<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exclusive: Google&#8217;s Click Fraud Rate is Less than 2%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Marketing 2006: Τα 102 σημαντικότερα γεγονότα της χρονιάς &#187; Το Βlog για τις Μηχανές Αναζήτησης</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-4#comment-67363</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Marketing 2006: Τα 102 σημαντικότερα γεγονότα της χρονιάς &#187; Το Βlog για τις Μηχανές Αναζήτησης</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 04:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-67363</guid>
		<description>[...] click fraud worries are overblown (9/8) despite the $90 million click fraud settlement (28/7) and Google’s claim that their click fraud rate is less than 2% (11/12). Διαβάστε το δικό μας [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] click fraud worries are overblown (9/8) despite the $90 million click fraud settlement (28/7) and Google’s claim that their click fraud rate is less than 2% (11/12). Διαβάστε το δικό μας [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 BIG Security Threats to Your Corporate Network &#171;</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-4#comment-63253</link>
		<dc:creator>10 BIG Security Threats to Your Corporate Network &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-63253</guid>
		<description>[...] weblog. While Google said in Dec 2006 that click fraud for their AdSense contextual ad network is less than 2 percent, some advertisers have much higher estimates. Whatever the actual figure, creating click fraud [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] weblog. While Google said in Dec 2006 that click fraud for their AdSense contextual ad network is less than 2 percent, some advertisers have much higher estimates. Whatever the actual figure, creating click fraud [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malson Mahoney</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-4#comment-62215</link>
		<dc:creator>Malson Mahoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 07:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-62215</guid>
		<description>This article is a couple of years old now, but I have not seen a tremendous improvement  in stopping click fraud.  The idea that every business has to watch out for itself reminds me of EBAY and the hands off policy catching fraudulent sellers.  Too much money involved for Google to make a change.  If it is truly 2% that still comes out to tens of millions in fraudulent clicks.  
The bottom line is businesses that use Google services still make money.  Enough to put up with fraudulent clicking I guess.  For them(google) to come out though and say they will not track IPs for a business is absolute bull.  They can instantly create a report on just about everything, but the ip of the machine that clicked through an ad...give me a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is a couple of years old now, but I have not seen a tremendous improvement  in stopping click fraud.  The idea that every business has to watch out for itself reminds me of EBAY and the hands off policy catching fraudulent sellers.  Too much money involved for Google to make a change.  If it is truly 2% that still comes out to tens of millions in fraudulent clicks.<br />
The bottom line is businesses that use Google services still make money.  Enough to put up with fraudulent clicking I guess.  For them(google) to come out though and say they will not track IPs for a business is absolute bull.  They can instantly create a report on just about everything, but the ip of the machine that clicked through an ad&#8230;give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cufflinks</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-4#comment-60725</link>
		<dc:creator>Cufflinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-60725</guid>
		<description>I have used google ads before and have often wondered how many of the click I paid for were in fact click fraud</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used google ads before and have often wondered how many of the click I paid for were in fact click fraud</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flat Sceen TV Mounts</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-4#comment-60723</link>
		<dc:creator>Flat Sceen TV Mounts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-60723</guid>
		<description>agf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flat Sceen TV Mounts</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-4#comment-60722</link>
		<dc:creator>Flat Sceen TV Mounts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-60722</guid>
		<description>test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Protect Yourself from Click Fraud&#160;&#124;&#160;BiggestLobster.com</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-4#comment-56683</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Protect Yourself from Click Fraud&#160;&#124;&#160;BiggestLobster.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-56683</guid>
		<description>[...] cli&#173;ck&#8221; ra&#173;tes&#173; for A&#173;d&#173;Word&#173;s&#173; were l&#173;ess than&#173; 2 per&#173;cen&#173;t. T&#173;his w&#173;as lat&#173;er clarif&#173;ied b&#173;y&#173; a p&#173;ost&#173; on&#173; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cli&#173;ck&#8221; ra&#173;tes&#173; for A&#173;d&#173;Word&#173;s&#173; were l&#173;ess than&#173; 2 per&#173;cen&#173;t. T&#173;his w&#173;as lat&#173;er clarif&#173;ied b&#173;y&#173; a p&#173;ost&#173; on&#173; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Protect Yourself from Click Fraud &#124; Search Engine Optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-4#comment-56680</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Protect Yourself from Click Fraud &#124; Search Engine Optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-56680</guid>
		<description>[...] figures above, Google claimed that their average &#8220;invalid click&#8221; rates for AdWords were less than 2 percent. This was later clarified by a post on their Inside AdWords blog stating that the actual figure was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] figures above, Google claimed that their average &#8220;invalid click&#8221; rates for AdWords were less than 2 percent. This was later clarified by a post on their Inside AdWords blog stating that the actual figure was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiteProNews: Webmaster News &#38; Resources &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to Protect Yourself from Click Fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-4#comment-56675</link>
		<dc:creator>SiteProNews: Webmaster News &#38; Resources &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to Protect Yourself from Click Fraud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-56675</guid>
		<description>[...] figures above, Google claimed that their average &#8220;invalid click&#8221; rates for AdWords were less than 2 percent. This was later clarified by a post on their Inside AdWords blog stating that the actual figure was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] figures above, Google claimed that their average &#8220;invalid click&#8221; rates for AdWords were less than 2 percent. This was later clarified by a post on their Inside AdWords blog stating that the actual figure was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levels of Poor Service</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-4#comment-56416</link>
		<dc:creator>Levels of Poor Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-56416</guid>
		<description>Hate to say it do you believe in the tooth fairy or free pizza and beer ?
