Marketing Pilgrim’s Social Channel is proudly sponsored by Full Sail University, where you can earn your Masters of Science Degree in Internet Marketing in less than 2 years. Visit FullSail.edu for more information.
Ever since Andy joined Facebook, things have been looking up for the social networking site. (What do you mean, there’s no correlation?) Today their numbers are up and there are rumors that Google should be very, very afraid.
Facebook is looking at major successes not only from their platform but also from the influx of new users this year. TechCrunch reports on comScore’s findings that over the last year:
Facebook saw an 89% increase in unique visitors to the site at 26,649,000 uniques, with a 143% increase in page views at 15.8 billion. The site’s stickiness has increased and then tapered off at about 190 minutes per average user.
Additionally, the demographics of the social network are shifting—the 18-24 demographic is the only one to occupy a smaller slice of the pie since last year. Although the college-aged group is the slowest growing, it still saw 38% growth:
| Age Segment | May 06 (000) | May 07 (000) | Percent Change |
| Total Audience Unique Visitors (000) |
14,069 | 26,649 | 89% |
| Persons: 12-17 | 1,628 | 4,060 | 149% |
| Persons: 18-24 | 5,674 | 7,843 | 38% |
| Persons: 25-34 | 1,114 | 3,134 | 181% |
| Persons: 35+ | 5,247 | 10,412 | 98% |
paidContent.org is reporting that Facebook has also hired a VP of marketing and operations, Chamath Palihapitiya, a former executive at AOL.
Should Google be running scared? AdAge seems to think so:
Just as Google has become what some people call the operating system for search, Facebook is turning itself into the operating system for social networking. While Google knows what millions of people are searching for, Facebook has something the search giant hasn’t been able to grow: a network of connections between people that creates a viral distribution platform unrivaled by any portal or search engine.
Don’t think this point hasn’t made its way to Mountain View. It has certainly made it into the New York offices of News Corp., parent of Facebook’s chief competition. When asked recently by the Wall Street Journal whether newspaper readers were going to MySpace, News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch, who shelled out in 2005 what now appears to be a bargain sum of $580 million for MySpace, didn’t mince words: “I wish they were. They’re all going to Facebook at the moment.” (Actually, although Facebook’s audience growth is outpacing that of MySpace, its total audience numbers are still less than half the 69 million unique visitors scored by Mr. Murdoch’s social network in May.)
Is Google concerned? Most likely. There’s no denying that social search is one of the most attractive avenues for the future of search. But should they really be worried?
It’s been eight weeks since we first asked “Whither Facebook?” We’re still waiting to see, and I think we’ll still be waiting a while yet.
Similar Stories in: Social | Forward: Email This Post
Alex Says:
July 9th, 2007 at 7:54 pm
Fascinating article. I wonder how the human engines may or may not play into this. Will engines like Wikia, Mahalo, InfoCream or ChaCha respond to the trend? Will sites like Facebook leverage their own search?
Heather Paquinas Says:
July 9th, 2007 at 9:22 pm
Finally, maybe they’ll rewrite orkut from <vomit>asp.net</vomit>
horisly Says:
July 10th, 2007 at 7:02 am
good post.
Andy Beal Says:
July 10th, 2007 at 10:17 am
I’m more likely responsible for the increase in the average user age, than their growth.
James Mayberry Says:
July 10th, 2007 at 11:40 am
Like any internet marketing executive worth her salt, you should read this stuff with skepticism.
Making Google quake? Give me a break. Facebook, outside of its Microsoft partnership, has no revenue model. And While Facebook is growing, its platform model isn’t all that new (see AOL launch page circa 1996). A slick interface with intriguing functionality? Sure. But when I read articles like the one in AdAge, I think, “how will they make money? free widgets?” instead of just how can i make money as a marketer? Doing so helps me understand the long term viability.
