<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google News Adds Comments: Why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-news-adds-comments-why.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-news-adds-comments-why.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week In SEO - 8/10/07 - TheVanBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-news-adds-comments-why.html/comment-page-1#comment-30439</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week In SEO - 8/10/07 - TheVanBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-news-adds-comments-why.html#comment-30439</guid>
		<description>[...] Google News Adds Comments: Why? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google News Adds Comments: Why? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Idealist</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-news-adds-comments-why.html/comment-page-1#comment-30245</link>
		<dc:creator>The Idealist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-news-adds-comments-why.html#comment-30245</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not bad to allow comments on the news stories. I think anytime you engage the online community it&#039;s a good thing. I think there may need some oversight so comments that don&#039;t add anything to the discussion, use profanity, or try to sell a product, are deleted before everyone gets to see them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not bad to allow comments on the news stories. I think anytime you engage the online community it&#8217;s a good thing. I think there may need some oversight so comments that don&#8217;t add anything to the discussion, use profanity, or try to sell a product, are deleted before everyone gets to see them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaan Kanellis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-news-adds-comments-why.html/comment-page-1#comment-30217</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaan Kanellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 22:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-news-adds-comments-why.html#comment-30217</guid>
		<description>Seems like a big opportunity for SPAM.

Also how do they pick the &quot;actual participants&quot;.  By hand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a big opportunity for SPAM.</p>
<p>Also how do they pick the &#8220;actual participants&#8221;.  By hand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-news-adds-comments-why.html/comment-page-1#comment-30211</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-news-adds-comments-why.html#comment-30211</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guessing Google sees it as a way to get more people using Google News by allowing them more interaction.

It does seem like spam waiting to happen, though the lack of any links is probably meant to combat the spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing Google sees it as a way to get more people using Google News by allowing them more interaction.</p>
<p>It does seem like spam waiting to happen, though the lack of any links is probably meant to combat the spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#124; Ugh!!&#8217;s Greymatter Honeypot</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-news-adds-comments-why.html/comment-page-1#comment-30209</link>
		<dc:creator>&#124; Ugh!!&#8217;s Greymatter Honeypot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-news-adds-comments-why.html#comment-30209</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what this means, with people picking out different points of interest. From the fact that comments will not have a link to the commentor&#8217;s website, to the impact this move has on jounalism to why the story was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Barrera</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-news-adds-comments-why.html/comment-page-1#comment-30206</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Barrera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/google-news-adds-comments-why.html#comment-30206</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what to make of this.  Seems like there is something up Google&#039;s sleeve besides just another page to put their ads on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what to make of this.  Seems like there is something up Google&#8217;s sleeve besides just another page to put their ads on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

