<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Holds $200m to Defend YouTube Copyright Claims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-holds-200m-to-defend-youtube-copyright-claims.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-holds-200m-to-defend-youtube-copyright-claims.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bumpyrtle &#187; Late breaking news</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-holds-200m-to-defend-youtube-copyright-claims.html/comment-page-1#comment-4016</link>
		<dc:creator>Bumpyrtle &#187; Late breaking news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-holds-200m-to-defend-youtube-copyright-claims.html#comment-4016</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-holds-200m-to-defend-youtube-copyright-claims.html/comment-page-1#comment-3858</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-holds-200m-to-defend-youtube-copyright-claims.html#comment-3858</guid>
		<description>What they need to do is put aside monies for those who own domain names and copyrights. Google has gotten bold enough to sell sponsored links on a keyword domain search (ie if you search for spyware.com you&#039;ll see many websites who pay to be @ the top of that page. We should get a piece of that action too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What they need to do is put aside monies for those who own domain names and copyrights. Google has gotten bold enough to sell sponsored links on a keyword domain search (ie if you search for spyware.com you&#8217;ll see many websites who pay to be @ the top of that page. We should get a piece of that action too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

