Monday, July 30th, 2007 by Andy Beal
VentureBeat seems to understand why Cisco just acquired Five Across, a San Francisco company that helps companies build their own social networks. Unfortunately, I’m having a had time believing this is a good decision.
The move is understandable, though. Based on conversations with three or four different Cisco executives in recent months, it is clear Cisco sees social networking and the wider Web 2.0 phenomenon as ways to drive Internet traffic, and thus traffic over their routers and other networking gear - and, it follows, more revenue for Cisco.
So, Cisco plans to build social networks for its clients in the hope that they’ll then need lots of expensive routers and switches. Ok, I can see that, but why would you buy into an industry you know nothing about? Why take the risk? Surely you could just partner with a company and let them have the headache of building out the social networks. Maybe Five Across sold for peanuts, but more likely some Cisco exec got a little too wrapped up in his Facebook profile and thought it would help Cisco play with the cool kids. Meanwhile, let’s go ahead and throw up an annoying splash page - Googlebot and visitors just love those!

Similar Stories in: M&A, Social | Forward: Email This Post
Brian Chappell Says:
July 30th, 2007 at 10:48 am
I know someone who works over at the RTP Cisco unit and he was explaining to me several months ago about how Cisco is going to try and create a B2b social platform, utilizing its underlying structure already in place.
Amy Cham Says:
July 30th, 2007 at 9:35 pm
This reminds me of the leggings I bought last fall. Wasn’t quite sure what I was going to do with them, but everybody else had them…
Owen Says:
July 31st, 2007 at 5:57 am
That’s a bit of a tenuous link though really. Wouldn’t some video broadcasting service generate more internet traffic than a social networking site? Why wouldn’t they go for a YouTube clone ..