretty big potential weakness in its use. The program only looks at click-through rate (CTR) and completely ignores conversion rate (if you have conversion tracking set up, of course).

Here is a real situation I encountered:

&quot;Winning Ad&quot;
CTR: 3.76%
Conversion rate: 3.7%
Cost per conversion: $74.30

&quot;Losing Ad&quot;
CTR: 1.31%
Conversion Rate: 25.0%
Cost per conversion: $9.74

Digging into the numbers, what you find is that the &quot;winning ad&quot; only had one converter and the &quot;losing ad&quot; had 4 converters (this campaign has only been active for a short time and is extremely narrowly focused so the low absolute number of converters is to be expected).

If I were to go with this program&#039;s suggestions blindly, I&#039;d turn off the ad that is generating more actual customers. The AdWords Optimizer only looks at clicks and that would seem to be its major limitation.

I&#039;d love to see them upgrade the tool to integrate conversion data, though I&#039;m sure that it would be a trickier algorithm.

That&#039;s my two cents, since you asked. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK Andy &#8211; I&#8217;ve been playing around with this tool for several weeks now. While it does exactly what it advertises, there is a pretty big potential weakness in its use. The program only looks at click-through rate (CTR) and completely ignores conversion rate (if you have conversion tracking set up, of course).</p>
<p>Here is a real situation I encountered:</p>
<p>&#8220;Winning Ad&#8221;<br />
CTR: 3.76%<br />
Conversion rate: 3.7%<br />
Cost per conversion: $74.30</p>
<p>&#8220;Losing Ad&#8221;<br />
CTR: 1.31%<br />
Conversion Rate: 25.0%<br />
Cost per conversion: $9.74</p>
<p>Digging into the numbers, what you find is that the &#8220;winning ad&#8221; only had one converter and the &#8220;losing ad&#8221; had 4 converters (this campaign has only been active for a short time and is extremely narrowly focused so the low absolute number of converters is to be expected).</p>
<p>If I were to go with this program&#8217;s suggestions blindly, I&#8217;d turn off the ad that is generating more actual customers. The AdWords Optimizer only looks at clicks and that would seem to be its major limitation.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see them upgrade the tool to integrate conversion data, though I&#8217;m sure that it would be a trickier algorithm.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my two cents, since you asked. <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

