Comments on: Avoiding Google’s Duplicate Filter When Syndicating Your Blog http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/avoiding-googles-dupilicate-filter-when-syndicating-your-blog.html Internet Marketing News Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Michael Cruz http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/avoiding-googles-dupilicate-filter-when-syndicating-your-blog.html/comment-page-1#comment-54176 Michael Cruz Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:30:09 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/avoiding-googles-dupilicate-filter-when-syndicating-your-blog.html#comment-54176 Thank your article is very helpful. I've noticed plenty of members of PLR organizations that simply post up articles not realizing that this could cause duplication issues. Keep up the good work! Thank your article is very helpful. I’ve noticed plenty of members of PLR organizations that simply post up articles not realizing that this could cause duplication issues. Keep up the good work!

]]> By: Съвети за успешен афилиейт маркетинг « SEO Блогът на Lilacor http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/avoiding-googles-dupilicate-filter-when-syndicating-your-blog.html/comment-page-1#comment-53479 Съвети за успешен афилиейт маркетинг « SEO Блогът на Lilacor Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:01:07 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/avoiding-googles-dupilicate-filter-when-syndicating-your-blog.html#comment-53479 [...] големина или цвят, тогава те могат да попаднат в duplicate филтъра на Google (това става, когато страниците са твърде [...] [...] големина или цвят, тогава те могат да попаднат в duplicate филтъра на Google (това става, когато страниците са твърде [...]

]]> By: Dr Altaf http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/avoiding-googles-dupilicate-filter-when-syndicating-your-blog.html/comment-page-1#comment-42042 Dr Altaf Sun, 24 Feb 2008 05:00:17 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/avoiding-googles-dupilicate-filter-when-syndicating-your-blog.html#comment-42042 I saw in more than 2 places the exact identical content. Does it it matter? If the original content is edited with new words, para or addition or deletion of content, still would be treated as duplicate? As identical issues/subject may have similar content.How Google audits such content at what rate? I saw in more than 2 places the exact identical content. Does it it matter? If the original content is edited with new words, para or addition or deletion of content, still would be treated as duplicate? As identical issues/subject may have similar content.How Google audits such content at what rate?

]]> By: Timothy Ross http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/avoiding-googles-dupilicate-filter-when-syndicating-your-blog.html/comment-page-1#comment-21512 Timothy Ross Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:52:10 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/avoiding-googles-dupilicate-filter-when-syndicating-your-blog.html#comment-21512 I have spent many hours rewriting my links to be unique for google. I have to agree with Lola...the filters seem to be somewhat to strict. It seems like everytime I have created unique links I am hit with more duplicate ones. I have spent many hours rewriting my links to be unique for google. I have to agree with Lola…the filters seem to be somewhat to strict. It seems like everytime I have created unique links I am hit with more duplicate ones.

]]> By: kelvin newman http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/avoiding-googles-dupilicate-filter-when-syndicating-your-blog.html/comment-page-1#comment-9472 kelvin newman Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:12:44 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/avoiding-googles-dupilicate-filter-when-syndicating-your-blog.html#comment-9472 It's reassuring to know that provided the link back is there you'll be okay, though I have seen examples where if a high authority site syndicates a low authority site's article and appear much higher up the rankings, but thats not hugely surprising in the examples I'm thinking of. It’s reassuring to know that provided the link back is there you’ll be okay, though I have seen examples where if a high authority site syndicates a low authority site’s article and appear much higher up the rankings, but thats not hugely surprising in the examples I’m thinking of.

]]> By: Lucas McDonnell http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/avoiding-googles-dupilicate-filter-when-syndicating-your-blog.html/comment-page-1#comment-9200 Lucas McDonnell Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:56:03 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/avoiding-googles-dupilicate-filter-when-syndicating-your-blog.html#comment-9200 While I haven't experienced this particular issue, I have noticed that since switching to a new URL setting (where the URL names the pages instead of just providing a numbered URL) my pages show up twice in Google. Of course I set up redirects from the old pages to new pages, so I guess that's why. I wonder if there's a way to avoid this. While I haven’t experienced this particular issue, I have noticed that since switching to a new URL setting (where the URL names the pages instead of just providing a numbered URL) my pages show up twice in Google. Of course I set up redirects from the old pages to new pages, so I guess that’s why. I wonder if there’s a way to avoid this.

]]> By: Lola loves pictures http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/avoiding-googles-dupilicate-filter-when-syndicating-your-blog.html/comment-page-1#comment-9198 Lola loves pictures Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:44:50 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/avoiding-googles-dupilicate-filter-when-syndicating-your-blog.html#comment-9198 Dupe content filters are too strict at google. I think google is going too far by forcing people to pease them with unique content on one static url that has to have a very unicue title. Thank you for sharing this stroy with me ! Dupe content filters are too strict at google.
I think google is going too far by forcing people to pease them with unique content on one static url that has to have a very unicue title.

Thank you for sharing this stroy with me !

]]>