<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s YouTube Losing Viacom Deal to Joost.com?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/googles-youtube-losing-viacom-deal-to-joostcom.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/googles-youtube-losing-viacom-deal-to-joostcom.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viacom Inks Deal with MSN for More Advertising &#171; Insider Marketing: Ramblings of an Online Marketing Maverick</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/googles-youtube-losing-viacom-deal-to-joostcom.html/comment-page-1#comment-38546</link>
		<dc:creator>Viacom Inks Deal with MSN for More Advertising &#171; Insider Marketing: Ramblings of an Online Marketing Maverick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/googles-youtube-losing-viacom-deal-to-joostcom.html#comment-38546</guid>
		<description>[...] appears that Google’s jilted lover, Viacom, is not content with simply suing the search engine and jumping into bed with rival Yahoo. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] appears that Google’s jilted lover, Viacom, is not content with simply suing the search engine and jumping into bed with rival Yahoo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogvaria &#187; YouTubeâ€™s Latest Wins and Losses</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/googles-youtube-losing-viacom-deal-to-joostcom.html/comment-page-1#comment-22803</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogvaria &#187; YouTubeâ€™s Latest Wins and Losses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 11:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/googles-youtube-losing-viacom-deal-to-joostcom.html#comment-22803</guid>
		<description>[...] After Viacom got YouTube to remove its videos and signed a deal with Joost.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After Viacom got YouTube to remove its videos and signed a deal with Joost.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Schramm</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/googles-youtube-losing-viacom-deal-to-joostcom.html/comment-page-1#comment-22290</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Schramm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/googles-youtube-losing-viacom-deal-to-joostcom.html#comment-22290</guid>
		<description>I tested Joost a bit, but I didn&#039;t like how it took the entire screen. It doesn&#039;t let you multi-task like YouTube does, though YouTube is extremely slow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tested Joost a bit, but I didn&#8217;t like how it took the entire screen. It doesn&#8217;t let you multi-task like YouTube does, though YouTube is extremely slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Tomin</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/googles-youtube-losing-viacom-deal-to-joostcom.html/comment-page-1#comment-22287</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Tomin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 02:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/googles-youtube-losing-viacom-deal-to-joostcom.html#comment-22287</guid>
		<description>YouTube is already paying enormous amounts for the bandwidth. How&#039;s Joost.com going to be profitable from advertising alone if the content they are going to offer is &quot;full episodes with high-quality resolution&quot;? 
And then again, how legal it is to distribute full length episodes?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube is already paying enormous amounts for the bandwidth. How&#8217;s Joost.com going to be profitable from advertising alone if the content they are going to offer is &#8220;full episodes with high-quality resolution&#8221;?<br />
And then again, how legal it is to distribute full length episodes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/googles-youtube-losing-viacom-deal-to-joostcom.html/comment-page-1#comment-22250</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/googles-youtube-losing-viacom-deal-to-joostcom.html#comment-22250</guid>
		<description>I think this is great. Living outside the US, sometimes there are only certain ways we can watch our favorite TV shows and there is nothing worst than watching a full length episode at youtube quality.

Been playing around a little with the Joost beta and it looks VERY promising. And if this deal goes ahead I think they will have something VERY special.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is great. Living outside the US, sometimes there are only certain ways we can watch our favorite TV shows and there is nothing worst than watching a full length episode at youtube quality.</p>
<p>Been playing around a little with the Joost beta and it looks VERY promising. And if this deal goes ahead I think they will have something VERY special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

