<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is O&#8217;Reilly Hell-bent on a Code of Conduct for Bloggers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/why-is-oreilly-hell-bent-on-a-code-of-conduct-for-bloggers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/why-is-oreilly-hell-bent-on-a-code-of-conduct-for-bloggers.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wisdom of the Crowds Isn&#8217;t the Answer for Everything - Mashable</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/why-is-oreilly-hell-bent-on-a-code-of-conduct-for-bloggers.html/comment-page-1#comment-56001</link>
		<dc:creator>Wisdom of the Crowds Isn&#8217;t the Answer for Everything - Mashable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 04:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/why-is-oreilly-hell-bent-on-a-code-of-conduct-for-bloggers.html#comment-56001</guid>
		<description>[...] provided by Andy Beal over at Marketing Pilgrim today (emphasis added): Do I have to keep repeating myself on this stuff? Why does the web need labeling? And, who’s to say which site is authoritative and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] provided by Andy Beal over at Marketing Pilgrim today (emphasis added): Do I have to keep repeating myself on this stuff? Why does the web need labeling? And, who’s to say which site is authoritative and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/why-is-oreilly-hell-bent-on-a-code-of-conduct-for-bloggers.html/comment-page-1#comment-24455</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/why-is-oreilly-hell-bent-on-a-code-of-conduct-for-bloggers.html#comment-24455</guid>
		<description>Agree with Owen, I think we all need to ignore it until it is gone.

/kff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Owen, I think we all need to ignore it until it is gone.</p>
<p>/kff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/why-is-oreilly-hell-bent-on-a-code-of-conduct-for-bloggers.html/comment-page-1#comment-24451</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/why-is-oreilly-hell-bent-on-a-code-of-conduct-for-bloggers.html#comment-24451</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry ... it will die a death. Noone will remember it in a couple of months time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry &#8230; it will die a death. Noone will remember it in a couple of months time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HMTKSteve</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/why-is-oreilly-hell-bent-on-a-code-of-conduct-for-bloggers.html/comment-page-1#comment-24448</link>
		<dc:creator>HMTKSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/why-is-oreilly-hell-bent-on-a-code-of-conduct-for-bloggers.html#comment-24448</guid>
		<description>Perhaps he just wants something he can sell at a conference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps he just wants something he can sell at a conference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Runa</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/why-is-oreilly-hell-bent-on-a-code-of-conduct-for-bloggers.html/comment-page-1#comment-24442</link>
		<dc:creator>Runa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/04/why-is-oreilly-hell-bent-on-a-code-of-conduct-for-bloggers.html#comment-24442</guid>
		<description>I read about the O&#039;Reilly&#039;s &quot;bloggers code of conduct&quot; and it seems also to me completely unuseful. 

Mainly, the category &quot;blog&quot; is too generic, there are to many different arguments and way to treat them: IMHO the consequence is there might be the same number of codes of conduct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read about the O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s &#8220;bloggers code of conduct&#8221; and it seems also to me completely unuseful. </p>
<p>Mainly, the category &#8220;blog&#8221; is too generic, there are to many different arguments and way to treat them: IMHO the consequence is there might be the same number of codes of conduct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

