Comments on: AOL’s Advertising.com Will Manage Ads for YouTube Rival http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/aols-advertisingcom-will-manage-ads-for-youtube-rival.html Internet Marketing News Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: AOL kümmert sich um Werbeflächen vom NCB und News Corp YouTube-Killer http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/aols-advertisingcom-will-manage-ads-for-youtube-rival.html/comment-page-1#comment-23856 AOL kümmert sich um Werbeflächen vom NCB und News Corp YouTube-Killer Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:48:19 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/aols-advertisingcom-will-manage-ads-for-youtube-rival.html#comment-23856 [...] Dazu stellt Andy Beal zwei Fragen: [...] [...] Dazu stellt Andy Beal zwei Fragen: [...]

]]> By: Mike Mothner http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/aols-advertisingcom-will-manage-ads-for-youtube-rival.html/comment-page-1#comment-23817 Mike Mothner Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:51:35 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/aols-advertisingcom-will-manage-ads-for-youtube-rival.html#comment-23817 The stake that Google has in AOL is going to be a serious issue, and frankly I am shocked this deal went down like this. Google just invested $1.6 billion in it's YouTube purchase and now a company that it owns a sizable stake in is essentially facilitating the advertising of the potential arch-rival of that investment. This is a major conflict of interest! The stake that Google has in AOL is going to be a serious issue, and frankly I am shocked this deal went down like this. Google just invested $1.6 billion in it’s YouTube purchase and now a company that it owns a sizable stake in is essentially facilitating the advertising of the potential arch-rival of that investment. This is a major conflict of interest!

]]> By: Jake http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/aols-advertisingcom-will-manage-ads-for-youtube-rival.html/comment-page-1#comment-23801 Jake Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:29:28 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/aols-advertisingcom-will-manage-ads-for-youtube-rival.html#comment-23801 I read about this in the WSJ today, but they didn't mention the "mess" which you reported. Very interested and tangled web. I am assuming that the two companies wanted a 3rd Party to do the ads, so that neither side got an advantage. Another possibility is that Strategic Data Corp. just can't handle the load. Advertising on the web is still in its young phase. According to Shelly Palmer's article on the coming web inversion, <a href="http://advancedmediacommittee.typepad.com/emmyadvancedmedia/2006/10/tvvideo_web_inv_1.html" rel="nofollow">there is just no way for a large company to spend billions of dollars on web advertising</a>. The infrastructure just isn't there yet. - Jake I read about this in the WSJ today, but they didn’t mention the “mess” which you reported. Very interested and tangled web.

I am assuming that the two companies wanted a 3rd Party to do the ads, so that neither side got an advantage. Another possibility is that Strategic Data Corp. just can’t handle the load.

Advertising on the web is still in its young phase. According to Shelly Palmer’s article on the coming web inversion, there is just no way for a large company to spend billions of dollars on web advertising.

The infrastructure just isn’t there yet.

- Jake

]]>