<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 29 of Fortune 100 Have Negative Google Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:21:40 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hypothetical case of negative marketing campaign &#124; Venture Itch</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html/comment-page-1#comment-27253</link>
		<dc:creator>Hypothetical case of negative marketing campaign &#124; Venture Itch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html#comment-27253</guid>
		<description>[...] In a recent survey of a Google search on the top 50 UK grocery brands, 20 were found to have detractors in the top ten results, including Coca-Cola, Walkerâ€™s crisps, Lucozade, Mars bars and McCain oven chips. See also 29 of Fortune 100 Have Negative Google Results. 25 of top 30 FTSE companies were &#8220;not easily found&#8221; by search. Blogs are increasingly rivaling mainstream media for mindshare. 15 of the top 37 online news sources are blogs. Blog stories have recently had serious consequences for brands â€“ Kryptonite locks recalled their product at a cost of $10m. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a recent survey of a Google search on the top 50 UK grocery brands, 20 were found to have detractors in the top ten results, including Coca-Cola, Walkerâ€™s crisps, Lucozade, Mars bars and McCain oven chips. See also 29 of Fortune 100 Have Negative Google Results. 25 of top 30 FTSE companies were &#8220;not easily found&#8221; by search. Blogs are increasingly rivaling mainstream media for mindshare. 15 of the top 37 online news sources are blogs. Blog stories have recently had serious consequences for brands â€“ Kryptonite locks recalled their product at a cost of $10m. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venture Itch</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html/comment-page-1#comment-27252</link>
		<dc:creator>Venture Itch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html#comment-27252</guid>
		<description>See article &quot;Hypothetical Case of Negative Marketing Campaign&quot;


http://www.ventureitch.com/?p=193</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See article &#8220;Hypothetical Case of Negative Marketing Campaign&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ventureitch.com/?p=193" rel="nofollow">http://www.ventureitch.com/?p=193</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonix</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html/comment-page-1#comment-23752</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 05:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html#comment-23752</guid>
		<description>lol, great post andy, this i wasn&#039;t really expecting. I loved that coca-cola &quot;killer&quot; :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, great post andy, this i wasn&#8217;t really expecting. I loved that coca-cola &#8220;killer&#8221; <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html/comment-page-1#comment-23737</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html#comment-23737</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a lot that could do it push out that negative result, but I doubt they care. Walmart is targeted so often, something else would take its place. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot that could do it push out that negative result, but I doubt they care. Walmart is targeted so often, something else would take its place. <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Chappell</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html/comment-page-1#comment-23732</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Chappell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html#comment-23732</guid>
		<description>@Brian: Host advertorials on multiple sites with &quot;good&quot; propaganda then build backlinks to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian: Host advertorials on multiple sites with &#8220;good&#8221; propaganda then build backlinks to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html/comment-page-1#comment-23729</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html#comment-23729</guid>
		<description>I guess my question is what to do?  In the case of Walmart, where Walmart Watch appears #6 in the natural results, I guess one way to fix it is to ensure that all Walmart listings dominate the complete top ten in Google for &quot;Walmart&quot;. 

Walmart could prob do this easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess my question is what to do?  In the case of Walmart, where Walmart Watch appears #6 in the natural results, I guess one way to fix it is to ensure that all Walmart listings dominate the complete top ten in Google for &#8220;Walmart&#8221;. </p>
<p>Walmart could prob do this easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 97th Floor</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html/comment-page-1#comment-23726</link>
		<dc:creator>97th Floor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/29-of-fortune-100-have-negative-google-results.html#comment-23726</guid>
		<description>Thanks Andy,

Tyson Foods is what caught me off guard. And the video ranking for Comcast can&#039;t be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andy,</p>
<p>Tyson Foods is what caught me off guard. And the video ranking for Comcast can&#8217;t be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
