<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 80% of Blogs Have Offensive Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-26499</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 19:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html#comment-26499</guid>
		<description>I believe the operative word here is extreme - whether in thought, words, or action.  That has and always will be the bottom line.  But this goes for those who operate in seemingly moderate and acceptable modes of behavior, but mask their true intentions and ultimately do more damage than those who in one sense are more honest about their feelings and motives.  To me it&#039;s like what happened with Prohibition; everything just went underground.  If the thought police were really smart (?) they would monitor really obvious extreme or bizarre behavior, allow most of the stuff in the middle, and really pay attention to things that don&#039;t add up - that&#039;s where someone or something would hide, before springing something completely out of the blue.  Screeching obscenities draws attention to you, like a child throwing a tantrum, but unless presenting an obvious danger to self, or anyone else, observers will just go around this self-centered display, shaking their heads, pointing out the apparent lesson to their inquiring minds want to know child in tow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the operative word here is extreme &#8211; whether in thought, words, or action.  That has and always will be the bottom line.  But this goes for those who operate in seemingly moderate and acceptable modes of behavior, but mask their true intentions and ultimately do more damage than those who in one sense are more honest about their feelings and motives.  To me it&#8217;s like what happened with Prohibition; everything just went underground.  If the thought police were really smart (?) they would monitor really obvious extreme or bizarre behavior, allow most of the stuff in the middle, and really pay attention to things that don&#8217;t add up &#8211; that&#8217;s where someone or something would hide, before springing something completely out of the blue.  Screeching obscenities draws attention to you, like a child throwing a tantrum, but unless presenting an obvious danger to self, or anyone else, observers will just go around this self-centered display, shaking their heads, pointing out the apparent lesson to their inquiring minds want to know child in tow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-25418</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 11:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html#comment-25418</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised spam wasn&#039;t mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised spam wasn&#8217;t mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McCollum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-25134</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McCollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html#comment-25134</guid>
		<description>Survey says . . . yes!

I surveyed some Diggers real quick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Survey says . . . yes!</p>
<p>I surveyed some Diggers real quick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Stauffer</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-25132</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Stauffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html#comment-25132</guid>
		<description>Is SEO a bad word?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is SEO a bad word?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-25112</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html#comment-25112</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s pretty funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ejacka</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-25111</link>
		<dc:creator>ejacka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html#comment-25111</guid>
		<description>Fuck Off!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck Off!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Raratonga</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-25108</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Raratonga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html#comment-25108</guid>
		<description>As vulgar as swearing is, I highly doubt that isolated instances which call for it it would lead me to leave a blog. 

If someone keeps it up instead of using a more mature tone, then that would force me to leave. I believe that if someone can convey a point as forcefully as someone who doesn&#039;t swear, they have better communication skills.

So, next time you feel the need to swear, try holding it back and improving your conversational skills.

Thankfully, I&#039;ve never read anything offensive on here. The worst I&#039;ve come across are the odd opinions that rub against me but that&#039;s another story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As vulgar as swearing is, I highly doubt that isolated instances which call for it it would lead me to leave a blog. </p>
<p>If someone keeps it up instead of using a more mature tone, then that would force me to leave. I believe that if someone can convey a point as forcefully as someone who doesn&#8217;t swear, they have better communication skills.</p>
<p>So, next time you feel the need to swear, try holding it back and improving your conversational skills.</p>
<p>Thankfully, I&#8217;ve never read anything offensive on here. The worst I&#8217;ve come across are the odd opinions that rub against me but that&#8217;s another story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 80% of Blogs are Offensive, According to Report &#187; SELaplana</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-25094</link>
		<dc:creator>80% of Blogs are Offensive, According to Report &#187; SELaplana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html#comment-25094</guid>
		<description>[...] I really wonder how the word &#8220;China&#8221; became an F-word? Andy&#8217;s wondering too: That really surprises me. Since when was â€˜Chinaâ€™ a bad word? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I really wonder how the word &#8220;China&#8221; became an F-word? Andy&#8217;s wondering too: That really surprises me. Since when was â€˜Chinaâ€™ a bad word? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McCollum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-25088</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McCollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html#comment-25088</guid>
		<description>Personally, I don&#039;t use the F word at all (or any other &quot;swear&quot; words) and I actually do find it highly offensive.  An occasional use might not turn me off from a site personally, but repeated use will keep me from subscribing or returning.

