<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Sevens Are Tops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/top-sevens-are-tops.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/top-sevens-are-tops.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:38:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weird Stuff Online :) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top 7 Lists Lead The Pack On Digg</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/top-sevens-are-tops.html/comment-page-1#comment-26743</link>
		<dc:creator>Weird Stuff Online :) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top 7 Lists Lead The Pack On Digg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 08:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/top-sevens-are-tops.html#comment-26743</guid>
		<description>[...] â€œTop 7â€ lists actually scored a 59% success rate, as measured by Jones, compared to 39% for the traditional Top 10 compilations.Â  Marketing Pilgrimâ€™s Jordan McCollum, who noticed Jonesâ€™s experiment long before I did, also points out that â€œsuccessâ€ was defined as making the front page of Digg. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] â€œTop 7â€ lists actually scored a 59% success rate, as measured by Jones, compared to 39% for the traditional Top 10 compilations.Â  Marketing Pilgrimâ€™s Jordan McCollum, who noticed Jonesâ€™s experiment long before I did, also points out that â€œsuccessâ€ was defined as making the front page of Digg. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/top-sevens-are-tops.html/comment-page-1#comment-26634</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/top-sevens-are-tops.html#comment-26634</guid>
		<description>I tried a 7+7 today

It did at least get picked up in a few linkblogs, but I doubt it is going to do insanely well on Digg as it does have some Google negativity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried a 7+7 today</p>
<p>It did at least get picked up in a few linkblogs, but I doubt it is going to do insanely well on Digg as it does have some Google negativity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEOrefugee</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/top-sevens-are-tops.html/comment-page-1#comment-26507</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOrefugee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 22:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/top-sevens-are-tops.html#comment-26507</guid>
		<description>Jordan, you hit on a very good point. The backlash against Top 10 lists has been pretty noticeable lately. Even if they get promoted there is usually a comment or 5 talking about how played out the Top 10 list is and they are getting MUCH harder to get to the front page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordan, you hit on a very good point. The backlash against Top 10 lists has been pretty noticeable lately. Even if they get promoted there is usually a comment or 5 talking about how played out the Top 10 list is and they are getting MUCH harder to get to the front page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

