sir jorge’s last blog post..Role Models Review

Jesus, we’re talking about more than negative press. Negative press is what paris hilton was getting, negative press is what elected officials try to create for their opponents when they campaign i.e. has little or nothing to do with truth. This is a narrative point of view with some numbers to back it up and clearly an issue that affects us all.

You sound like those nimrods on pennsylvania ave that say it is negative press to show body bags and caskets coming home from the invasion of Iraq. The caskets might be a negative image but they certainly need to be seen – Sicko might be negative but it too needs to be considered.

As for the Google blogger that might be it and we’ll sure miss that champion of the unfortunate.

I don’t think she was trying to do anything than offer a service to people who want to counter negative press such as that from Moore’s movie.

However, it’s exactly that tactic that gives him so much success. Like him or hate him, you’re going to be talking about his films. That’s the hype that Brittany was talking about.

Actually ,it is much more than hype which fuels – could it be he deals with topics that resonate with many of us. His presentations are well crafted, high value productions and he often gets in the face of “the man”. His point of view is anti-establishment just when the establishment seems about to overwhelm us. A necessary voice I’d say and I applaud his efforts.

Google MUST remove algorithms of PENALTY for external SEO techniques immediately! Or there will be a lot of google de-SEO firms very soon, which will heavily undermine corporative google image in the following way:

“We are offering services for downranking your competitors in google
- Sandboxing $299
- 30 Filtering $99
Any website or separate web pages with PR lower than 6. Guarantee.”

Shame on google programmers!

If google do not remove penalties for external factors, then it will have BIG TROUBLES very soon. Many webmasters will say good bye to PARANOID Google, and will say hello to CLEAN Yahoo!

2-3 years ago there was a possibility just to write a good high-quality and relevant articles, create web pages, follow guidelines and that was enough to appear in top google search results. It was a significant advantage of google – to rank sites not only for internal SEO tricks & backlinks, but also for _relevant_ content. 2-3 years ago the factor of relevancy of content was important as well as the factor of amount of relevant back links.
Nowadays, algorithm of google is completely different than 2-3 years ago, and the factor of back links is significantly more important than relevancy of content! A lot of high-quality sites were downranked, undervalued or just partially disappeared from top index for no obvious reason. I read a lot of google patents, and I must admit that there are serious logical mistakes and contradictions in fundamental assumptions of many algorithms. I call them NOISE ALGORITHMS, because while performing “smart” filtering and evaluations of site rankings these algorithms introduce a lot of unnecessary informational noise and disorder, instead of just finding relevant content.

It sad to say, but nowadays google reminds me the old AltaVista.

Also, I doubt Michael Moore will mind as Brittany mentioned, it’s just more hype for the movie.

It’s a blog and there is something called “freedom of speech”

Additionally I don’t think she Lauren is expressing Goggles position on the film, all she is doing is expressing an opinion.

Even Googlers are entitled to them.

Salespeople are always viewing the world through a very tactical, very can-I-make-my-numbers-this-month lens — where nearly everyone else saw controversy, they (or just Lauren, who authored the post) saw a chance to make some money off of Big Health(tm).