Comments on: Campaign to Reduce Wikipedia’s PageRank to Zero http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html Internet Marketing News Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ถ่ายภาพแต่งงาน http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-74159 ถ่ายภาพแต่งงาน Tue, 26 May 2009 07:51:40 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-74159 great idea!highly useful.Thanks for the post. great idea!highly useful.Thanks for the post.

]]> By: แมวมอง http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-73788 แมวมอง Tue, 19 May 2009 04:01:27 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-73788 That's an interesting proposition... It's useful. Thanks. That's an interesting proposition… It's useful. Thanks.

]]> By: Cash lenen http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-67422 Cash lenen Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:45:37 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-67422 It's about time Google stopped with the whole PR system anyway since it seems to be deprecated more and more. It’s about time Google stopped with the whole PR system anyway since it seems to be deprecated more and more.

]]> By: Klein bedrag lenen http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-59568 Klein bedrag lenen Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:58:19 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-59568 This is fun to some extent but still, what's the point? It obviously will not work, as you mention yourself. If you don't mind, I'll spend my scarce time reading your blog :-) This is fun to some extent but still, what’s the point? It obviously will not work, as you mention yourself. If you don’t mind, I’ll spend my scarce time reading your blog :-)

]]> By: netsight http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-59435 netsight Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:19:39 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-59435 My personal belief is to drop the page rank system altogether. Look what it's doing to the internet. it creates spammers, it creates an absence of other sites with more relevant content to the viewer and it's exploited for the purpose to sell high PR sites (something that PR wasn't created to do!) Is there any alternative? My personal belief is to drop the page rank system altogether. Look what it’s doing to the internet. it creates spammers, it creates an absence of other sites with more relevant content to the viewer and it’s exploited for the purpose to sell high PR sites (something that PR wasn’t created to do!) Is there any alternative?

]]> By: randy http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-58528 randy Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:30:58 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-58528 Wikipedia is a phenomenal idea and event but anymore is for few viewers or participants. Most don't take and or have time to break out all the wikipedia language to get their content matters started and even for me it is user unfriendly. But for the point, simply stated, I forsee a mast heavy ship toppling under their own weight. They are at some point sooner than later going to run amuck also of disinformation and carry the stigma as deceiver, with information next unconnected to real issues and at last floundering on with appearance of a dead or fatally wounded dragon! View my wikipedia misnomer page - google up -wikipedia misnomer. Wikipedia is a phenomenal idea and event but anymore is for few viewers or participants. Most don’t take and or have time to break out all the wikipedia language to get their content matters started and even for me it is user unfriendly. But for the point, simply stated, I forsee a mast heavy ship toppling under their own weight. They are at some point sooner than later going to run amuck also of disinformation and carry the stigma as deceiver, with information next unconnected to real issues and at last floundering on with appearance of a dead or fatally wounded dragon! View my wikipedia misnomer page – google up -wikipedia misnomer.

]]> By: doorlopend krediet http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-57958 doorlopend krediet Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:37:08 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-57958 Somehow I got this feeling wikipedia doesn't care. They are so powerful now. I mean, how could you persuade other people to join you? I would take ages. Somehow I got this feeling wikipedia doesn’t care. They are so powerful now. I mean, how could you persuade other people to join you? I would take ages.

]]> By: vikas http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-54916 vikas Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:16:16 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-54916 oh...... wikipedia should allow this ... oh…… wikipedia should allow this …

]]> By: iPod Fan http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-54886 iPod Fan Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:41:59 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-54886 To begin with I thought this was a good move by Wikipedia as it will reduce the number of spammers dramatically. Then I looked at the wider picture and it seems that this was just the easiest and cheapest solution to a problem which should be solved in another way. Wikipedia should continue to reward the related sites containing useful information or information which was used to make the Wikipedia article in the first place. I believe they should have moderators to weed out the spam links and not punish the innocent. My 2 cents. John To begin with I thought this was a good move by Wikipedia as it will reduce the number of spammers dramatically. Then I looked at the wider picture and it seems that this was just the easiest and cheapest solution to a problem which should be solved in another way.

Wikipedia should continue to reward the related sites containing useful information or information which was used to make the Wikipedia article in the first place. I believe they should have moderators to weed out the spam links and not punish the innocent.

