Comments on: Yahoo Allows Content Filtering for SEO, with “Robots-Nocontent” Tag

By: » Webspam2.0 und viel Erotik (-Bier) | seoFM - der erste deutsche PodCast fÃ¼r SEOs und Online-Marketer

Tue, 08 May 2007 19:30:31 +0000

[...] Yahoo´s noContent Tag – das neue Cloaking? [...]

By: Michael Martinez

Michael Martinez — Fri, 04 May 2007 00:00:13 +0000

And people had better start expanding their under-the-hood checking for all those links they are out there buying, swapping, and begging.

By: DotNetNuke

DotNetNuke — Thu, 03 May 2007 19:59:56 +0000

This is a cool method for filtering.

By: robwatts

robwatts — Thu, 03 May 2007 16:05:28 +0000

I think the back door targets will be those who sell on, or offer aff content with no inhouse payment processing. The message will be clear, use our tags or risk deselection. More FUD, here we come.

By: Chino Yray

Chino Yray — Thu, 03 May 2007 12:18:13 +0000

nice. now, we can remove those posts or content where spammers gone wild.

actually SEO, I do think it is just an option for blog owners and site owners.

By: Dario

Dario — Thu, 03 May 2007 11:39:59 +0000

I’m still a firm believer of search engines making better, smarter algorithms instead of annoying bloggers and webmasters with their new “rules to make their job easier”.

By: Robots-Nocontent Tag Introduced » SELaplana

Robots-Nocontent Tag Introduced » SELaplana — Thu, 03 May 2007 07:39:33 +0000

[...] They’re also talking here, here, here, here, here, here [...]

By: Michael Martinez

Michael Martinez — Wed, 02 May 2007 23:49:56 +0000

I have to admit I didn’t think anyone could dream up anything more stupid and useless than “rel=’nofollow’”, but Yahoo! has obviously outdone Google in Stupid Search Indexing Tricks.

How long will it be before Rand Fishkin is told at some conference he needs to start excluding certain portions of his on-page content or face penalties in the Yahoo! index?

By: SEOrefugee

SEOrefugee — Wed, 02 May 2007 22:34:51 +0000

Whatever happened to the days of “act as if the search engines didn’t exist?” Can we get back to those please? Between nofollow, nodp, and now nocontent, it’s getting a bit ridiculous. I want a nocare tag.