<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linkbait Isn&#8217;t Always Best</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/linkbait-isnt-always-best.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/linkbait-isnt-always-best.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dealing with a traffic explosion. (not of the automotive type).</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/linkbait-isnt-always-best.html/comment-page-1#comment-43621</link>
		<dc:creator>Dealing with a traffic explosion. (not of the automotive type).</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=2400#comment-43621</guid>
		<description>[...] what is good content. List bait or linkbait type posts may work well in attracting visitors but aren&#8217;t always the best in getting them to stay. You have to think about why your visitors are reading, and how best to talk to them. Personally I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what is good content. List bait or linkbait type posts may work well in attracting visitors but aren&#8217;t always the best in getting them to stay. You have to think about why your visitors are reading, and how best to talk to them. Personally I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week In SEO - 4/27/07 - TheVanBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/linkbait-isnt-always-best.html/comment-page-1#comment-25307</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week In SEO - 4/27/07 - TheVanBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 00:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=2400#comment-25307</guid>
		<description>[...] Linkbait Isnâ€™t Always Best [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Linkbait Isnâ€™t Always Best [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carps</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/linkbait-isnt-always-best.html/comment-page-1#comment-25121</link>
		<dc:creator>Carps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=2400#comment-25121</guid>
		<description>The question behind all of this is... if the age of links is so important is Google going to be able, retroactively, to say &quot;link x came from a non-relevant linkbaiting campaign 2 years ago so we&#039;re going to give it less importance&quot;? Or to put it in a less cruddy fashion - which kind of link weight will out: domain relevance or longevity?

Seems like a bit of a technological stretch to me - because of course a domain that today deals with welsh nose flutes might well have been a shopping directory a year ago when the linkbait was happening.

I&#039;d still say it&#039;s worth doing now for the potential long term benefit of establishing links today that might benefit the domain for years to come - relevance or no relevance.

Once Google effectively tackles it though, I think we&#039;ll start to see relevancy becoming absolutely critical to linkbaiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question behind all of this is&#8230; if the age of links is so important is Google going to be able, retroactively, to say &#8220;link x came from a non-relevant linkbaiting campaign 2 years ago so we&#8217;re going to give it less importance&#8221;? Or to put it in a less cruddy fashion &#8211; which kind of link weight will out: domain relevance or longevity?</p>
<p>Seems like a bit of a technological stretch to me &#8211; because of course a domain that today deals with welsh nose flutes might well have been a shopping directory a year ago when the linkbait was happening.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d still say it&#8217;s worth doing now for the potential long term benefit of establishing links today that might benefit the domain for years to come &#8211; relevance or no relevance.</p>
<p>Once Google effectively tackles it though, I think we&#8217;ll start to see relevancy becoming absolutely critical to linkbaiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Heseltine</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/linkbait-isnt-always-best.html/comment-page-1#comment-25100</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Heseltine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=2400#comment-25100</guid>
		<description>Do you think Google will work to try to counter the â€œSuper Digg Effectâ€ Daniel experienced?

Absolutely, but as to how successful they&#039;ll be, that&#039;s a different matter.  For more complex sites it could be a challenge to determine what is relevant, as the topics could be all over the place.    But I do think that a change is coming to this, which will force a change in the way that people use linkbait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think Google will work to try to counter the â€œSuper Digg Effectâ€ Daniel experienced?</p>
<p>Absolutely, but as to how successful they&#8217;ll be, that&#8217;s a different matter.  For more complex sites it could be a challenge to determine what is relevant, as the topics could be all over the place.    But I do think that a change is coming to this, which will force a change in the way that people use linkbait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/linkbait-isnt-always-best.html/comment-page-1#comment-25097</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=2400#comment-25097</guid>
		<description>I see people making this mistake all the time... geat link bait, but what does this have to do with the topic of your site? Nothing at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see people making this mistake all the time&#8230; geat link bait, but what does this have to do with the topic of your site? Nothing at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/linkbait-isnt-always-best.html/comment-page-1#comment-25036</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=2400#comment-25036</guid>
		<description>I still think that quality content is the key. If one would write interesting articles without necessarily linkbaity titles, you&#039;d get the same or better results... in the long run.
But there&#039;s nothing wrong with a linkbait post from time to time.
BTW, I loved the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/5-ways-jesus-would-promote-himself-in-the-21st-century.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Christian Social Blog and Shop linkbait post&lt;/a&gt;! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think that quality content is the key. If one would write interesting articles without necessarily linkbaity titles, you&#8217;d get the same or better results&#8230; in the long run.<br />
But there&#8217;s nothing wrong with a linkbait post from time to time.<br />
BTW, I loved the <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/5-ways-jesus-would-promote-himself-in-the-21st-century.html" rel="nofollow">Christian Social Blog and Shop linkbait post</a>! <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