But the study (I believe) was in the context of sites being accessed by people at work.  As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webmasterworld.com/webmaster/3319518.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Brett Tabke said on WMW&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;I think there is a big lesson here for those that want to target corporate readers. That is if you use profanity in your postings, you will be tripping corp proxy filters.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t use the F word at all (or any other &#8220;swear&#8221; words) and I actually do find it highly offensive.  An occasional use might not turn me off from a site personally, but repeated use will keep me from subscribing or returning.</p>
<p>But the study (I believe) was in the context of sites being accessed by people at work.  As <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/webmaster/3319518.htm" rel="nofollow">Brett Tabke said on WMW</a>, &#8220;I think there is a big lesson here for those that want to target corporate readers. That is if you use profanity in your postings, you will be tripping corp proxy filters.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-25086</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html#comment-25086</guid>
		<description>I guess I see your point, but the internet, being a somewhat uncontrolled wild west at the moment, has no place for an adults only internet section - places like HBO or Showtime - where people can view the reality that many people in the real world do in fact use the F word to accentuate their points.  

Although many argue swearing is a substitute for bad vocabulary, I still think it&#039;s wrong for people to impose censorship based on the use of the F word. If the internet police do start patrolling, I&#039;d rather see hate filled rants targeted instead of a simple search for the F word. A few miles away from me, a teen just got arrested for posting a &quot;hit list&quot; on her MySpace page. That seems appropriate and fair, while saying the F word once or twice... should be tolerated.  

But - If the site is half swear words, then yeah, ban it.  I guess i think the extremes that should be looked at closer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I see your point, but the internet, being a somewhat uncontrolled wild west at the moment, has no place for an adults only internet section &#8211; places like HBO or Showtime &#8211; where people can view the reality that many people in the real world do in fact use the F word to accentuate their points.  </p>
<p>Although many argue swearing is a substitute for bad vocabulary, I still think it&#8217;s wrong for people to impose censorship based on the use of the F word. If the internet police do start patrolling, I&#8217;d rather see hate filled rants targeted instead of a simple search for the F word. A few miles away from me, a teen just got arrested for posting a &#8220;hit list&#8221; on her MySpace page. That seems appropriate and fair, while saying the F word once or twice&#8230; should be tolerated.  </p>
<p>But &#8211; If the site is half swear words, then yeah, ban it.  I guess i think the extremes that should be looked at closer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hold the Press: People Say F*(k on Their Blogs : The Last Podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-25080</link>
		<dc:creator>Hold the Press: People Say F*(k on Their Blogs : The Last Podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html#comment-25080</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: For another take on this, Jordan McCollum from Marketing Pilgrim&#8217;s opinion on this can be found here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: For another take on this, Jordan McCollum from Marketing Pilgrim&#8217;s opinion on this can be found here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-25071</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/80-of-blogs-have-offensive-content.html#comment-25071</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s fair enough to exclude any site that has just a single curse word. If you&#039;re watching a TV show, just one F-bomb is enough to make it a minimum of PG13, so the same should apply to blogs.

I certainly try to avoid any bad language on MP, but will tolerate isolated incidents in comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s fair enough to exclude any site that has just a single curse word. If you&#8217;re watching a TV show, just one F-bomb is enough to make it a minimum of PG13, so the same should apply to blogs.</p>
<p>I certainly try to avoid any bad language on MP, but will tolerate isolated incidents in comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

