<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Slams Click Forensics Click Fraud Study&#8230;Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/google-slams-click-forensics-click-fraud-studyagain.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/google-slams-click-forensics-click-fraud-studyagain.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google confuta uno studio sul click fraud &#187; Controrete - Search Engine Marketing Blog &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/google-slams-click-forensics-click-fraud-studyagain.html/comment-page-1#comment-21931</link>
		<dc:creator>Google confuta uno studio sul click fraud &#187; Controrete - Search Engine Marketing Blog &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/google-slams-click-forensics-click-fraud-studyagain.html#comment-21931</guid>
		<description>[...] Ghosemajumder Ã¨ convinto che Click Forensics abbia commesso evidenti errori di conteggio. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ghosemajumder Ã¨ convinto che Click Forensics abbia commesso evidenti errori di conteggio. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchEngineSoup &#187; Blog Archive &#187; History of Click Fraud Recapped, so Far&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/google-slams-click-forensics-click-fraud-studyagain.html/comment-page-1#comment-21747</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchEngineSoup &#187; Blog Archive &#187; History of Click Fraud Recapped, so Far&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/google-slams-click-forensics-click-fraud-studyagain.html#comment-21747</guid>
		<description>[...] February 1, 2007: Mr. Beal had a post expounding on the results from the third-party (particularly ClickForensics), and the defense that Google made against the third-party studies. Here is an excerpt from his post; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February 1, 2007: Mr. Beal had a post expounding on the results from the third-party (particularly ClickForensics), and the defense that Google made against the third-party studies. Here is an excerpt from his post; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

