<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not All Google Domain Names Lead to New Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Hat On</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html/comment-page-1#comment-54504</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Hat On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html#comment-54504</guid>
		<description>How about GoogleYahoo.com assuming that Microsoft fall out of bed with Yahoo? Or should it be Yoogle?

&lt;em&gt;SEO Hat On&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.seoadviser.info/seo-news/seo-adviser-top-ranking-achieved&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Seo Adviser: Top Ranking achieved&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about GoogleYahoo.com assuming that Microsoft fall out of bed with Yahoo? Or should it be Yoogle?</p>
<p><em>SEO Hat On&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.seoadviser.info/seo-news/seo-adviser-top-ranking-achieved' rel="nofollow">Seo Adviser: Top Ranking achieved</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mehus</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html/comment-page-1#comment-22318</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mehus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html#comment-22318</guid>
		<description>I agree completely. As a huge publicly traded company, Google&#039;s legal department has likely grown tremendously. They&#039;re simply in the process of buying up (or winning, through domain name arbitration) any Google-related domain name that contains the word &quot;google&quot; (or any Google product name) in it. Now, what would be interesting is if Google acquired a domain name for a word that isn&#039;t associated with any current Google product.

Some domains have pointed to a likely Google Drive product, and I still see this product as very likely given its employee-only &quot;Platypus&quot; alpha, but most are just that - trademark protection. Some bloggers will do anything for the spotlight, thinking they&#039;ve got the &quot;scoop&quot;.

Cheers,
Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely. As a huge publicly traded company, Google&#8217;s legal department has likely grown tremendously. They&#8217;re simply in the process of buying up (or winning, through domain name arbitration) any Google-related domain name that contains the word &#8220;google&#8221; (or any Google product name) in it. Now, what would be interesting is if Google acquired a domain name for a word that isn&#8217;t associated with any current Google product.</p>
<p>Some domains have pointed to a likely Google Drive product, and I still see this product as very likely given its employee-only &#8220;Platypus&#8221; alpha, but most are just that &#8211; trademark protection. Some bloggers will do anything for the spotlight, thinking they&#8217;ve got the &#8220;scoop&#8221;.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html/comment-page-1#comment-22143</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 03:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html#comment-22143</guid>
		<description>I agree Ross. That suggestion was a quote from the original story. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Ross. That suggestion was a quote from the original story. <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html/comment-page-1#comment-22133</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 05:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html#comment-22133</guid>
		<description>Andy,

You have to be way off base here. If google offered a way to &quot;pay&quot; to get your website on Google faster the uproar would be so massive it would be shut off the same day.

Ross</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p>You have to be way off base here. If google offered a way to &#8220;pay&#8221; to get your website on Google faster the uproar would be so massive it would be shut off the same day.</p>
<p>Ross</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html/comment-page-1#comment-22114</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html#comment-22114</guid>
		<description>Hi Garett, thanks for stopping by.

Dan, how do you know about my Cher &quot;thing&quot;? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Garett, thanks for stopping by.</p>
<p>Dan, how do you know about my Cher &#8220;thing&#8221;? <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garett Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html/comment-page-1#comment-22113</link>
		<dc:creator>Garett Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html#comment-22113</guid>
		<description>I understand what you are saying, but I never suggested that they will use those domains directly.  Google always registers domain names that correspond with either future or existing services to protect themselves.

When Google launches &quot;Google Express&quot;, the domain it uses will almost certainly be express.google.com.  Look at Google Calendar -- googlecalendar.com was registered November 11, 2005 (it wasn&#039;t launched until April 13, 2006).  To this day, googlecalendar.com doesn&#039;t point anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand what you are saying, but I never suggested that they will use those domains directly.  Google always registers domain names that correspond with either future or existing services to protect themselves.</p>
<p>When Google launches &#8220;Google Express&#8221;, the domain it uses will almost certainly be express.google.com.  Look at Google Calendar &#8212; googlecalendar.com was registered November 11, 2005 (it wasn&#8217;t launched until April 13, 2006).  To this day, googlecalendar.com doesn&#8217;t point anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html/comment-page-1#comment-22112</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html#comment-22112</guid>
		<description>I think they are just protecting themselves. Like registering www.andybealeatscheese.com or www.andylikestosingchersongs.edu so nobody else does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they are just protecting themselves. Like registering www.andybealeatscheese.com or www.andylikestosingchersongs.edu so nobody else does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get on Google und Google Express beim nXplorer SEO &#38; Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html/comment-page-1#comment-22110</link>
		<dc:creator>Get on Google und Google Express beim nXplorer SEO &#38; Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html#comment-22110</guid>
		<description>[...] Andy Beal Ã¤uÃŸert zwar berechtigte Zweifel an diesen Spekulationen aber wir werden sehen was die Zukunft/Google uns bringt. Und dass ich die Begriffe Google und Zeit in diesem Satz gleichbedeutend verwenden kann lÃ¤sst mich an diesen Google Artikel denken. Eine Liste mit mehr als 500 Domains (Stand: Juli 2006) kann man Ã¼brigens bei Neil Patel finden. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andy Beal Ã¤uÃŸert zwar berechtigte Zweifel an diesen Spekulationen aber wir werden sehen was die Zukunft/Google uns bringt. Und dass ich die Begriffe Google und Zeit in diesem Satz gleichbedeutend verwenden kann lÃ¤sst mich an diesen Google Artikel denken. Eine Liste mit mehr als 500 Domains (Stand: Juli 2006) kann man Ã¼brigens bei Neil Patel finden. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html/comment-page-1#comment-22109</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html#comment-22109</guid>
		<description>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/channeladvisor-launches-integrated-paid-search-solution.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/channeladvisor-launches-integr ated-paid-search-solution.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kaldenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html/comment-page-1#comment-22108</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kaldenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/not-all-google-domain-names-lead-to-new-services.html#comment-22108</guid>
		<description>Not really related to topic... but does anyone know if a company is attempting to build a platform that will essentially let an advertising manage their MSN, GOOGlE, and YAHOO PPC from one central location.

I would definately be on board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really related to topic&#8230; but does anyone know if a company is attempting to build a platform that will essentially let an advertising manage their MSN, GOOGlE, and YAHOO PPC from one central location.</p>
<p>I would definately be on board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

