<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Merges Blog Search with General Search Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-merges-blog-search-with-general-search-results.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-merges-blog-search-with-general-search-results.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-merges-blog-search-with-general-search-results.html/comment-page-1#comment-5255</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-merges-blog-search-with-general-search-results.html#comment-5255</guid>
		<description>What they really should do is give us a one click way to view blog results for the search we just did (like you can for news...).  Plus they need to improve blogsearch itself.  But even as it is I find it useful at times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What they really should do is give us a one click way to view blog results for the search we just did (like you can for news&#8230;).  Plus they need to improve blogsearch itself.  But even as it is I find it useful at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Fraser</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-merges-blog-search-with-general-search-results.html/comment-page-1#comment-5238</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fraser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-merges-blog-search-with-general-search-results.html#comment-5238</guid>
		<description>Silly me, I didn&#039;t know that I could enlarge Andy Boyd&#039;s screenshots.

Nope. I haven&#039;t seen that specific section for blog posts. Funny thing. Search &quot;tea&quot; or &quot;FSB&quot; and the specific sections for blog posts (as seen in the screenshots) are gone; Google experimentation.

Personally, I cannot see any benefit for a specific section except that Google is attempting to justify its Blog Search Service by including it into the main index results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly me, I didn&#8217;t know that I could enlarge Andy Boyd&#8217;s screenshots.</p>
<p>Nope. I haven&#8217;t seen that specific section for blog posts. Funny thing. Search &#8220;tea&#8221; or &#8220;FSB&#8221; and the specific sections for blog posts (as seen in the screenshots) are gone; Google experimentation.</p>
<p>Personally, I cannot see any benefit for a specific section except that Google is attempting to justify its Blog Search Service by including it into the main index results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-merges-blog-search-with-general-search-results.html/comment-page-1#comment-5225</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-merges-blog-search-with-general-search-results.html#comment-5225</guid>
		<description>Hi Sean, Google has always included blogs in its main index, but we are now seeing specific section that say &quot;Blog posts about x&quot;. Have you see that before?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sean, Google has always included blogs in its main index, but we are now seeing specific section that say &#8220;Blog posts about x&#8221;. Have you see that before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Fraser</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-merges-blog-search-with-general-search-results.html/comment-page-1#comment-5204</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fraser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 06:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-merges-blog-search-with-general-search-results.html#comment-5204</guid>
		<description>Google has been showing blog posts for months. It&#039;s dependent on traffic and topic. I had an article about XHTML several months ago that showed at number two while it was getting traffic; it&#039;s since dropped. However, most of the search results for XHTML, web standards and the like are - still - blog posts. It&#039;s subject driven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has been showing blog posts for months. It&#8217;s dependent on traffic and topic. I had an article about XHTML several months ago that showed at number two while it was getting traffic; it&#8217;s since dropped. However, most of the search results for XHTML, web standards and the like are &#8211; still &#8211; blog posts. It&#8217;s subject driven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shimon Sandler</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-merges-blog-search-with-general-search-results.html/comment-page-1#comment-5140</link>
		<dc:creator>Shimon Sandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/google-merges-blog-search-with-general-search-results.html#comment-5140</guid>
		<description>Finally.  It&#039;s about time they incorporated blog posts into their Web Search.  Maybe Y! will follow the lead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally.  It&#8217;s about time they incorporated blog posts into their Web Search.  Maybe Y! will follow the lead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

