<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tracking Potential Google Killers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/tracking-potential-google-killers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/tracking-potential-google-killers.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Classifieds</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/tracking-potential-google-killers.html/comment-page-1#comment-73941</link>
		<dc:creator>Classifieds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 11:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/tracking-potential-google-killers.html#comment-73941</guid>
		<description>Well theres always something new coming out. Remember when Yahoo were the top dog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well theres always something new coming out. Remember when Yahoo were the top dog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Classified Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/tracking-potential-google-killers.html/comment-page-1#comment-67696</link>
		<dc:creator>Classified Ads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/tracking-potential-google-killers.html#comment-67696</guid>
		<description>Google will continue to dominate the search engine market for the forseable future. They are the easiest to us, cleanest and continue to inovate faster than any other competitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google will continue to dominate the search engine market for the forseable future. They are the easiest to us, cleanest and continue to inovate faster than any other competitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/tracking-potential-google-killers.html/comment-page-1#comment-23696</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/tracking-potential-google-killers.html#comment-23696</guid>
		<description>Just Released - The Top 100 Alternative Search Engines, March 2007 Update on Read/WriteWeb; with a brand new Search Engine of the Month!

http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_100_alternative_search_engines_mar07.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just Released &#8211; The Top 100 Alternative Search Engines, March 2007 Update on Read/WriteWeb; with a brand new Search Engine of the Month!</p>
<p>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_100_alternative_search_engine s_mar07.php</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Driscoll Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/tracking-potential-google-killers.html/comment-page-1#comment-22650</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Driscoll Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/tracking-potential-google-killers.html#comment-22650</guid>
		<description>I think Clusty has a great idea. I personally find Google to give irrelevant results at times. Clustering of search results definitely makes weeding through results a bit easier. I&#039;d like to see that type of technology on other search engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Clusty has a great idea. I personally find Google to give irrelevant results at times. Clustering of search results definitely makes weeding through results a bit easier. I&#8217;d like to see that type of technology on other search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/tracking-potential-google-killers.html/comment-page-1#comment-22643</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/02/tracking-potential-google-killers.html#comment-22643</guid>
		<description>I still get the best search results on Google. I&#039;d like to use another &#039;guy,&#039; but it just doesn&#039;t seem to be happening. Interesting to see a list of that many search engines, though.  Had no idea.  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still get the best search results on Google. I&#8217;d like to use another &#8216;guy,&#8217; but it just doesn&#8217;t seem to be happening. Interesting to see a list of that many search engines, though.  Had no idea.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