I don’t get it. Kara Swisher from the WSJ doesn’t either as she notes in this post:
http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=350&ak_action=printable
Jordan McCollum Says:
July 10th, 2007 at 11:51 am
I’m sorry, was my skepticism not conveyed by “AdAge seems to think so” and questioning the premise of their article?
Andy Beal Says:
July 10th, 2007 at 11:55 am
@James – I think Jordan and I both agree with you, and you’ll find us to be skeptical of most stuff.
Bill Hilton Says:
July 10th, 2007 at 5:18 pm
According to yesterday’s list of 100 media movers and shakers in the Guardian, which rated Facebook number 100 and rising, half of all BBC employees have a Facebook page.
Aside from revealing what they’re all doing when they should be delivering value for money on the Licence Fee (the TV tax we have to pay over here in the UK), that stat really underlines FB’s brand penetration into the 20/30-something professional demographic.
MySpace may still be bigger, but I think it’s becoming an irrelevance in terms of social search. No disrespect to the kids, but the demo it’s pitching at is too young, with the result it’s heavily skewed towards under-21s. FB have worked up a brand that appeals to a broader, and (dare I say it) more sophisticated and educated demo.
Paul Says:
July 11th, 2007 at 6:42 am
I think Facebook skeptics underestimate the position Facebook is in as the defacto operating system of college students. Virtually every college student in America uses Facebook, and when they graduate they continue to use Facebook as the hub of all their communications.
Fitness guy Says:
July 11th, 2007 at 9:35 am
I have to agree with Paul..Facebook is even promoted in the new student packets of many major colleges in the US (ie. Univ. of FL, and Univ. Cent. Florida). College age is the beginning of the market spending age.
Omadsense Says:
July 11th, 2007 at 11:03 am
well, google if it does get ‘frieghten” can afford to pay any price to aquire it. Even though it was stated the Facebook has no plans to be bought out – everyone has a price.
Hell, I would’ve sold it yesterday if I owned it [ I want to be a millionair ].
This Week In SEO - 7/13/07 - TheVanBlog Says:
July 13th, 2007 at 11:44 pm
[...] Facebook All the Rage; Scaring Google? [...]
evans ink » Blog Archive » facebook momentum redux Says:
July 16th, 2007 at 7:45 am
[...] At any rate, dig in, it’s going to be a fascinating environment. Some say it has Google-threatening potential. Hmmm. It also has the fragility that comes with a social network in transition, and transition can crash down around this kind of model. However, it’s done an awful lot right this past year. [...]
ShinyRed » Blog Archive » Links for 17-07-07 Says:
July 17th, 2007 at 4:13 am
[...] Is Facebook’s mastery of social search scaring Google? [...]
Facebook: Impressive Growth Threat To Google? Says:
July 18th, 2007 at 9:23 am
[...] Facebook: Impressive Growth Threat To Google? Marketing Pilgrim muses on TechCrunch observations and comScore’s findings on recent impressive growth of Facebook, and speculates on possible interest from Google. [...]
ugachaka.net :: the caveman speaks » Blog Archive » One to Watch: Facebook emerging as next Web world power Says:
July 30th, 2007 at 2:50 pm
[...] fears Facebook–if not, they should. Facebook has a huge user base to pull from in whatever their next [...]
Tim Long Says:
August 4th, 2007 at 10:31 pm
Facebook may be gaining on page views, but their CTR is still abysmal.
Copywriting Services and Copywriter Training Says:
December 7th, 2007 at 5:50 am
[...] fact, I already have – just not here. Check out Jordan McCollum’s excellent post on marketingpilgrim.com, which takes a careful look at whether Facebook might be stealing a march on the Big G when it [...]
Market Diffusion of Online Social Networks | Seph Skerritt's Blog Says:
March 5th, 2008 at 10:04 am
[...] fad and waste of time. However, today with Myspace and Facebook producing so much traffic, they are regarded as extremely powerful companies. An indicator of this is when in October 2007 Microsoft paid $240 million for just a 1.6% stake in [...]