My 2 cents.
John

]]> By: vikas http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-54652 vikas Sun, 24 Aug 2008 07:03:45 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-54652 Really ?? I didnt thougth so Really ?? I didnt thougth so

]]> By: maroc annonces http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-54621 maroc annonces Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:36:32 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-54621 this article is nofollow ;) this article is nofollow ;)

]]> By: Niraj http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-54280 Niraj Sat, 16 Aug 2008 22:47:38 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-54280 Its really sad. But I think they did this to stop spamming Its really sad. But I think they did this to stop spamming

]]> By: tshirts http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-53491 tshirts Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:09:23 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-53491 I have noticed, though, that I do get far less results on a Google search pointing to Wikipedia these days than I used to get over a year ago. It seems as if, perhaps, this thing of yours worked or the NOFOLLOW hurt them more than they would care to admit. I guess they had to get rid of spammers, but there might have just been a need for better moderators instead of using NOFOLLOW. It's just not clear, yet, what NOFOLLOW does just yet... I have noticed, though, that I do get far less results on a Google search pointing to Wikipedia these days than I used to get over a year ago. It seems as if, perhaps, this thing of yours worked or the NOFOLLOW hurt them more than they would care to admit. I guess they had to get rid of spammers, but there might have just been a need for better moderators instead of using NOFOLLOW. It’s just not clear, yet, what NOFOLLOW does just yet…

]]> By: Basketball Wallpapers http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-53480 Basketball Wallpapers Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:40:56 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-53480 correction for comment above mine, PR of wikipedia.org is 9, not 8 :) just checked out... btw i like the idea but i think it's impossible to be done :D too many webmasters, too many minds, impossible to get all of them united... plus there are surfers who find wiki useful and they don't care about follow or nofollow tags :) correction for comment above mine, PR of wikipedia.org is 9, not 8 :) just checked out…

btw i like the idea but i think it’s impossible to be done :D too many webmasters, too many minds, impossible to get all of them united… plus there are surfers who find wiki useful and they don’t care about follow or nofollow tags :)

]]> By: web design http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-48279 web design Mon, 26 May 2008 05:47:09 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-48279 As of today their PR is 8 As of today their PR is 8

]]> By: Geld Lenen http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-46988 Geld Lenen Tue, 06 May 2008 17:34:47 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-46988 I think you miserably failed trying! :P <em>Geld Lenen's last blog post..<a href='http://www.geldonlinelenen.nl/actueel/reclames-over-geld-lenen' rel="nofollow">Reclames over geld lenen</a></em> I think you miserably failed trying! :P

Geld Lenen’s last blog post..Reclames over geld lenen

]]> By: Your 21st http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-46967 Your 21st Tue, 06 May 2008 11:01:11 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-46967 I am in! All the websites I have ever come across in Wikipedia external links are useful, and spam is always removed pretty quickly. Why should the useful links not be given any credit on the website that was made global by all the websites wikipedia links to! I am in! All the websites I have ever come across in Wikipedia external links are useful, and spam is always removed pretty quickly.

Why should the useful links not be given any credit on the website that was made global by all the websites wikipedia links to!

]]> By: John Illnes http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-45098 John Illnes Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:57:49 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-45098 The official claim is that links with the rel=nofollow attribute do not influence the search engine rankings of the target page. In addition to Google, Yahoo and MSN also support the rel=nofollow attribute. i think it helps indexing The official claim is that links with the rel=nofollow attribute do not influence the search engine rankings of the target page. In addition to Google, Yahoo and MSN also support the rel=nofollow attribute.

i think it helps indexing

]]> By: Ejudicator http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-44928 Ejudicator Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:33:11 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-44928 It may be great for all the ignorant people, but not great for the authors of unique content. Think about it, most of the time the re-print permission includes credit to the author of the original piece. If someone uses my work to create a book, I expect something in return, not just a line that says..."Uhm, oh yeah, this guy wrote some stuff that I used, but don't go look him up." It may be great for all the ignorant people, but not great for the authors of unique content. Think about it, most of the time the re-print permission includes credit to the author of the original piece. If someone uses my work to create a book, I expect something in return, not just a line that says…”Uhm, oh yeah, this guy wrote some stuff that I used, but don’t go look him up.”

]]> By: wana http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html/comment-page-4#comment-44797 wana Sun, 06 Apr 2008 16:20:40 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/campaign-to-reduce-wikipedias-pagerank-to-zero.html#comment-44797 I really don't agree with this. Wikipedia is great for all the ignorant people! Let them be enlightened. ;) I really don’t agree with this. Wikipedia is great for all the ignorant people! Let them be enlightened. ;)

]]>