<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Click Fraud a Tired Topic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:15:33 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CPCcurmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html/comment-page-1#comment-29896</link>
		<dc:creator>CPCcurmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html#comment-29896</guid>
		<description>Andy,

The advertisers make complaints such as &quot;I shouldn&#039;t have to pay for
the same user who comes to my site multiple times.&quot;  There seems to be
little acknowledgement in the search engine/ad network industry that
determining whether &quot;the same user&quot; is accessing a site cannot be done
reliably, in all circumstances.  This &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; very well understood
among members of the technical Internet community.  This is another
flaw of PPC.  Paying by fixed fees would alleviate the problem.  I am
looking forward to the day when all the engines and networks offer a
variety of payment models as options, so advertisers can best budget
for the type of traffic they&#039;re getting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p>The advertisers make complaints such as &#8220;I shouldn&#8217;t have to pay for<br />
the same user who comes to my site multiple times.&#8221;  There seems to be<br />
little acknowledgement in the search engine/ad network industry that<br />
determining whether &#8220;the same user&#8221; is accessing a site cannot be done<br />
reliably, in all circumstances.  This <b>is</b> very well understood<br />
among members of the technical Internet community.  This is another<br />
flaw of PPC.  Paying by fixed fees would alleviate the problem.  I am<br />
looking forward to the day when all the engines and networks offer a<br />
variety of payment models as options, so advertisers can best budget<br />
for the type of traffic they&#8217;re getting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html/comment-page-1#comment-29889</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html#comment-29889</guid>
		<description>@CPCcurmudgeon - if the clicks aren&#039;t fraudulent, then shouldn&#039;t we also look at the quality of the advertiser&#039;s web site? Surely they may have more to blame than the traffic Google sends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CPCcurmudgeon &#8211; if the clicks aren&#8217;t fraudulent, then shouldn&#8217;t we also look at the quality of the advertiser&#8217;s web site? Surely they may have more to blame than the traffic Google sends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPCcurmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html/comment-page-1#comment-29872</link>
		<dc:creator>CPCcurmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html#comment-29872</guid>
		<description>A few thoughts:

OK, suppose the clicks that ClickForensics are reporting aren&#039;t
fraudulent.  But they&#039;re not converting, either (at least to the
satisfaction of the advertisers they represent).  Something out there
is clicking, but not providing revenue to those advertisers.  How long
will the advertisers continue to pay for these nonconverting clicks?

If Google, Yahoo, etc. truly have technology that can detect almost
all invalid clicks (fraudulent or not), this technology would be
capable of detecting all other types of invalid (unwanted) traffic,
such as spam, phishing, stuffed All-Star ballot boxes, etc.  So let&#039;s
see these companies&#039; software adapted to solving these problems.

I have long argued that PPC is vulnerable to click fraud because of
how the underlying Internet architecture works.  People ignored me,
said I didn&#039;t &quot;get it&quot;, etc.  But it seems that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iab.org/about/workshops/unwantedtraffic/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;some people
who actually understand Internet architecture&lt;/a&gt; actually agree with
me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few thoughts:</p>
<p>OK, suppose the clicks that ClickForensics are reporting aren&#8217;t<br />
fraudulent.  But they&#8217;re not converting, either (at least to the<br />
satisfaction of the advertisers they represent).  Something out there<br />
is clicking, but not providing revenue to those advertisers.  How long<br />
will the advertisers continue to pay for these nonconverting clicks?</p>
<p>If Google, Yahoo, etc. truly have technology that can detect almost<br />
all invalid clicks (fraudulent or not), this technology would be<br />
capable of detecting all other types of invalid (unwanted) traffic,<br />
such as spam, phishing, stuffed All-Star ballot boxes, etc.  So let&#8217;s<br />
see these companies&#8217; software adapted to solving these problems.</p>
<p>I have long argued that PPC is vulnerable to click fraud because of<br />
how the underlying Internet architecture works.  People ignored me,<br />
said I didn&#8217;t &#8220;get it&#8221;, etc.  But it seems that <a href="http://www.iab.org/about/workshops/unwantedtraffic/index.html" rel="nofollow">some people<br />
who actually understand Internet architecture</a> actually agree with<br />
me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPC Hero : Click Fraud, Invalid Clicks and Everything In Between</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html/comment-page-1#comment-29537</link>
		<dc:creator>PPC Hero : Click Fraud, Invalid Clicks and Everything In Between</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html#comment-29537</guid>
		<description>[...] No matter what you call it, this is a much debated and discussed topic in the search marketing world (thus my smarmy opening comments). What can be certain is that search marketers and the search engines alike are fully aware of the danger and the threat click fraud poses to the pay-per-click industry. For the most part, advertisers have limited visibility into the true nature of any given click that they have paid for. But this is a knowledge gap that is slowly closing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No matter what you call it, this is a much debated and discussed topic in the search marketing world (thus my smarmy opening comments). What can be certain is that search marketers and the search engines alike are fully aware of the danger and the threat click fraud poses to the pay-per-click industry. For the most part, advertisers have limited visibility into the true nature of any given click that they have paid for. But this is a knowledge gap that is slowly closing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Study Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html/comment-page-1#comment-29441</link>
		<dc:creator>Study Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html#comment-29441</guid>
		<description>Nothing new really. It still depends mainly on what type of business you&#039;re running. Some have a lot of CF to deal with, while others have almost none.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing new really. It still depends mainly on what type of business you&#8217;re running. Some have a lot of CF to deal with, while others have almost none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publicz</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html/comment-page-1#comment-29422</link>
		<dc:creator>Publicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 20:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html#comment-29422</guid>
		<description>Major problem is not click fraud but inexperienced net users unintentionally clicking on the PPC ads, only impulsive buy items sell when a user unintentionally clicks on a link. 

