<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Just Keeps Getting Richer &#8212; New Change to AdWords Announced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adwords FYI- Upcoming change to the top ad placement formula - WebProWorld</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-30491</link>
		<dc:creator>Adwords FYI- Upcoming change to the top ad placement formula - WebProWorld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html#comment-30491</guid>
		<description>[...] Upcoming change to the top ad placement formula     Surprised to comments here yet. More here:  Google Just Keeps Getting Richer &#8212; New Change to AdWords Announced  I REALLY hope when they do this they increase quality score as well. We dont want to see smaller [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Upcoming change to the top ad placement formula     Surprised to comments here yet. More here:  Google Just Keeps Getting Richer &#8212; New Change to AdWords Announced  I REALLY hope when they do this they increase quality score as well. We dont want to see smaller [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ödev sitesi</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-30360</link>
		<dc:creator>ödev sitesi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 22:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html#comment-30360</guid>
		<description>Google’s helping advertisers and this will go well for advertisers and they will get higher results as well. And google getting richer because of companies not users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google’s helping advertisers and this will go well for advertisers and they will get higher results as well. And google getting richer because of companies not users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-30333</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html#comment-30333</guid>
		<description>AdWords is a great tool for advertising but since google does everything for money it looks more and more like a big fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AdWords is a great tool for advertising but since google does everything for money it looks more and more like a big fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-30289</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 03:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html#comment-30289</guid>
		<description>This is the very thing Google tried to get away from and gave smb&#039;s the ability to survive in the past. My campaigns have great quality scores and have even seen lower cpc rates for the same performance. Now I am concerned that it will take even more effort to realize a positive ROI from my Google keywords. I think there will be a quick flashpoint that will take out many advertisers who don&#039;t want to battle over higher max bids. There is always an exception to every rule that Google makes, it will be interesting to see who can figure out those &quot;exceptions&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the very thing Google tried to get away from and gave smb&#8217;s the ability to survive in the past. My campaigns have great quality scores and have even seen lower cpc rates for the same performance. Now I am concerned that it will take even more effort to realize a positive ROI from my Google keywords. I think there will be a quick flashpoint that will take out many advertisers who don&#8217;t want to battle over higher max bids. There is always an exception to every rule that Google makes, it will be interesting to see who can figure out those &#8220;exceptions&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Searchquant</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-30272</link>
		<dc:creator>Searchquant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 17:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html#comment-30272</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a total disconnect in Google&#039;s messaging on this change. They say that in addition to giving advertisers more control over how to get their ads in top position, it will *also* improve quality of ads in top spots by making the pool of ads that can *attain* top position larger. But if increasing that pool just comes down to people raising max CPCs, then how does that improve quality? Realistically, it&#039;ll probably be quality neutral or even negative, at least until advertiser natural selection kicks in. 

Anyone care to venture what % of clicks go to the top ad position on Google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a total disconnect in Google&#8217;s messaging on this change. They say that in addition to giving advertisers more control over how to get their ads in top position, it will *also* improve quality of ads in top spots by making the pool of ads that can *attain* top position larger. But if increasing that pool just comes down to people raising max CPCs, then how does that improve quality? Realistically, it&#8217;ll probably be quality neutral or even negative, at least until advertiser natural selection kicks in. </p>
<p>Anyone care to venture what % of clicks go to the top ad position on Google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markus941</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-30264</link>
		<dc:creator>markus941</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html#comment-30264</guid>
		<description>I wonder how many people will look at this and take Google&#039;s spin at face value.

I guess we&#039;ll have to wait and see what effect this will end up having, but at first glance it comes across as purely profit-centric on G&#039;s part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how many people will look at this and take Google&#8217;s spin at face value.</p>
<p>I guess we&#8217;ll have to wait and see what effect this will end up having, but at first glance it comes across as purely profit-centric on G&#8217;s part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bushido</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-30242</link>
		<dc:creator>Bushido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html#comment-30242</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just a matter of time before they start selling the #1 rank in &quot;organic&quot; search results to the highest bidder. Oh, well *sigh*.

BTW: I screwed up the spam protection sum question. This is my second intent. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just a matter of time before they start selling the #1 rank in &#8220;organic&#8221; search results to the highest bidder. Oh, well *sigh*.</p>
<p>BTW: I screwed up the spam protection sum question. This is my second intent. <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shay</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-30230</link>
		<dc:creator>Shay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 04:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html#comment-30230</guid>
		<description>Sorry - I meant Janet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8211; I meant Janet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shay</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-30229</link>
		<dc:creator>Shay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 04:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html#comment-30229</guid>
		<description>Good call here Andy. Usually Google has pretty good reasoning when making a big change to any of their ad ranking formulas - this time I see a bunch of fluff that sounds more like $$ motives.  

I predict an outcry from the small business advertisers, and a scale-back on Google&#039;s part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good call here Andy. Usually Google has pretty good reasoning when making a big change to any of their ad ranking formulas &#8211; this time I see a bunch of fluff that sounds more like $$ motives.  </p>
<p>I predict an outcry from the small business advertisers, and a scale-back on Google&#8217;s part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaan Kanellis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-30227</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaan Kanellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 03:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html#comment-30227</guid>
		<description>No doubt that it could help the bigger budgets over the better landing pages somewhat, but I gotta feel that quality score is more important than most may think.

I have seen campaigns run at a very low CPC with high relevance and &quot;near perfect&quot; landing pages that would easily out rank much higher bidded ads. 

Should be interesting to watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt that it could help the bigger budgets over the better landing pages somewhat, but I gotta feel that quality score is more important than most may think.</p>
<p>I have seen campaigns run at a very low CPC with high relevance and &#8220;near perfect&#8221; landing pages that would easily out rank much higher bidded ads. </p>
<p>Should be interesting to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-30226</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html#comment-30226</guid>
		<description>Google&#039;s helping advertisers? Whats next? Hopefully this will go well for advertisers and they will get higher results as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s helping advertisers? Whats next? Hopefully this will go well for advertisers and they will get higher results as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affiliate Fortune Cookies &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tips: Google Change to AdWords</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-30225</link>
		<dc:creator>Affiliate Fortune Cookies &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tips: Google Change to AdWords</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 01:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html#comment-30225</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Just Keeps Getting Richer ? New Change to AdWords Announced   var bz_url=&#039;http%3A%2F%2Faffiliatefortunecookies.com%2Ftips-google-change-to-adwords%2F&#039;; var bz_num_comments=0; var bz_comment_date=&#039;&#039;; var bz_bgcolor=&#039;fff&#039;; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Just Keeps Getting Richer ? New Change to AdWords Announced   var bz_url=&#8217;http%3A%2F%2Faffiliatefortunecookies.com%2Ftips-google-change- to-adwords%2F&#8217;; var bz_num_comments=0; var bz_comment_date=&#8221;; var bz_bgcolor=&#8217;fff&#8217;; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Driscoll Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-30224</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Driscoll Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 01:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html#comment-30224</guid>
		<description>Someone recently reminded me that I should be thankful that Google makes all of these changes -- I guess it does offer me some job security!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone recently reminded me that I should be thankful that Google makes all of these changes &#8212; I guess it does offer me some job security!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-30222</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 01:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-just-keep-getting-richer-new-change-to-adwords-announced.html#comment-30222</guid>
		<description>Janet you&#039;re not supposed to question Google&#039;s motives - it&#039;s only ever for our own good. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janet you&#8217;re not supposed to question Google&#8217;s motives &#8211; it&#8217;s only ever for our own good. <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

