<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask.com to Spend $100m to Buy Market Share</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/askcom-to-spend-100m-to-buy-market-share.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/askcom-to-spend-100m-to-buy-market-share.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:17:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/askcom-to-spend-100m-to-buy-market-share.html/comment-page-1#comment-26175</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 12:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/askcom-to-spend-100m-to-buy-market-share.html#comment-26175</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t buy a share of the market place any more than you can buy better rankings in search engines.

What you can do however is to market your site, that is the same for anyone.

If they genuinely have improved, that is a good thing.

A capitalistic economy only thrives when there is competition, and the search market is very capitalistic, and the moment the &#039;big G&#039; is being used by a lot of people due to habit, rather than any realy questioning about why they are using that engine.

The others need to buck up to improve, and if marketing their achievements is the way they are doing it, good for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t buy a share of the market place any more than you can buy better rankings in search engines.</p>
<p>What you can do however is to market your site, that is the same for anyone.</p>
<p>If they genuinely have improved, that is a good thing.</p>
<p>A capitalistic economy only thrives when there is competition, and the search market is very capitalistic, and the moment the &#8216;big G&#8217; is being used by a lot of people due to habit, rather than any realy questioning about why they are using that engine.</p>
<p>The others need to buck up to improve, and if marketing their achievements is the way they are doing it, good for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Odden</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/askcom-to-spend-100m-to-buy-market-share.html/comment-page-1#comment-26159</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Odden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 02:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/askcom-to-spend-100m-to-buy-market-share.html#comment-26159</guid>
		<description>Hmmm. $100m in advertising in a bid for search engine market share. That sounds awfully familiar....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. $100m in advertising in a bid for search engine market share. That sounds awfully familiar&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
