<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Ask Commercial: Better, But That&#8217;s Not Saying Much</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week In SEO - 6/22/07 - TheVanBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html/comment-page-1#comment-28247</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week In SEO - 6/22/07 - TheVanBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 01:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html#comment-28247</guid>
		<description>[...] Another Ask Commercial: Better, But Thatâ€™s Not Saying Much [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another Ask Commercial: Better, But Thatâ€™s Not Saying Much [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html/comment-page-1#comment-28193</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 09:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html#comment-28193</guid>
		<description>They are showing the below advert over here in Europe, a lot better than the above video. :-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvQTc2O8dlw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are showing the below advert over here in Europe, a lot better than the above video. <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvQTc2O8dlw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trickster</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html/comment-page-1#comment-28148</link>
		<dc:creator>Trickster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html#comment-28148</guid>
		<description>Hasn&#039;t Ask.com now made the most TV commercials out of all the major search engines?  Yet they remain last? I&#039;ve seen Yahoo commercials but it&#039;s been awhile and the only MSN commercial was that &quot;follow the butterfly&quot; one from back in the day.  

And has Google ever had a TV commercial? Or even any kind of traditional mass advertising?  

I still think Ask should spend their money working on &quot;The Algorithm&quot; so that it does provide noticeably more reliable and relevant results consistently than the other major search engines for the average Internet user instead of producing  more lame commercials.  

I put together all of the search engine TV commercials including the old Ask ads (before they booted Jeeves!) on my blog last year if anybody is interested - http://www.seotrickster.com/search-engine-commercials/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hasn&#8217;t Ask.com now made the most TV commercials out of all the major search engines?  Yet they remain last? I&#8217;ve seen Yahoo commercials but it&#8217;s been awhile and the only MSN commercial was that &#8220;follow the butterfly&#8221; one from back in the day.  </p>
<p>And has Google ever had a TV commercial? Or even any kind of traditional mass advertising?  </p>
<p>I still think Ask should spend their money working on &#8220;The Algorithm&#8221; so that it does provide noticeably more reliable and relevant results consistently than the other major search engines for the average Internet user instead of producing  more lame commercials.  </p>
<p>I put together all of the search engine TV commercials including the old Ask ads (before they booted Jeeves!) on my blog last year if anybody is interested &#8211; http://www.seotrickster.com/search-engine-commercials/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html/comment-page-1#comment-28133</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html#comment-28133</guid>
		<description>@Chuck - fair enough, but these are still obscure search terms (popular right now, but not mainstream), which casts Ask.com as the search engine for obscure terms. I&#039;m pretty sure the people using Google do so because they trust Google to find results for mainstream terms.

I guess we&#039;re all subjective, the real test will be if Ask can improve its audience share from running the ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chuck &#8211; fair enough, but these are still obscure search terms (popular right now, but not mainstream), which casts Ask.com as the search engine for obscure terms. I&#8217;m pretty sure the people using Google do so because they trust Google to find results for mainstream terms.</p>
<p>I guess we&#8217;re all subjective, the real test will be if Ask can improve its audience share from running the ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Olsen</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html/comment-page-1#comment-28132</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Olsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html#comment-28132</guid>
		<description>Andy, I think you missed my point. People *do* search for weird obscure things, thus &quot;cats that looks like hitler&quot; is a top search result. These ads are playing to what people really search for, but in a cartoonish/stylized way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, I think you missed my point. People *do* search for weird obscure things, thus &#8220;cats that looks like hitler&#8221; is a top search result. These ads are playing to what people really search for, but in a cartoonish/stylized way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html/comment-page-1#comment-28131</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html#comment-28131</guid>
		<description>@Chuck - true, but why make ads that appeal to those that search for the obscure? It just seems like Ask is trying to be too clever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chuck &#8211; true, but why make ads that appeal to those that search for the obscure? It just seems like Ask is trying to be too clever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McCollum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html/comment-page-1#comment-28130</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McCollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html#comment-28130</guid>
		<description>Yes, Jeff, that was exactly what I meant.  And it is a continuation of &quot;Chicks with swords&quot; because it is objectifying the opposite sex.  It&#039;s just the opposite opposite sex of last time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Jeff, that was exactly what I meant.  And it is a continuation of &#8220;Chicks with swords&#8221; because it is objectifying the opposite sex.  It&#8217;s just the opposite opposite sex of last time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Olsen</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html/comment-page-1#comment-28129</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Olsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html#comment-28129</guid>
		<description>I think there are some legitimate criticisms to be made of these commercials, but it also smells a bit elitist to me. Take a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?sa=X&amp;date=2007-6-20&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google Hot Trends&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;cats that look like hitler&quot; is a #4 search. People search for funny, weird crap. These ads play to that, while poking fun at it (and  yes, us) at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are some legitimate criticisms to be made of these commercials, but it also smells a bit elitist to me. Take a look at <a href="http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?sa=X&amp;date=2007-6-20" rel="nofollow">Google Hot Trends</a>. &#8220;cats that look like hitler&#8221; is a #4 search. People search for funny, weird crap. These ads play to that, while poking fun at it (and  yes, us) at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html/comment-page-1#comment-28128</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html#comment-28128</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but I have to call bullshit on this one - Kato (a man, despite his hair) is the one being objectified.  Unless that was your point (and I don&#039;t think that it was since you described Ask.com as &quot;still objectifying the opposite sex&quot; - which means a continuation of what they&#039;ve been up to, i.e.: &quot;Chicks with swords&quot;).  And yes, while it weird, it also makes a great point, namely that Ask.com can help you find the weird, the bizarre, and yes, even the unpopular/long-since-over-it/my-god-who-would-want-this-stuff in mass quantities, no less.

Quizno&#039;s took a similar approach with their (gross) dead, singing hamsters and it worked like a charm; I think Ask.com is getting what they&#039;re looking for with their off-color, offbeat ad campaign: word-of-mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but I have to call bullshit on this one &#8211; Kato (a man, despite his hair) is the one being objectified.  Unless that was your point (and I don&#8217;t think that it was since you described Ask.com as &#8220;still objectifying the opposite sex&#8221; &#8211; which means a continuation of what they&#8217;ve been up to, i.e.: &#8220;Chicks with swords&#8221;).  And yes, while it weird, it also makes a great point, namely that Ask.com can help you find the weird, the bizarre, and yes, even the unpopular/long-since-over-it/my-god-who-would-want-this-stuff in mass quantities, no less.</p>
<p>Quizno&#8217;s took a similar approach with their (gross) dead, singing hamsters and it worked like a charm; I think Ask.com is getting what they&#8217;re looking for with their off-color, offbeat ad campaign: word-of-mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html/comment-page-1#comment-28121</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html#comment-28121</guid>
		<description>Yikes! - maybe CB+P is going for the &quot;so bad, you can&#039;t help talking about it&quot; angle - at least I hope that&#039;s their intent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes! &#8211; maybe CB+P is going for the &#8220;so bad, you can&#8217;t help talking about it&#8221; angle &#8211; at least I hope that&#8217;s their intent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Driscoll Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html/comment-page-1#comment-28119</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Driscoll Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/another-ask-commercial-better-but-thats-not-saying-much.html#comment-28119</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what Ask is trying to convey here... we provide the most relevant results on obscure searches like &quot;chicks with swords&quot; and &quot;Kato Kaelin&quot;? Well, Yippeee!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what Ask is trying to convey here&#8230; we provide the most relevant results on obscure searches like &#8220;chicks with swords&#8221; and &#8220;Kato Kaelin&#8221;? Well, Yippeee!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

