<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MyBlogLog a Bunch of Schmoes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyBlogLog, another Community for Spammers? &#124; Ian Fernando</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-28381</link>
		<dc:creator>MyBlogLog, another Community for Spammers? &#124; Ian Fernando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-28381</guid>
		<description>[...] Marketing Pilgrim states:  Since when did social media optimization become spam? Isnâ€™t MyBlogLog itself nothing but a network to optimize connections between social media sites? I mean really, how successful does MBL expect to be, if it doesnâ€™t want the participation of those that know the value of building a social network for their site? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marketing Pilgrim states:  Since when did social media optimization become spam? Isnâ€™t MyBlogLog itself nothing but a network to optimize connections between social media sites? I mean really, how successful does MBL expect to be, if it doesnâ€™t want the participation of those that know the value of building a social network for their site? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: androo</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-28127</link>
		<dc:creator>androo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-28127</guid>
		<description>good post on the &quot;schmoe&quot; tags...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good post on the &#8220;schmoe&#8221; tags&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26959</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 20:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26959</guid>
		<description>Melissa I feel the same way about the pre-emptive labeling, on first impulse

but thinking about it, if the semantic web is ever going to arrive it&#039;ll take everybody tagging everything, and it&#039;ll be a normal part of our lives to monitor the tags that pertain to us and ours and keep them correct.

I do think MBL&#039;s spammer tag is pretty lame however ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melissa I feel the same way about the pre-emptive labeling, on first impulse</p>
<p>but thinking about it, if the semantic web is ever going to arrive it&#8217;ll take everybody tagging everything, and it&#8217;ll be a normal part of our lives to monitor the tags that pertain to us and ours and keep them correct.</p>
<p>I do think MBL&#8217;s spammer tag is pretty lame however <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Fach</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26929</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Fach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 14:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26929</guid>
		<description>When you consider that Google indexes just about everything, it makes me nervous to even use MBL now because I don&#039;t want someone searching for my name, my business name or my blog and then see that I am considered a spammer. I don&#039;t see one positive reason to allow this. Oh, and I refuse to label myself something that I am not to avoid it in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you consider that Google indexes just about everything, it makes me nervous to even use MBL now because I don&#8217;t want someone searching for my name, my business name or my blog and then see that I am considered a spammer. I don&#8217;t see one positive reason to allow this. Oh, and I refuse to label myself something that I am not to avoid it in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26898</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 15:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26898</guid>
		<description>@Thinking - there&#039;s nothing wrong with the tag &quot;schmoe&quot;, I like it! It&#039;s the connotation associated with it that needs changing. Just let schmoe reference any spammer, why does it need to be associated with &quot;social media optimizer&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Thinking &#8211; there&#8217;s nothing wrong with the tag &#8220;schmoe&#8221;, I like it! It&#8217;s the connotation associated with it that needs changing. Just let schmoe reference any spammer, why does it need to be associated with &#8220;social media optimizer&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Thinking Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26896</link>
		<dc:creator>The Thinking Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 15:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26896</guid>
		<description>Natasha has a point. &quot;SchMOeS - Social Media Optimization Spammers&quot; would have been better but I don&#039;t think Robyn&#039;s intention was to label All Social Media Optimizers As Schmoes.. she was just trying to create a keyword that she thought would sound kind of funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Natasha has a point. &#8220;SchMOeS &#8211; Social Media Optimization Spammers&#8221; would have been better but I don&#8217;t think Robyn&#8217;s intention was to label All Social Media Optimizers As Schmoes.. she was just trying to create a keyword that she thought would sound kind of funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amcÄ±k</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26879</link>
		<dc:creator>amcÄ±k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 21:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26879</guid>
		<description>Nice response Andy! It will be interesting to Watch how well Robyn, the community manager, handles fixing this mistake moving forward. So far she hasnâ€™t done a great job, I give her a â€˜Dâ€™, would be an â€˜Fâ€™ but at least she has made a small effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice response Andy! It will be interesting to Watch how well Robyn, the community manager, handles fixing this mistake moving forward. So far she hasnâ€™t done a great job, I give her a â€˜Dâ€™, would be an â€˜Fâ€™ but at least she has made a small effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; MyBlogLog is Dead - Make room for Technorati&#8217;s NEW &#8220;Teamorati&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26864</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; MyBlogLog is Dead - Make room for Technorati&#8217;s NEW &#8220;Teamorati&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 19:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26864</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m not going to recap the MyBlogLog Revolt you can find good info from Andy, Andy again, Cameron, SEL and Andy Beard. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m not going to recap the MyBlogLog Revolt you can find good info from Andy, Andy again, Cameron, SEL and Andy Beard. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Olthuis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26822</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Olthuis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26822</guid>
		<description>Natasha - the grade wasn&#039;t made for her overall job performance, it was more directed at this specific incident. I apologize to Robyn if that is how it came off. Regardless, I still think she has handled this issue very very poorly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Natasha &#8211; the grade wasn&#8217;t made for her overall job performance, it was more directed at this specific incident. I apologize to Robyn if that is how it came off. Regardless, I still think she has handled this issue very very poorly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26793</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 23:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26793</guid>
		<description>@Natasha - by Robyn&#039;s definition of schmoe - social media optimizer - she is one. I tagged myself with &quot;Schmoe&quot; too, as I am one as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Natasha &#8211; by Robyn&#8217;s definition of schmoe &#8211; social media optimizer &#8211; she is one. I tagged myself with &#8220;Schmoe&#8221; too, as I am one as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natasha Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26792</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 22:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26792</guid>
		<description>I defense of Robyn.  

