Comments on: ICANN Rejects .xxx http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/icann-rejects-xxx.html Internet Marketing News Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:38:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Aaron Kronis http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/icann-rejects-xxx.html/comment-page-1#comment-66623 Aaron Kronis Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:27:06 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/icann-rejects-xxx.html#comment-66623 Re: the post mike referred to above, here's the permalink: http://www.wpromote.com/blog/random/lets-talk-about-sexxx/ Re: the post mike referred to above, here’s the permalink:

http://www.wpromote.com/blog/random/lets-talk-about-sexxx/

]]> By: Jonix http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/icann-rejects-xxx.html/comment-page-1#comment-23925 Jonix Mon, 02 Apr 2007 03:46:09 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/icann-rejects-xxx.html#comment-23925 It's too bad that they reject this one. This tld would be a great way to make a big difference between normal and sex sites. The internet should have this. If that had resulted, then search engines should only index a sex site if he was at a .xxx domain. I know that would result in a big problem to the industry, but you all must agree, specially who have kids, that there's alot of crap out there, really alot of crap. It’s too bad that they reject this one. This tld would be a great way to make a big difference between normal and sex sites. The internet should have this. If that had resulted, then search engines should only index a sex site if he was at a .xxx domain. I know that would result in a big problem to the industry, but you all must agree, specially who have kids, that there’s alot of crap out there, really alot of crap.

]]> By: Mike Mothner http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/icann-rejects-xxx.html/comment-page-1#comment-23823 Mike Mothner Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:07:57 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/icann-rejects-xxx.html#comment-23823 Thought I'd follow up again and point to one of my new co-authors who wrote a very humorous post on the .xxx topic: http://www.wpromote.com/blog/ Thought I’d follow up again and point to one of my new co-authors who wrote a very humorous post on the .xxx topic:

http://www.wpromote.com/blog/

]]> By: Mike Mothner http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/icann-rejects-xxx.html/comment-page-1#comment-23807 Mike Mothner Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:57:49 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/icann-rejects-xxx.html#comment-23807 The .xxx domain I thought was a solid idea, but without any sort of mandate that adult sites need to have that extension (not that I support that concept), all it really seemed to serve to do was increase the number of adult-related domains out there. The .xxx domain I thought was a solid idea, but without any sort of mandate that adult sites need to have that extension (not that I support that concept), all it really seemed to serve to do was increase the number of adult-related domains out there.

]]>