Wherever money and schemers are together it does not take too long for ideas of the &quot;easy and softer way &quot; to arise and develop
Some even enjoy or prefer to earn their money this way
To put it another way - figures don&#039;t lie but liars figger

&lt;em&gt;Levels of Poor Service&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.yelp.com/biz/pizza-place-winnipeg-4#hrid:s6nsWop0I38HsLe8Fns-xQ&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pizza e. (1.0/5) on Yelp.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to say it do you believe in the tooth fairy or free pizza and beer ?<br />
Wherever money and schemers are together it does not take too long for ideas of the &#8220;easy and softer way &#8221; to arise and develop<br />
Some even enjoy or prefer to earn their money this way<br />
To put it another way &#8211; figures don&#8217;t lie but liars figger</p>
<p><em>Levels of Poor Service&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.yelp.com/biz/pizza-place-winnipeg-4#hrid:s6nsWop0I38HsLe8Fns-xQ' rel="nofollow">pizza e. (1.0/5) on Yelp.com</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prasad</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-3#comment-56259</link>
		<dc:creator>prasad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 08:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-56259</guid>
		<description>i think there some element of click fraud on google we had given www.tendertiger.com add on google we do received some invalid and dummy click
regards
prasad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think there some element of click fraud on google we had given www.tendertiger.com add on google we do received some invalid and dummy click<br />
regards<br />
prasad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metro Services Wpg</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-3#comment-53242</link>
		<dc:creator>Metro Services Wpg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-53242</guid>
		<description>lots of coloured graphs and charts that i do not understand
The simple answer to all of this &quot;Do you believe in the tooth fairy ?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lots of coloured graphs and charts that i do not understand<br />
The simple answer to all of this &#8220;Do you believe in the tooth fairy ?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flickr</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-3#comment-52824</link>
		<dc:creator>Flickr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-52824</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s only the invalid clicks they caught. From our experience, it&#039;s much higher and Google&#039;s customer service staff fight hard to deny any compensations or responsibilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s only the invalid clicks they caught. From our experience, it&#8217;s much higher and Google&#8217;s customer service staff fight hard to deny any compensations or responsibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Click Fraud a big problem? &#124; Semfire Search Engine Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-3#comment-52759</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Click Fraud a big problem? &#124; Semfire Search Engine Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 05:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-52759</guid>
		<description>[...] was a good thread in the High Rankings forum this week about click fraud. It came about after this report that Google claims the figures for invalid clicks are about 2% [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was a good thread in the High Rankings forum this week about click fraud. It came about after this report that Google claims the figures for invalid clicks are about 2% [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Click Fraud at 2% : GeckoandFly How To Money</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-3#comment-50038</link>
		<dc:creator>Click Fraud at 2% : GeckoandFly How To Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 02:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-50038</guid>
		<description>[...] says the click-fraud rate for their ads is 2% of invalid clicks. Should I believe them? I hope this is true, Google Adsense is a great source of income for many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] says the click-fraud rate for their ads is 2% of invalid clicks. Should I believe them? I hope this is true, Google Adsense is a great source of income for many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-3#comment-45163</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-45163</guid>
		<description>After we installed a tracking code in our web pages, we found that 75% of Google&#039;s clicks were frauds.
We got massive amount of clicks from different countries in hours that people sleep there!
Google placed our adds along with Sex ads and Tourist guides...(we make scientific instrumentation).
Within 24 hours after we complained, all of those clicks disappeard. That clearly shows that Google got a hand in those clicks.
Our monthly bill is now 75% lower with no effect on our sales.
Webmasters, don&#039;t let them cheat you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After we installed a tracking code in our web pages, we found that 75% of Google&#8217;s clicks were frauds.<br />
We got massive amount of clicks from different countries in hours that people sleep there!<br />
Google placed our adds along with Sex ads and Tourist guides&#8230;(we make scientific instrumentation).<br />
Within 24 hours after we complained, all of those clicks disappeard. That clearly shows that Google got a hand in those clicks.<br />
Our monthly bill is now 75% lower with no effect on our sales.<br />
Webmasters, don&#8217;t let them cheat you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Goodman</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-3#comment-42640</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Goodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 18:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-42640</guid>
		<description>Wow, that was scientific.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that was scientific.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-3#comment-42604</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-42604</guid>
		<description>Google Crick Fraud is 20-30% based on my own experience with adsense. Of course Google would say it is low. Does anyone actually believe Matt Cutts and Google&#039;s PR machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Crick Fraud is 20-30% based on my own experience with adsense. Of course Google would say it is low. Does anyone actually believe Matt Cutts and Google&#8217;s PR machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Selin</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-3#comment-41968</link>
		<dc:creator>Selin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-41968</guid>
		<description>Even so, 2% is still too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even so, 2% is still too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Longwell</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html/comment-page-3#comment-41909</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Longwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate-two-percent.html#comment-41909</guid>
		<description>As popularized by Mark Twain.  &quot;There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As popularized by Mark Twain.  &#8220;There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

