<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forbes Goes Negative on SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forbes-goes-negative-on-seo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forbes-goes-negative-on-seo.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:40:15 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Negative SEO blog : SEOassassin &#187; [Negative SEO] - Whoa, watch that SERP fill up&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forbes-goes-negative-on-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-28604</link>
		<dc:creator>Negative SEO blog : SEOassassin &#187; [Negative SEO] - Whoa, watch that SERP fill up&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forbes-goes-negative-on-seo.html#comment-28604</guid>
		<description>[...] Andy Beal (actually a contributed piece bylined to Jordan McCollum) (I gather Ms McCollum rather disapproves of the whole thing  ) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andy Beal (actually a contributed piece bylined to Jordan McCollum) (I gather Ms McCollum rather disapproves of the whole thing  ) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Eaves</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forbes-goes-negative-on-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-28498</link>
		<dc:creator>David Eaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forbes-goes-negative-on-seo.html#comment-28498</guid>
		<description>The content nicking thing works, some Chinese scumbags (seo.bestseocompany.cn) have done it to me and now one of my pages (seoco.co.uk/optimised-web-design.html) will not rank for anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The content nicking thing works, some Chinese scumbags (seo.bestseocompany.cn) have done it to me and now one of my pages (seoco.co.uk/optimised-web-design.html) will not rank for anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaan Kanellis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forbes-goes-negative-on-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-28466</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaan Kanellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forbes-goes-negative-on-seo.html#comment-28466</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t 6 out of 7 of these techniques (excluding denial of service attacks) require Google cooperation to make happen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t 6 out of 7 of these techniques (excluding denial of service attacks) require Google cooperation to make happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
