<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net Neutrality Bill in US Senate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/net-neutrality-bill-in-us-senate.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/net-neutrality-bill-in-us-senate.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:37:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/net-neutrality-bill-in-us-senate.html/comment-page-1#comment-17936</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 06:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/net-neutrality-bill-in-us-senate.html#comment-17936</guid>
		<description>&quot;Net Neutrality&quot; is a deliberate misnomer intended to disguise the true purpose of the bill, which is designed to protect large bandwidth users like Google, Yahoo!, and Microsoft from having to pay their fair share of the cost of building a superior Internet structure that will enable THEM to deliver faster, more reliable services to US.

What the large bandwidth users want is for US to pay for THEIR infrastructure upgrade because they don&#039;t yet have the means of passing the costs on to us (which is normally what happens when large infrastructure costs impact corporate earnings).

By the time the online user community gets a clue about the reality behind this ridiculous bill, it will either be too late or the large bandwidth users will have figured out how to recap their higher expenses and they won&#039;t really care any more whether it passes or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Net Neutrality&#8221; is a deliberate misnomer intended to disguise the true purpose of the bill, which is designed to protect large bandwidth users like Google, Yahoo!, and Microsoft from having to pay their fair share of the cost of building a superior Internet structure that will enable THEM to deliver faster, more reliable services to US.</p>
<p>What the large bandwidth users want is for US to pay for THEIR infrastructure upgrade because they don&#8217;t yet have the means of passing the costs on to us (which is normally what happens when large infrastructure costs impact corporate earnings).</p>
<p>By the time the online user community gets a clue about the reality behind this ridiculous bill, it will either be too late or the large bandwidth users will have figured out how to recap their higher expenses and they won&#8217;t really care any more whether it passes or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