Granted the name could have been better had it be SchMOeS - Social Media Optimization Spammers. I mean come on they are making an effort to clean up spam.  I&#039;m sure if they weren&#039;t making an effort to clean up the Spam you&#039;d be blogging about all the Spam on MLB - lol.  I love that the spam system reporting system.  Wouldn&#039;t it be great if you could find out which jealous competitor was sending Google that Spam report about one of your clients - lol.

@Andy: I&#039;ve known Robyn for a while now via the many blogs that she has written and via many other Social Media Platforms.  And yeah, she knows a thing or two or three about Social Media; hence why she was hired. Plus, Andy I think that you tagging her a SchMoe, was a little much. I really do hope that you do a follow-up if they are successful with reducing the amount of Spam on MLB ;).

@Cameron: It&#039;s hard to give a person a grade for a job they just started; so I&#039;m not sure how you could make that assessment about the job she&#039;s done so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I defense of Robyn.  </p>
<p>Granted the name could have been better had it be SchMOeS &#8211; Social Media Optimization Spammers. I mean come on they are making an effort to clean up spam.  I&#8217;m sure if they weren&#8217;t making an effort to clean up the Spam you&#8217;d be blogging about all the Spam on MLB &#8211; lol.  I love that the spam system reporting system.  Wouldn&#8217;t it be great if you could find out which jealous competitor was sending Google that Spam report about one of your clients &#8211; lol.</p>
<p>@Andy: I&#8217;ve known Robyn for a while now via the many blogs that she has written and via many other Social Media Platforms.  And yeah, she knows a thing or two or three about Social Media; hence why she was hired. Plus, Andy I think that you tagging her a SchMoe, was a little much. I really do hope that you do a follow-up if they are successful with reducing the amount of Spam on MLB <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>@Cameron: It&#8217;s hard to give a person a grade for a job they just started; so I&#8217;m not sure how you could make that assessment about the job she&#8217;s done so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26791</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 22:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26791</guid>
		<description>On the web, what you say, is what you say. I appreciate your attempt to clarify your comments, but unless you change your original blog post, what you&#039;ve said is still what you&#039;ve said.

Meanwhile, I&#039;ve moved the conversation to a new post.

http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/when-schmoes-fight-back-at-mybloglog.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the web, what you say, is what you say. I appreciate your attempt to clarify your comments, but unless you change your original blog post, what you&#8217;ve said is still what you&#8217;ve said.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I&#8217;ve moved the conversation to a new post.</p>
<p>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/when-schmoes-fight-back-at-myb loglog.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robyn Tippins</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26788</link>
		<dc:creator>Robyn Tippins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 22:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26788</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, I did say that.  I didn&#039;t mean to imply that ALL SMOs were spammers.  I will reiterate that I do not think (nor does MBL think) that all SMOs, SEOs or any other business people are spammers.  There are black-hat SMOs and white-hat SMOs...

The tag schmoe is not private, as no tags are private, however you can choose to opt-out of tags on your profile or you can delete any tag you wish (and it will never reappear).  If you wanted to prevent anyone from tagging you schmoe, you can tag yourself schmoe and then delete it. 

