<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Roundup, June 18</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/news-roundup-june-18.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/news-roundup-june-18.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:38:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: horisly</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/news-roundup-june-18.html/comment-page-1#comment-28051</link>
		<dc:creator>horisly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/news-roundup-june-18.html#comment-28051</guid>
		<description>&quot;83 Top Landing Page Tips from the Pros &quot;

it&#039;s good value for me. thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;83 Top Landing Page Tips from the Pros &#8221;</p>
<p>it&#8217;s good value for me. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Refugee Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/news-roundup-june-18.html/comment-page-1#comment-27941</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Refugee Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/06/news-roundup-june-18.html#comment-27941</guid>
		<description>As someone in our forums mentioned, Google might not have updated the algorithm, they could have just &quot;turned a knob or two&quot; in terms of what it values etc. Essentially that wouldn&#039;t be an update to the algo, but it would still have dramatic effects to the rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone in our forums mentioned, Google might not have updated the algorithm, they could have just &#8220;turned a knob or two&#8221; in terms of what it values etc. Essentially that wouldn&#8217;t be an update to the algo, but it would still have dramatic effects to the rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

