<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;McPaper&#8217; to &#8216;McWeb2.0&#8242;: USATODAY Goes Social</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week In SEO - 3/9/07 &#124; TheVanBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html/comment-page-1#comment-40633</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week In SEO - 3/9/07 &#124; TheVanBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html#comment-40633</guid>
		<description>[...] ‘McPaper’ to ‘McWeb2.0′: USTODAY Goes Social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ‘McPaper’ to ‘McWeb2.0′: USTODAY Goes Social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week In SEO - 3/9/07 - TheVanBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html/comment-page-1#comment-23520</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week In SEO - 3/9/07 - TheVanBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 01:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html#comment-23520</guid>
		<description>[...] â€˜McPaperâ€™ to â€˜McWeb2.0â€²: USTODAY Goes Social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] â€˜McPaperâ€™ to â€˜McWeb2.0â€²: USTODAY Goes Social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McCollum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html/comment-page-1#comment-22845</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McCollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html#comment-22845</guid>
		<description>Well, for some perspective, the page now has 292 comments, over 90% of which are negative, and 127 &quot;recommends.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, for some perspective, the page now has 292 comments, over 90% of which are negative, and 127 &#8220;recommends.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JayW</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html/comment-page-1#comment-22840</link>
		<dc:creator>JayW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html#comment-22840</guid>
		<description>258 out of how many readers?  Not even a blip on the  charts.

I like the UI better but the pages are way way to fat. . . They must have locked the usability geeks in the closet. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>258 out of how many readers?  Not even a blip on the  charts.</p>
<p>I like the UI better but the pages are way way to fat. . . They must have locked the usability geeks in the closet. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McCollum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html/comment-page-1#comment-22821</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McCollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 01:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html#comment-22821</guid>
		<description>Actually, some commenters are complaining that their negative comments are being removed.  Obviously not very many of the now 258 mostly negative comments on their announcement have been removed, but even some of those have been alleged to be censored.

It would be nice to be able to contradict patently false news stories, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, some commenters are complaining that their negative comments are being removed.  Obviously not very many of the now 258 mostly negative comments on their announcement have been removed, but even some of those have been alleged to be censored.</p>
<p>It would be nice to be able to contradict patently false news stories, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Schramm</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html/comment-page-1#comment-22820</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Schramm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 01:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html#comment-22820</guid>
		<description>I knew something looked different. They seem to have thrown some usability out the window. Why is it that newspapers don&#039;t want to look like a newspaper? But at least I can comment when they post blatant lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew something looked different. They seem to have thrown some usability out the window. Why is it that newspapers don&#8217;t want to look like a newspaper? But at least I can comment when they post blatant lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Banfield</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html/comment-page-1#comment-22819</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Banfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html#comment-22819</guid>
		<description>Wow, I thought people were exaggerating about how slow the site loads, but even on a high speed connection, it took way too long to load!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I thought people were exaggerating about how slow the site loads, but even on a high speed connection, it took way too long to load!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rcjordan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html/comment-page-1#comment-22816</link>
		<dc:creator>rcjordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/mcpaper-to-mcweb20-usa-today-goes-social.html#comment-22816</guid>
		<description>I read USAToday 3 days a week!

...OK, just the front page.

...OK, through the glass, it&#039;s in the rack outside the door of a favorite restaurant.

...OK, I just glimpse the headlines.

Warren Buffet sez:
(And for newspapers that have pinned their revenue hopes on their Web sites, Buffett had a sobering prediction:) &quot;. . . the economic potential of a newspaper Internet site -- given the many alternative sources of information and entertainment that are free and only a click away -- is at best a small fraction of that existing in the past for a print newspaper facing no competition.&quot;

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/02/AR2007030201278_pf.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read USAToday 3 days a week!</p>
<p>&#8230;OK, just the front page.</p>
<p>&#8230;OK, through the glass, it&#8217;s in the rack outside the door of a favorite restaurant.</p>
<p>&#8230;OK, I just glimpse the headlines.</p>
<p>Warren Buffet sez:<br />
(And for newspapers that have pinned their revenue hopes on their Web sites, Buffett had a sobering prediction:) &#8220;. . . the economic potential of a newspaper Internet site &#8212; given the many alternative sources of information and entertainment that are free and only a click away &#8212; is at best a small fraction of that existing in the past for a print newspaper facing no competition.&#8221;</p>
<p>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/02/AR2007 030201278_pf.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

