<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Q2 Revenue: Only Up 58%?  Losers.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week In SEO - 7/20/07 - TheVanBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/comment-page-1#comment-29473</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week In SEO - 7/20/07 - TheVanBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html#comment-29473</guid>
		<description>[...] Google’s Q2 Revenue: Only Up 58%? Losers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google’s Q2 Revenue: Only Up 58%? Losers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Study Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/comment-page-1#comment-29443</link>
		<dc:creator>Study Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html#comment-29443</guid>
		<description>Great title Jordan! Hooked me indeed. There will come a day when Google is forgotten, I wonder when...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great title Jordan! Hooked me indeed. There will come a day when Google is forgotten, I wonder when&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eduardo Fenili</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/comment-page-1#comment-29362</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduardo Fenili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html#comment-29362</guid>
		<description>@ Rich
Actually, I would say its more like a kid with an A+ perfect score average coming home with an A+ in the 98% percentile:P  haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Rich<br />
Actually, I would say its more like a kid with an A+ perfect score average coming home with an A+ in the 98% percentile:P  haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Minx</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/comment-page-1#comment-29361</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Minx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html#comment-29361</guid>
		<description>It does seem a bit silly. I guess it&#039;s like a kid with an A+ average coming home with an A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does seem a bit silly. I guess it&#8217;s like a kid with an A+ average coming home with an A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Barrera</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/comment-page-1#comment-29359</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Barrera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html#comment-29359</guid>
		<description>Anytime you call Google &quot;losers&quot;, I am sure I am not the only one that will chuckle :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anytime you call Google &#8220;losers&#8221;, I am sure I am not the only one that will chuckle <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McCollum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/comment-page-1#comment-29353</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McCollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html#comment-29353</guid>
		<description>I gotta do my part to keep you on your toes, Andy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta do my part to keep you on your toes, Andy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/comment-page-1#comment-29345</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html#comment-29345</guid>
		<description>LOL - it was a great title, now I need to go think of some funny headlines. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL &#8211; it was a great title, now I need to go think of some funny headlines. <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bushido</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/comment-page-1#comment-29342</link>
		<dc:creator>Bushido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html#comment-29342</guid>
		<description>I agree with Janet on this one. The best headline ever in MP (no offense, Andy). The thing I don&#039;t agree on is that they&#039;re not doing well in buying every business they can get their hands on. Eventually they will own the market (literally). Am I frightened? Hell yeah! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Janet on this one. The best headline ever in MP (no offense, Andy). The thing I don&#8217;t agree on is that they&#8217;re not doing well in buying every business they can get their hands on. Eventually they will own the market (literally). Am I frightened? Hell yeah! <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TextAdSearch</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/comment-page-1#comment-29341</link>
		<dc:creator>TextAdSearch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html#comment-29341</guid>
		<description>What do they expect, there are only so many people on the planet. Maybe they will start giving free Googleputers to the third world!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do they expect, there are only so many people on the planet. Maybe they will start giving free Googleputers to the third world!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Self Made Minds &#187; Blog Archive &#187; $1 million online competition and more!&#8230;..</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/comment-page-1#comment-29339</link>
		<dc:creator>Self Made Minds &#187; Blog Archive &#187; $1 million online competition and more!&#8230;..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html#comment-29339</guid>
		<description>[...] Jordan comments over at Marketing Pilgrim, do we expect too much from Google? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jordan comments over at Marketing Pilgrim, do we expect too much from Google? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/comment-page-1#comment-29332</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 02:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html#comment-29332</guid>
		<description>Jordan I agree it&#039;s a great title. Now if only I could be as much of a loser as Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordan I agree it&#8217;s a great title. Now if only I could be as much of a loser as Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McCollum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/comment-page-1#comment-29327</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McCollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html#comment-29327</guid>
		<description>@Day--I never said tumbled.  I said it &quot;fell&quot; 7%.  

Perhaps I should have used something less &quot;dramatic,&quot; like &quot;did not go up&quot; or &quot;moved in a nonpositive fashion&quot;?

Your post is amusing :D .

@Janet--Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Day&#8211;I never said tumbled.  I said it &#8220;fell&#8221; 7%.  </p>
<p>Perhaps I should have used something less &#8220;dramatic,&#8221; like &#8220;did not go up&#8221; or &#8220;moved in a nonpositive fashion&#8221;?</p>
<p>Your post is amusing <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  .</p>
<p>@Janet&#8211;Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Driscoll Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/comment-page-1#comment-29325</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Driscoll Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html#comment-29325</guid>
		<description>Jordan, I just had to say -- LOVE the headline. Perhaps if Google were to actually FOCUS on their core revenue stream (AdWords) instead of acquiring every company they can get their hands on to try to &quot;compete&quot; with Microsoft, they might have had better earnings. Just an observation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordan, I just had to say &#8212; LOVE the headline. Perhaps if Google were to actually FOCUS on their core revenue stream (AdWords) instead of acquiring every company they can get their hands on to try to &#8220;compete&#8221; with Microsoft, they might have had better earnings. Just an observation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DayNovo</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/comment-page-1#comment-29324</link>
		<dc:creator>DayNovo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html#comment-29324</guid>
		<description>While Google certainly posted a miss today, is it fair to say that the stock &quot;tumbled&quot; after hours? For further consideration click here:
http://sneakybusiness.typepad.com/sneaky/2007/07/google-misses-s.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Google certainly posted a miss today, is it fair to say that the stock &#8220;tumbled&#8221; after hours? For further consideration click here:<br />
http://sneakybusiness.typepad.com/sneaky/2007/07/google-misses-s.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html/comment-page-1#comment-29322</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/googles-q2-revenue-only-up-58-losers.html#comment-29322</guid>
		<description>As Google&#039;s revenue numbers start to flatten, I wonder if they&#039;ll start issuing guidance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Google&#8217;s revenue numbers start to flatten, I wonder if they&#8217;ll start issuing guidance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

