<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LiveJournal Faces Community Backlash for Deleting Accounts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/livejournal-faces-community-backlash-for-deleting-accounts.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/livejournal-faces-community-backlash-for-deleting-accounts.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:14:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/livejournal-faces-community-backlash-for-deleting-accounts.html/comment-page-1#comment-27210</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 17:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/livejournal-faces-community-backlash-for-deleting-accounts.html#comment-27210</guid>
		<description>You missed the point.  It wasn&#039;t just sexually explicit fannish journals coming under the gun for being sexually explicit; it was any journals that had unacceptable search terms in their journal profiles that were targeted.  It had nothing to do with the actual content of the journals.  It&#039;s the equivalent of the thought police.  Otherwise, survivor/support journals and that one Nabokov discussion group wouldn&#039;t have been suspended.  The LJ abuse team was working off of a hit list supplied by a group who thinks it&#039;s appropriate to display the Confederate flag on their anti-pedophilia page.  There was a lot &quot;objectionable&quot; about this, but none of it was coming from fandom.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed the point.  It wasn&#8217;t just sexually explicit fannish journals coming under the gun for being sexually explicit; it was any journals that had unacceptable search terms in their journal profiles that were targeted.  It had nothing to do with the actual content of the journals.  It&#8217;s the equivalent of the thought police.  Otherwise, survivor/support journals and that one Nabokov discussion group wouldn&#8217;t have been suspended.  The LJ abuse team was working off of a hit list supplied by a group who thinks it&#8217;s appropriate to display the Confederate flag on their anti-pedophilia page.  There was a lot &#8220;objectionable&#8221; about this, but none of it was coming from fandom.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
