Comments on: Forget Googlewhacking, Try Finding a Googlenope http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html Internet Marketing News Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dan Klein http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html/comment-page-1#comment-30027 Dan Klein Sun, 05 Aug 2007 19:00:48 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html#comment-30027 In the Sunday,8/5/2007,Washington Post Magazine, Gene Weingarten had a follow-up column to his original Googlenopes column. He mentions a new website, http://googlenope.com, which is a reader contest on these. It's pretty clever; definitely worth checking out. In the Sunday,8/5/2007,Washington Post Magazine, Gene Weingarten had a follow-up column to his original Googlenopes column. He mentions a new website, http://googlenope.com, which is a reader contest on these. It’s pretty clever; definitely worth checking out.

]]> By: Editor http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html/comment-page-1#comment-27194 Editor Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:29:27 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html#comment-27194 Got a googlewhack. "diamond feet you" Got a googlewhack.

“diamond feet you”

]]> By: Ivan Pope http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html/comment-page-1#comment-27186 Ivan Pope Fri, 01 Jun 2007 23:00:39 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html#comment-27186 Googlewhacking is hard. Googlenoping is piss easy. Why? Because it's fairly easy to come up with a phrase that no-one has ever written online before - you only have to be fairly daft. Just swappng words in short sentences will quickly give you a whole bunch. But finding a combination of words that only one person has ever written online is harder. Why? Because the words have to be to some degree sensible, so that one person has used them, but no others. Googlenoping is just dumb. Oh, that's a Googlenope. It is easy to thing this do. Oh, that's another one. It is easy to thing do. That's also one. See, easy. Googlewhacking is hard. Googlenoping is piss easy. Why? Because it’s fairly easy to come up with a phrase that no-one has ever written online before – you only have to be fairly daft. Just swappng words in short sentences will quickly give you a whole bunch. But finding a combination of words that only one person has ever written online is harder. Why? Because the words have to be to some degree sensible, so that one person has used them, but no others. Googlenoping is just dumb. Oh, that’s a Googlenope. It is easy to thing this do. Oh, that’s another one. It is easy to thing do. That’s also one. See, easy.

]]> By: Hal O'Brien http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html/comment-page-1#comment-27185 Hal O'Brien Fri, 01 Jun 2007 22:31:53 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html#comment-27185 Editor@5: "over-efficient bureaucracy" True. But "efficient bureaucracy" gets 25,900 hits. Probably a framing problem. Microsoft is an over-efficient bureaucracy, or else they wouldn't have faced an anti-trust lawsuit. Google might be an over-efficient bureaucracy, if some people's reactions to Google Street Views is any indication. The difference between public sector and private sector bureaucracies is merely one of funding -- their behaviors are much the same. Editor@5:
“over-efficient bureaucracy”

True. But “efficient bureaucracy” gets 25,900 hits.

Probably a framing problem. Microsoft is an over-efficient bureaucracy, or else they wouldn’t have faced an anti-trust lawsuit. Google might be an over-efficient bureaucracy, if some people’s reactions to Google Street Views is any indication.

The difference between public sector and private sector bureaucracies is merely one of funding — their behaviors are much the same.

]]> By: Editor http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html/comment-page-1#comment-27154 Editor Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:47:17 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html#comment-27154 and "grand forks crabs" and “grand forks crabs”

]]> By: Editor http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html/comment-page-1#comment-27153 Editor Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:45:56 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html#comment-27153 "over-efficient bureaucracy" “over-efficient bureaucracy”

]]> By: Andy Beal http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html/comment-page-1#comment-27142 Andy Beal Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:57:34 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html#comment-27142 I see I've opened up my own can of worms here. :-) Have at it! I see I’ve opened up my own can of worms here. :-)

Have at it!

]]> By: TomCritchlow http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html/comment-page-1#comment-27139 TomCritchlow Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:51:15 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html#comment-27139 Lol at brian. Nice spot ;-) "andy beal loves penguins" was my first guess. DO NOT ask me why (cos I have no idea :-p ) Lol at brian. Nice spot ;-)

“andy beal loves penguins” was my first guess. DO NOT ask me why (cos I have no idea :-p )

]]> By: Andy Beal http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html/comment-page-1#comment-27133 Andy Beal Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:16:19 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html#comment-27133 @brian - lol @brian – lol

]]> By: Brian Chappell http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html/comment-page-1#comment-27131 Brian Chappell Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:59:36 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/forget-googlewhacking-try-finding-a-googlenope.html#comment-27131 found one with 1 result: "andy beal raleigh" and another with 0: "andy beal talks about seo" Looks like you need to talk more about SEO andy ;) found one with 1 result: “andy beal raleigh”
and another with 0: “andy beal talks about seo”

Looks like you need to talk more about SEO andy ;)

]]>