<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask.com Ads: Confirmed as Creepy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:35:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2007 - A Long Year in Review &#187; Search Engine Optimization Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html/comment-page-1#comment-38524</link>
		<dc:creator>2007 - A Long Year in Review &#187; Search Engine Optimization Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 03:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html#comment-38524</guid>
		<description>[...] More issues with Ask.com series of TV ads which are confirmed creepy, weird, bizarre and entirely ineffective in US. (Marketing Pilgrim) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More issues with Ask.com series of TV ads which are confirmed creepy, weird, bizarre and entirely ineffective in US. (Marketing Pilgrim) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lunarsight</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html/comment-page-1#comment-32240</link>
		<dc:creator>Lunarsight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html#comment-32240</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s product exposure. They&#039;re definitely taking the &quot;Quiznos&quot; approach to advertising. Some of the early advertisements Quiznos unleashed upon us were downright disturbing [&#039;raised by wolves&#039;], but they definitely got Quiznos name recognition, for better or worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s product exposure. They&#8217;re definitely taking the &#8220;Quiznos&#8221; approach to advertising. Some of the early advertisements Quiznos unleashed upon us were downright disturbing ['raised by wolves'], but they definitely got Quiznos name recognition, for better or worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abstroose</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html/comment-page-1#comment-30590</link>
		<dc:creator>Abstroose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html#comment-30590</guid>
		<description>Ask.com promote with offline ads? Why do I miss these things?

I feel so left out XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask.com promote with offline ads? Why do I miss these things?</p>
<p>I feel so left out XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic Darling</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html/comment-page-1#comment-30136</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic Darling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html#comment-30136</guid>
		<description>Perhaps we only think they missed the target because we aren&#039;t part of the growing &quot;chicks with swords&quot; fetishist demographic. Has anyone checked that keyword phrase for popularity?

Anyway, Andy makes a good point. Maybe they don&#039;t want to compete directly. No one wants to challenge Goliath to a wrestling contest. Just pick up a few stones, maintain a safe distance and sling away. Or, better yet, run like hell and find a new place to stake your claim.

That said, I agree. Those ads are creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps we only think they missed the target because we aren&#8217;t part of the growing &#8220;chicks with swords&#8221; fetishist demographic. Has anyone checked that keyword phrase for popularity?</p>
<p>Anyway, Andy makes a good point. Maybe they don&#8217;t want to compete directly. No one wants to challenge Goliath to a wrestling contest. Just pick up a few stones, maintain a safe distance and sling away. Or, better yet, run like hell and find a new place to stake your claim.</p>
<p>That said, I agree. Those ads are creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Stauffer</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html/comment-page-1#comment-30125</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Stauffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 13:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html#comment-30125</guid>
		<description>We all know that &quot;sex sells&quot; but I think they missed the target with these ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know that &#8220;sex sells&#8221; but I think they missed the target with these ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html/comment-page-1#comment-30122</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html#comment-30122</guid>
		<description>@Bushido - Ask.com is owned by IAC.

Maybe they dont want to compete, maybe there&#039;s money to be made in being the &quot;freaky fetish-porn perv&quot; search engine of choice. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bushido &#8211; Ask.com is owned by IAC.</p>
<p>Maybe they dont want to compete, maybe there&#8217;s money to be made in being the &#8220;freaky fetish-porn perv&#8221; search engine of choice. <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bushido</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html/comment-page-1#comment-30119</link>
		<dc:creator>Bushido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 11:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html#comment-30119</guid>
		<description>&quot;for a mainstream search engine that hopes to compete with Google&quot;

I might be mistaken, but isn&#039;t Ask.com already acquired by Google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;for a mainstream search engine that hopes to compete with Google&#8221;</p>
<p>I might be mistaken, but isn&#8217;t Ask.com already acquired by Google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html/comment-page-1#comment-30111</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html#comment-30111</guid>
		<description>I still don&#039;t understand why Ask doesn&#039;t capitalize on its name more in its advertising. The word ask is so close to what we do when searching I would think they could easily brand themselves better by playing off the name more.

All you have to do is Ask
Just Ask
Ask the search engine

They write themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t understand why Ask doesn&#8217;t capitalize on its name more in its advertising. The word ask is so close to what we do when searching I would think they could easily brand themselves better by playing off the name more.</p>
<p>All you have to do is Ask<br />
Just Ask<br />
Ask the search engine</p>
<p>They write themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Enhancement</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html/comment-page-1#comment-30107</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Enhancement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 05:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/askcom-ads-confirmed-as-creepy.html#comment-30107</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t found Ask.com compelling in search and the ads aren&#039;t going to pull in the audience they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t found Ask.com compelling in search and the ads aren&#8217;t going to pull in the audience they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