Just like tags aren&#039;t private, the people who tag you aren&#039;t private either.  Like on my profile, you can see that Andy has tagged me schmoe already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, I did say that.  I didn&#8217;t mean to imply that ALL SMOs were spammers.  I will reiterate that I do not think (nor does MBL think) that all SMOs, SEOs or any other business people are spammers.  There are black-hat SMOs and white-hat SMOs&#8230;</p>
<p>The tag schmoe is not private, as no tags are private, however you can choose to opt-out of tags on your profile or you can delete any tag you wish (and it will never reappear).  If you wanted to prevent anyone from tagging you schmoe, you can tag yourself schmoe and then delete it. </p>
<p>Just like tags aren&#8217;t private, the people who tag you aren&#8217;t private either.  Like on my profile, you can see that Andy has tagged me schmoe already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Olthuis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26787</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Olthuis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 21:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26787</guid>
		<description>Nice response Andy! It will be interesting to Watch how well Robyn, the community manager, handles fixing this mistake moving forward. So far she hasn&#039;t done a great job, I give her a &#039;D&#039;, would be an &#039;F&#039; but at least she has made a small effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice response Andy! It will be interesting to Watch how well Robyn, the community manager, handles fixing this mistake moving forward. So far she hasn&#8217;t done a great job, I give her a &#8216;D&#8217;, would be an &#8216;F&#8217; but at least she has made a small effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26782</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 21:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26782</guid>
		<description>@Robyn - with all due respect, you did...

&quot;Spam - If you think someone is spamming you, tag it out loud!  Internally, we like to call a user who games the system a SchMOe (Social Media Optimizer).  Tag anyone who spams you with the term schmoe.&quot;

MBL made a mistake - again! 

Not only are you equating Social Media Optimizer with a spammer, but your reporting tool isn&#039;t even private. Can you imagine if Google let search users publicly label spam results as such - for everyone to see? Even they know that spam report tools are open to abuse.

If your pre-MBL background was with Social media and SEO, that actually makes it worse, not better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robyn &#8211; with all due respect, you did&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Spam &#8211; If you think someone is spamming you, tag it out loud!  Internally, we like to call a user who games the system a SchMOe (Social Media Optimizer).  Tag anyone who spams you with the term schmoe.&#8221;</p>
<p>MBL made a mistake &#8211; again! </p>
<p>Not only are you equating Social Media Optimizer with a spammer, but your reporting tool isn&#8217;t even private. Can you imagine if Google let search users publicly label spam results as such &#8211; for everyone to see? Even they know that spam report tools are open to abuse.</p>
<p>If your pre-MBL background was with Social media and SEO, that actually makes it worse, not better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SchMOe - I Tagged Myself on MyBlogLog &#124; Andy Beard - Niche Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26777</link>
		<dc:creator>SchMOe - I Tagged Myself on MyBlogLog &#124; Andy Beard - Niche Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26777</guid>
		<description>[...] Now Danny is yawning about tagging but then Danny doesn&#039;t use tagging on Search Engine Land. Andy doesn&#039;t like being likened to the phrase.  And what are the legal ramifications of allowing just anyone to publicly label another a spammer? Calling someone a spammer - or allowing them to be called one- could be a huge detriment to their reputation, and something they may wish to contest in a libel case. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now Danny is yawning about tagging but then Danny doesn&#39;t use tagging on Search Engine Land. Andy doesn&#39;t like being likened to the phrase.  And what are the legal ramifications of allowing just anyone to publicly label another a spammer? Calling someone a spammer &#8211; or allowing them to be called one- could be a huge detriment to their reputation, and something they may wish to contest in a libel case. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robyn Tippins</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26773</link>
		<dc:creator>Robyn Tippins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 19:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26773</guid>
		<description>Andy, nobody here said SMO=Spammers.  My blog is primarily concerned with Social Networking.  Much of my consulting pre-MyBlogLog had to do with Social Media and SEO.  If they hated SMOs they wouldn&#039;t have hired me.

Social Media &#039;Optimizers&#039; is a funny (I thought) way to refer to the way people game social networking sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, nobody here said SMO=Spammers.  My blog is primarily concerned with Social Networking.  Much of my consulting pre-MyBlogLog had to do with Social Media and SEO.  If they hated SMOs they wouldn&#8217;t have hired me.</p>
<p>Social Media &#8216;Optimizers&#8217; is a funny (I thought) way to refer to the way people game social networking sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech @ internet duct tape</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26767</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech @ internet duct tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 17:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26767</guid>
		<description>What is the advantage to the user for tagging other blogs?

I can view my communities sorted by tags?

I&#039;m confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the advantage to the user for tagging other blogs?</p>
<p>I can view my communities sorted by tags?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26764</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 17:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26764</guid>
		<description>@Andrew - they should have just called them &quot;social media spammers&quot;. They&#039;re no better than Calacanis or Godin referring to all SEO&#039;s as spammers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andrew &#8211; they should have just called them &#8220;social media spammers&#8221;. They&#8217;re no better than Calacanis or Godin referring to all SEO&#8217;s as spammers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html/comment-page-1#comment-26763</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 16:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html#comment-26763</guid>
		<description>I think this is way stupid and if the smiling face of Robyn Tippins didn&#039;t assure me that it was going to be ok then I&#039;d be doubly offended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is way stupid and if the smiling face of Robyn Tippins didn&#8217;t assure me that it was going to be ok then I&#8217;d be doubly offended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

