<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Q1 Better than Expected</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/googles-q1-better-than-expected.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/googles-q1-better-than-expected.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:52:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Barrera</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/googles-q1-better-than-expected.html/comment-page-1#comment-24862</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Barrera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/googles-q1-better-than-expected.html#comment-24862</guid>
		<description>Are they ever going to underperform the estimates?

I was just reading an article in today&#039;s WSJ that was saying that this would be the earnings report that wouldn&#039;t be able to amaze the analysts, but it looks like they are wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are they ever going to underperform the estimates?</p>
<p>I was just reading an article in today&#8217;s WSJ that was saying that this would be the earnings report that wouldn&#8217;t be able to amaze the analysts, but it looks like they are wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
