<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Internet Ad Spending Passes Newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo E. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html/comment-page-1#comment-23777</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo E. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html#comment-23777</guid>
		<description>@Jonix
IPA reported ad spending in 2005 for

National Newspapers  1,919 mUKP
Regional Newspapers  2,994 mUKP

Total                4,913 mUKP

Internet             1,366 mUKP

The above quoted BBC Report counts plus 41,2 % for UK Internet ad spending in 2006 = makes 1,929 mUKP and there still a long way to go to catch up with newspapers. 

The orginal report was only comparing UK &quot;national printed newspapers&quot; vs. UK online, as Andy writes in his report ... but the heading still refers to &#039;newspaper&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonix<br />
IPA reported ad spending in 2005 for</p>
<p>National Newspapers  1,919 mUKP<br />
Regional Newspapers  2,994 mUKP</p>
<p>Total                4,913 mUKP</p>
<p>Internet             1,366 mUKP</p>
<p>The above quoted BBC Report counts plus 41,2 % for UK Internet ad spending in 2006 = makes 1,929 mUKP and there still a long way to go to catch up with newspapers. </p>
<p>The orginal report was only comparing UK &#8220;national printed newspapers&#8221; vs. UK online, as Andy writes in his report &#8230; but the heading still refers to &#8216;newspaper&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonix</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html/comment-page-1#comment-23776</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html#comment-23776</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get mad, hugo, was just a question and a helping answer.
Returning to the topic, how do you have sure that is NO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get mad, hugo, was just a question and a helping answer.<br />
Returning to the topic, how do you have sure that is NO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo E. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html/comment-page-1#comment-23764</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo E. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html#comment-23764</guid>
		<description>@Jonix: no!
Lets go back to the reason for my comment and the real question: 
Did UK Internet ad spending pass ad spending in UK newspapers? The answer is NO ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonix: no!<br />
Lets go back to the reason for my comment and the real question:<br />
Did UK Internet ad spending pass ad spending in UK newspapers? The answer is NO &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonix</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html/comment-page-1#comment-23757</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 05:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html#comment-23757</guid>
		<description>hugo, you are breaking the rules with myblolog? you just need to crop the image and that&#039;s it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hugo, you are breaking the rules with myblolog? you just need to crop the image and that&#8217;s it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html/comment-page-1#comment-23731</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html#comment-23731</guid>
		<description>Hugo - you said &quot;it should be huge&quot;, which suggests you intended for the avatar to be larger than MyBlogLog allows - which is were it is pulled from. In any event, it seems to have shrunk back to the normal size, so we&#039;re both happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugo &#8211; you said &#8220;it should be huge&#8221;, which suggests you intended for the avatar to be larger than MyBlogLog allows &#8211; which is were it is pulled from. In any event, it seems to have shrunk back to the normal size, so we&#8217;re both happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo E. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html/comment-page-1#comment-23730</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo E. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html#comment-23730</guid>
		<description>If you use a plugin, YOU should know how to use it right.  You picked up my picture from MyBlogLog - I didn&#039;t send it - so you should know how to set dimension right ... and not calling my &#039;avatar&#039; borderline spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you use a plugin, YOU should know how to use it right.  You picked up my picture from MyBlogLog &#8211; I didn&#8217;t send it &#8211; so you should know how to set dimension right &#8230; and not calling my &#8216;avatar&#8217; borderline spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html/comment-page-1#comment-23728</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html#comment-23728</guid>
		<description>Hugo - sorry dude, you avatar is is borderline spam - similar to someone trying to post their URL at the bottom of each post. If you don&#039;t fix it, I may have to disable you from commenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugo &#8211; sorry dude, you avatar is is borderline spam &#8211; similar to someone trying to post their URL at the bottom of each post. If you don&#8217;t fix it, I may have to disable you from commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html/comment-page-1#comment-23727</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html#comment-23727</guid>
		<description>my hugo, what a large avatar you have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my hugo, what a large avatar you have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo E. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html/comment-page-1#comment-23725</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo E. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html#comment-23725</guid>
		<description>Sorry Andy ... it should be huge, hugo

As a small apology:
The breakdown on UK spending (hopefully soon for 2006)
http://www.ipa.co.uk/resource_centre/totaladspend.cfm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Andy &#8230; it should be huge, hugo</p>
<p>As a small apology:<br />
The breakdown on UK spending (hopefully soon for 2006)<br />
http://www.ipa.co.uk/resource_centre/totaladspend.cfm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html/comment-page-1#comment-23722</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html#comment-23722</guid>
		<description>Hugo - you broke my avatar plugin. Is it just my browser or is your avatar huge???

But good point on regional newspaper spending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugo &#8211; you broke my avatar plugin. Is it just my browser or is your avatar huge???</p>
<p>But good point on regional newspaper spending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo E. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html/comment-page-1#comment-23719</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo E. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/uk-internet-ad-spending-passes-newspapers.html#comment-23719</guid>
		<description>&quot;Online spending&quot; passed &quot;National Newspaper ad spending&quot; - there is still a lot more spending in regional and lokal newspaper alone ... so your heading (around for quite a while) needs a correction and maybe US is not so bad if you compare online spending with the few national newspapers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Online spending&#8221; passed &#8220;National Newspaper ad spending&#8221; &#8211; there is still a lot more spending in regional and lokal newspaper alone &#8230; so your heading (around for quite a while) needs a correction and maybe US is not so bad if you compare online spending with the few national newspapers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

