<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Claims Click Fraud is Less than 10%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-claims-click-fraud-is-less-than-10.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-claims-click-fraud-is-less-than-10.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchEngineSoup &#187; Blog Archive &#187; History of Click Fraud Recapped, so Far&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-claims-click-fraud-is-less-than-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-21741</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchEngineSoup &#187; Blog Archive &#187; History of Click Fraud Recapped, so Far&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 20:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-claims-click-fraud-is-less-than-10.html#comment-21741</guid>
		<description>[...] November 1, 2006: Mr. Beal posted his article under &#8220;Google claims click fraud is less than 10%.&#8221;. Here&#8217;s an excerpt from his post; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] November 1, 2006: Mr. Beal posted his article under &#8220;Google claims click fraud is less than 10%.&#8221;. Here&#8217;s an excerpt from his post; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Googles Click Fraud Less Than 2%</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-claims-click-fraud-is-less-than-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-17557</link>
		<dc:creator>Googles Click Fraud Less Than 2%</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-claims-click-fraud-is-less-than-10.html#comment-17557</guid>
		<description>[...] Googles Click Fraud Less Than 2%  Back in November, Googleâ€™s business product manager for trust and safety, Shuman Ghosemajumder, declared that click fraud invalid clicks at Google was â€œon average is in the single digits, quarter over quarter.â€ I recently sat down with Ghosemajumder to discuss exactly how large of a problem click fraud is at Google. Whether intentional or not, he gave me access to information and shared data never before seen outside of    the walls of the Googleplex. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Googles Click Fraud Less Than 2%  Back in November, Googleâ€™s business product manager for trust and safety, Shuman Ghosemajumder, declared that click fraud invalid clicks at Google was â€œon average is in the single digits, quarter over quarter.â€ I recently sat down with Ghosemajumder to discuss exactly how large of a problem click fraud is at Google. Whether intentional or not, he gave me access to information and shared data never before seen outside of    the walls of the Googleplex. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google - Another email discussion &#171; Level 3. Uninterrupted.</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-claims-click-fraud-is-less-than-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-8647</link>
		<dc:creator>Google - Another email discussion &#171; Level 3. Uninterrupted.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 16:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-claims-click-fraud-is-less-than-10.html#comment-8647</guid>
		<description>[...] Google&#8217;s business product manager for trust and safety,  Shuman Ghosemajumder, declared that click fraud invalid clicks at Google was &#8220;on average is in the single digits, quarter over quarter.&#8221; I recently sat down with Ghosemajumder to discuss exactly how large of a problem click fraud is at Google. Whether intentional or not, he gave me access to information and shared data never before seen outside of the walls of the Googleplex.For those of you short on patience or time, here&#8217;s the revealing information gleaned from my conversation with Ghosemajumder: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google&#8217;s business product manager for trust and safety,  Shuman Ghosemajumder, declared that click fraud invalid clicks at Google was &#8220;on average is in the single digits, quarter over quarter.&#8221; I recently sat down with Ghosemajumder to discuss exactly how large of a problem click fraud is at Google. Whether intentional or not, he gave me access to information and shared data never before seen outside of the walls of the Googleplex.For those of you short on patience or time, here&#8217;s the revealing information gleaned from my conversation with Ghosemajumder: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morelinks4u.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thank you Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-claims-click-fraud-is-less-than-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-7975</link>
		<dc:creator>morelinks4u.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thank you Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-claims-click-fraud-is-less-than-10.html#comment-7975</guid>
		<description>[...] Back in November, Googleâ€™s business product manager for trust and safety, Shuman Ghosemajumder, declared that click fraud invalid clicks at Google was â€œon average is in the single digits, quarter over quarter.â€ I recently sat down with Ghosemajumder to discuss exactly how large of a problem click fraud is at Google. Whether intentional or not, he gave me access to information and shared data never before seen outside of the walls of the Googleplex. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Back in November, Googleâ€™s business product manager for trust and safety, Shuman Ghosemajumder, declared that click fraud invalid clicks at Google was â€œon average is in the single digits, quarter over quarter.â€ I recently sat down with Ghosemajumder to discuss exactly how large of a problem click fraud is at Google. Whether intentional or not, he gave me access to information and shared data never before seen outside of the walls of the Googleplex. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Googleâ€™s Click Fraud Rate is Less than 2% &#187; Dee&#8217;s-Planet! Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-claims-click-fraud-is-less-than-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-7526</link>
		<dc:creator>Googleâ€™s Click Fraud Rate is Less than 2% &#187; Dee&#8217;s-Planet! Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-claims-click-fraud-is-less-than-10.html#comment-7526</guid>
		<description>[...] Back in November, Google&#8217;s business product manager for trust and safety, Shuman Ghosemajumder, declared that&#160;click fraud invalid clicks at Google was &#8220;on average is in the single digits, quarter over quarter.&#8221; I recently sat down with Ghosemajumder to discuss exactly how large of a problem click fraud is at Google. Whether intentional or not, he gave me access to information and shared data never before seen outside of the walls of the Googleplex. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Back in November, Google&rsquo;s business product manager for trust and safety, Shuman Ghosemajumder, declared that&nbsp;click fraud invalid clicks at Google was &ldquo;on average is in the single digits, quarter over quarter.&rdquo; I recently sat down with Ghosemajumder to discuss exactly how large of a problem click fraud is at Google. Whether intentional or not, he gave me access to information and shared data never before seen outside of the walls of the Googleplex. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ammon</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-claims-click-fraud-is-less-than-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-2232</link>
		<dc:creator>Ammon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-claims-click-fraud-is-less-than-10.html#comment-2232</guid>
		<description>click fraud at Google is on average in single digits quarter on quarter.

So, if the click fraud on the true long tail is near zero, then Mr Ghosemajumder has basically confirmed  that for the high-cost, most competitive, &#039;head terms&#039; it must indeed be likely to be 20% or higher.

It is rare to see anyone from Google (other than the CEO) make such a complete mess of public relations.  To me, this reads as basically admitting that certain search terms are almost certain to have click-fraud in excess of 20%, otherwise the average across the entire system should be in percentile points, not single digits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>click fraud at Google is on average in single digits quarter on quarter.</p>
<p>So, if the click fraud on the true long tail is near zero, then Mr Ghosemajumder has basically confirmed  that for the high-cost, most competitive, &#8216;head terms&#8217; it must indeed be likely to be 20% or higher.</p>
<p>It is rare to see anyone from Google (other than the CEO) make such a complete mess of public relations.  To me, this reads as basically admitting that certain search terms are almost certain to have click-fraud in excess of 20%, otherwise the average across the entire system should be in percentile points, not single digits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

