Thursday, July 5th, 2007 by Jordan McCollum
Many a marketer contemplates using user-generated content and other forms of social media. Despite evidence of truly good UGC campaigns, marketers continue to express doubt about the usefulness of UGC and social media.
Studies show marketers and consumers doubt UGC and social media
The E-Commerce Times reports today on a JupiterResearch study released Saturday. The study stated that “The majority of online shoppers who have used social and community sites while researching and purchasing do not believe that such sites affected their purchase decisions, and few online shoppers said they spend incrementally more due to their use of social and community sites.”
JupiterResearch analyst Patty Freeman Evans told the E-Commerce Times:
Retailer[s] should take a pause from all the hype they’ve heard about social networking and social media because those sites are not something that’s going to immediately drive incremental sales for them.
The social and community Web sites that are out there are nice experiences, but not the main places where people are looking to make purchase decisions.
If retailers want to take advantage of the social aspects of the Web, they should do so at their own Internet outlets. They should present user-generated content in the form of product reviews on their Web sites. That’s something that is of great value, but it’s most valuable when it’s right on that retailer’s Web site.
eMarketer also reported today on a study that casts doubt on how useful UGC is. The study, the “Marketing Management Survey” by PR Week and Manning, Selvage & Lee, reports that only 12% of marketers surveyed said that UGC (which included word of mouth, online social networks, YouTube and the like) was “very important.” Only 15% of respondents had allocated at least 10% of their budget to new media and UGC - compared to 37.3% who simply didn’t know how much they’d allocated.
The real story
If you look at the full study that eMarketer highlights, there are many important takeaways that actually put UGC and Internet marketing in a positive light. For example, the study also finds that:
I don’t doubt the JupiterResearch finding that online shoppers “do not believe that [social] sites affected their purchase decisions.” However, isn’t that exactly why you should be using social media? Let’s remember how you build a brand:
Successful brands get into the mind slowly. A blurb in a magazine. A mention in a newspaper. A comment from a friend. A display in a retail store. After a slow buildup, people become convinced that they have known about a brand forever. (Laura & Al Ries, via Cindy Krum at SMX)
If consumers felt that their social media experiences were trying to overtly influence their purchases, I think they’d react negatively. Instead, subtle brand interactions build up their opinion of a brand and ultimately influence a purchase without the buyer even realizing it’s the coup d’ tat for marketers.
If you’re not in your buyers’ and potential buyers’ social sites, even you’re not actively “advertising,” you’re not effectively building your brand online. (Not to mention the often negative effects of Evans’s suggestion, user reviews on your site.)
Savvy marketers are already using UGC and social media
There are examples everywhere of effective UGC and social media campaigns. This week, Michael Gray has highlighted Disney and CareerBuilder’s UGC contest (pretty good entries, I gotta say), and Lisa Barone has listed her top three social/UGC campaigns.
So feel free to wait till next year if you’re still leery of the effectiveness of social media. Those of us who are smart enough to get in now have the opportunity to form brand relationships and ultimately influence purchases. Because, as we know, it’s the brand that counts.

Similar Stories in: Research, Social | Forward: Email This Post
Jeremy Luebke Says:
July 5th, 2007 at 8:39 pm
The problem with those studies is they reflect what the consumer consciously thinks. Most consumers do not realize how much of their actions are results of their unconscious minds. If a brand can build a good reputation through social media and a user is exposed to their brand 10-20 times in a positive manner, there is a very high probability that the user will be more likely to buy from the merchant when presented with that merchants brand in the future and in a buying mode.
Social media is the new branding platform for the Internet. Offline we have TV. Online we have social media.
Andy Beal Says:
July 5th, 2007 at 9:19 pm
Only 22% of respondents expressed willingness to give a significant share of control in shaping their marketing programs to consumers. - Yeah sorry, we regret to inform you that you marketing programs are already being shaped by consumers, so you may as well embrace them.
Search Engine Optimization Journal » Social Media Marketing Isn’t About Closing Sales Says:
July 6th, 2007 at 8:38 am
[...] Once again, the Pilgrim rocks: If consumers felt that their social media experiences were trying to overtly influence their purchases, I think they’d react negatively. Instead, subtle brand interactions build up their opinion of a brand and ultimately influence a purchase without the buyer even realizing it—the coup d’état for marketers. [...]
cottage Says:
July 6th, 2007 at 8:49 am
I’ve got to agree with Andy on this one. Come on people, get with the times. As technology advances and as customers become more ’savvy’, business will have to change to support the need. And it looks like thats what’s happening - marketing programs are being shaped and driven by customer needs/habits/wants.
Steven Bradley Says:
July 6th, 2007 at 2:27 pm
Jeremy you read my mind. What consumers say influences them and what actually influences them are two completely different things.
A consistently positive brand experience will influence people as will the reverse
10,000 Marshmallows Daily Links 2007-07-09 - 10,000 Marshmallows - Marketing Accountability: How to eat 10,000 Marshmallows Says:
July 9th, 2007 at 4:42 pm
[...] Marketing Pilgrim: Be Leery of Social Media & UGC—They Just Might Work! “92.5% would consider turning to an Internet/new media specialist for a ‘new media campaign,’ and 47.7% would turn to them first (that’s more than 2.5 times greater than the next choice, a PR agency).” [...]
New survey on social media says…. - 10,000 Marshmallows - Marketing Accountability: How to eat 10,000 Marshmallows Says:
July 9th, 2007 at 10:39 pm
[...] Here’s some more findings about UGC that Jordan McCollum culled from a new survey from PR Week and Manning, Selvage & Lee: [...]