Comments on: Should You Use Paid Inclusion for StumbleUpon? http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html Internet Marketing News Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: An Introduction to Social Media Strategy and Socially Driven Content - eMoms at Home - Blogging and Internet Marketing for Home Based Entrepreneurs http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html/comment-page-1#comment-26717 An Introduction to Social Media Strategy and Socially Driven Content - eMoms at Home - Blogging and Internet Marketing for Home Based Entrepreneurs Thu, 24 May 2007 20:45:56 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html#comment-26717 [...] Jordan McCollum on StumbleUpon start to finish and Is your site StumbleUponAble and Should You Use Paid Inclusion for StumbleUpon? [...] [...] Jordan McCollum on StumbleUpon start to finish and Is your site StumbleUponAble and Should You Use Paid Inclusion for StumbleUpon? [...]

]]> By: Finding fun websites: StumbleUpon from start to finish | MamaBlogga http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html/comment-page-1#comment-26645 Finding fun websites: StumbleUpon from start to finish | MamaBlogga Wed, 23 May 2007 18:52:14 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html#comment-26645 [...] I’ve also written about StumbleUpon at work: Is Your Site StumbleUponAble? and Should You Use Paid Inclusion for StumbleUpon? [...] [...] I’ve also written about StumbleUpon at work: Is Your Site StumbleUponAble? and Should You Use Paid Inclusion for StumbleUpon? [...]

]]> By: azrin http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html/comment-page-1#comment-22949 azrin Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:06:58 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html#comment-22949 I hate Stumble Upon. They just con people of the money and website owners have been taken a run for their money. Just like adsense in their early days, and the quality sucks, cos majority of it are from the Eastern European block. Azrin @ http://www.azrin.net I hate Stumble Upon.
They just con people of the money and website owners have been taken a run for their money. Just like adsense in their early days, and the quality sucks, cos majority of it are from the Eastern European block.

Azrin @ http://www.azrin.net

]]> By: Tim http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html/comment-page-1#comment-22944 Tim Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:00:01 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html#comment-22944 Thank you. This answers my question I had about paid inclusion. I've read their advertising page and have browsed other blogs talking about it, but it's great to see performance numbers. Thank you. This answers my question I had about paid inclusion. I’ve read their advertising page and have browsed other blogs talking about it, but it’s great to see performance numbers.

]]> By: kelvin newman http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html/comment-page-1#comment-22932 kelvin newman Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:16:50 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html#comment-22932 It surprises me why people would be willing to use paid inclusion on stumbleupon. It needs a lot less votes to drive significant traffic that the other social networks. It surprises me why people would be willing to use paid inclusion on stumbleupon. It needs a lot less votes to drive significant traffic that the other social networks.

]]> By: Tyler Banfield http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html/comment-page-1#comment-22922 Tyler Banfield Fri, 09 Mar 2007 04:55:40 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html#comment-22922 I would say no, it definitely doesn't seem to worth it. Shoemoney also had a post about SU's paid inclusion, and there wasn't anything positive in it. I would say no, it definitely doesn’t seem to worth it. Shoemoney also had a post about SU’s paid inclusion, and there wasn’t anything positive in it.

]]> By: Meg http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html/comment-page-1#comment-22921 Meg Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:16:55 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html#comment-22921 Hi Jordan, I've been experimenting with paid inclusion for a business directory site, but have now paused the ads. I agree that you have to be careful about a good fit. I too like the SU concept but the quality of the traffic (in terms of page views) was pretty ordinary (I've outlined this in my latest blog post). Hi Jordan,

I’ve been experimenting with paid inclusion for a business directory site, but have now paused the ads. I agree that you have to be careful about a good fit. I too like the SU concept but the quality of the traffic (in terms of page views) was pretty ordinary (I’ve outlined this in my latest blog post).

]]> By: Peter Davis http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html/comment-page-1#comment-22920 Peter Davis Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:00:12 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html#comment-22920 Thanks, I'll have a look. Thanks, I’ll have a look.

]]> By: Jordan McCollum http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html/comment-page-1#comment-22918 Jordan McCollum Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:54:31 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html#comment-22918 I'm pretty sure it's not. I vaguely remember reading the details in the <a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/promote_faq.html" rel="nofollow">SU FAQ</a>; I'm pretty sure they cover this much better than I did. I’m pretty sure it’s not. I vaguely remember reading the details in the SU FAQ; I’m pretty sure they cover this much better than I did.

]]> By: Peter Davis http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html/comment-page-1#comment-22917 Peter Davis Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:52:01 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html#comment-22917 Thanks for the clarification. Does that mean that if someone sits there refreshing the screen, it's a nickel each time they hit the refresh button? Thanks for the clarification. Does that mean that if someone sits there refreshing the screen, it’s a nickel each time they hit the refresh button?

]]> By: Jordan McCollum http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html/comment-page-1#comment-22916 Jordan McCollum Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:47:04 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html#comment-22916 StumbleUpon delivers the visitor directly to your page. They don't click on a link on another website to get there. So it's $0.05 per impression of your page, not click on the toolbar. StumbleUpon delivers the visitor directly to your page. They don’t click on a link on another website to get there. So it’s $0.05 per impression of your page, not click on the toolbar.

]]> By: Peter Davis http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html/comment-page-1#comment-22915 Peter Davis Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:45:31 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/should-you-use-paid-inclusion-for-stumbleupon.html#comment-22915 When you say the "cost is $0.05/impression" do you mean that the cost is five cents per click? When you say the “cost is $0.05/impression” do you mean that the cost is five cents per click?

]]>