It took about 3 years for banner advertisers(large ad agencies before 2001 crash) to realize this how long it will take PPC advertisers (mostly small biz) to realize this? one more year perhaps......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Major problem is not click fraud but inexperienced net users unintentionally clicking on the PPC ads, only impulsive buy items sell when a user unintentionally clicks on a link. </p>
<p>It took about 3 years for banner advertisers(large ad agencies before 2001 crash) to realize this how long it will take PPC advertisers (mostly small biz) to realize this? one more year perhaps&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omadsense</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html/comment-page-1#comment-29348</link>
		<dc:creator>Omadsense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html#comment-29348</guid>
		<description>Click fruad - well, i&#039;ve cut back my use of adwords becuase it seems that if google is not jacking up the price - the clicks are irrevelant [ little sales] . most may blame my short sales on my sales picth - but my free vistors who come from other sources - buy and a much higher rate.......?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Click fruad &#8211; well, i&#8217;ve cut back my use of adwords becuase it seems that if google is not jacking up the price &#8211; the clicks are irrevelant [ little sales] . most may blame my short sales on my sales picth &#8211; but my free vistors who come from other sources &#8211; buy and a much higher rate&#8230;&#8230;.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Favorite Web Browser</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html/comment-page-1#comment-29323</link>
		<dc:creator>Favorite Web Browser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html#comment-29323</guid>
		<description>Some &quot;pro thiefs&quot; are making more than x10000 USD per month from click fraud...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some &#8220;pro thiefs&#8221; are making more than x10000 USD per month from click fraud&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Churchill</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html/comment-page-1#comment-29320</link>
		<dc:creator>Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html#comment-29320</guid>
		<description>Surely there is a huge market of &quot;low scale clickfrauders&quot; whom are clicking on their own site, every so often, from different computers! It must be happening, and not everyone can be getting caught. Please explain how I may be wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely there is a huge market of &#8220;low scale clickfrauders&#8221; whom are clicking on their own site, every so often, from different computers! It must be happening, and not everyone can be getting caught. Please explain how I may be wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Favorite Web Browser</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html/comment-page-1#comment-29305</link>
		<dc:creator>Favorite Web Browser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html#comment-29305</guid>
		<description>Maybe yes, maybe no.

Depends on networks.

I&#039;ve seen fraud which looks like a 100% natural traffic, so some low tech networks just keeps paying for it. I also some some ways where even big G still pays for that fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe yes, maybe no.</p>
<p>Depends on networks.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen fraud which looks like a 100% natural traffic, so some low tech networks just keeps paying for it. I also some some ways where even big G still pays for that fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Swedal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html/comment-page-1#comment-29303</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Swedal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html#comment-29303</guid>
		<description>PPC will eventually evolve to a better system of traffic tracking.  Which will help click fraud decline in its present form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PPC will eventually evolve to a better system of traffic tracking.  Which will help click fraud decline in its present form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TextAdSearch</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html/comment-page-1#comment-29291</link>
		<dc:creator>TextAdSearch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html#comment-29291</guid>
		<description>Click fraud will be reported as long as PPC exists.

It wouldn&#039;t surprise me if Google goes CPA. In fact they have already. The only way to eradicate click fraud is not to charge per click.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Click fraud will be reported as long as PPC exists.</p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if Google goes CPA. In fact they have already. The only way to eradicate click fraud is not to charge per click.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Favorite Web Browser</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html/comment-page-1#comment-29290</link>
		<dc:creator>Favorite Web Browser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/07/is-click-fraud-a-tired-topic.html#comment-29290</guid>
		<description>I actually love to read about click fraud, not because I love click fraud, but because I know how to control it and how other companies poorly controls that :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually love to read about click fraud, not because I love click fraud, but because I know how to control it and how other companies poorly controls that <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
