<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Matt Cutts Offers Feedback on Banned Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: laizeps reesnreget</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html/comment-page-1#comment-6418</link>
		<dc:creator>laizeps reesnreget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 18:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html#comment-6418</guid>
		<description>just for the record: matt cutts stinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just for the record: matt cutts stinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DazzlinDonna</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html/comment-page-1#comment-6274</link>
		<dc:creator>DazzlinDonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html#comment-6274</guid>
		<description>And it&#039;s not just penalties and bans that should be dealt with, but other types of problems as well.  For instance, I recently had a site lose all its rankings because of a canonical issue (one link pointing index.cfm instead of the root).  Luckily, I was able to figure out that this was the problem, find the link, and fix it.  It still took several weeks for Google to return my rankings, however.  If I were an ordinary webmaster, and not aware of canonical issues, I might never have caught this.  Webmaster Console didn&#039;t tell me.  I didn&#039;t receive any emails.  Clearly, this is the kind of thing that would benefit webmasters, since it obviously has nothing to do with spamming or intentional shenanigans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it&#8217;s not just penalties and bans that should be dealt with, but other types of problems as well.  For instance, I recently had a site lose all its rankings because of a canonical issue (one link pointing index.cfm instead of the root).  Luckily, I was able to figure out that this was the problem, find the link, and fix it.  It still took several weeks for Google to return my rankings, however.  If I were an ordinary webmaster, and not aware of canonical issues, I might never have caught this.  Webmaster Console didn&#8217;t tell me.  I didn&#8217;t receive any emails.  Clearly, this is the kind of thing that would benefit webmasters, since it obviously has nothing to do with spamming or intentional shenanigans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html/comment-page-1#comment-6272</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html#comment-6272</guid>
		<description>Did you expect anything different than that from Matt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you expect anything different than that from Matt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html/comment-page-1#comment-6271</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html#comment-6271</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right Peter, no way to tell. Although even in Matt&#039;s example, he used a site where the site owner didn&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Peter, no way to tell. Although even in Matt&#8217;s example, he used a site where the site owner didn&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html/comment-page-1#comment-6264</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html#comment-6264</guid>
		<description>I would argue more that why should Google expend the effort rather than if it would be telling them something they didn&#039;t already know.  And, I do doubt that what you say about the &quot;majority&quot; of sites getting kicked out had no clue.  No way either of us could prove either way, so no sense arguing that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would argue more that why should Google expend the effort rather than if it would be telling them something they didn&#8217;t already know.  And, I do doubt that what you say about the &#8220;majority&#8221; of sites getting kicked out had no clue.  No way either of us could prove either way, so no sense arguing that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html/comment-page-1#comment-6263</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 18:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html#comment-6263</guid>
		<description>If the blackhats know they&#039;re playing with fire, they&#039;ll have an understanding already of what they did that got them booted. Alerting them, won&#039;t change that. 

It&#039;s like those people that get concerned with CNN explains how a terrorist could build a bomb - some people freak out that CNN just gave the terrosist a blueprint - but the terrorists already know how to do it.

The vast majority of sites that are kicked-out, never had a clue they were doing something that was a no-no. Remember, not everyone knows what Google&#039;s guidelines are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the blackhats know they&#8217;re playing with fire, they&#8217;ll have an understanding already of what they did that got them booted. Alerting them, won&#8217;t change that. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s like those people that get concerned with CNN explains how a terrorist could build a bomb &#8211; some people freak out that CNN just gave the terrosist a blueprint &#8211; but the terrorists already know how to do it.</p>
<p>The vast majority of sites that are kicked-out, never had a clue they were doing something that was a no-no. Remember, not everyone knows what Google&#8217;s guidelines are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html/comment-page-1#comment-6257</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 18:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/googles-matt-cutts-offers-feedback-on-banned-site.html#comment-6257</guid>
		<description>Why should they notify EVERY webmaster?  I think that in many cases where they ban a site, it&#039;s obvious that the webmaster knew exactly what they were doing and understood the risk involved.  Why would Google bother sending notices to the hardcore blackhats?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should they notify EVERY webmaster?  I think that in many cases where they ban a site, it&#8217;s obvious that the webmaster knew exactly what they were doing and understood the risk involved.  Why would Google bother sending notices to the hardcore blackhats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

