<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GoogleBot Understands Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilker Karaagac</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-74467</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilker Karaagac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 22:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-74467</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.garantitatil.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.garantitatil.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;ssuming the deal is around $20m, Rev/employee and company value/employee are identical to GOOG. Avid gets $2m in earnings on $5m in revs and a good property for $20m…not bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.garantitatil.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.garantitatil.com</a><br />ssuming the deal is around $20m, Rev/employee and company value/employee are identical to GOOG. Avid gets $2m in earnings on $5m in revs and a good property for $20m…not bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manny</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-52557</link>
		<dc:creator>Manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-52557</guid>
		<description>Very funny all the people spamming this, lol  may be you should have the nofollow on?

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very funny all the people spamming this, lol  may be you should have the nofollow on?</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiralama</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-52286</link>
		<dc:creator>kiralama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-52286</guid>
		<description>very nice but perceptive post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice but perceptive post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NinjaClitorisEnlargement</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-47483</link>
		<dc:creator>NinjaClitorisEnlargement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 08:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-47483</guid>
		<description>Perceptive post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perceptive post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NinjaPenisEnlargement</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-47482</link>
		<dc:creator>NinjaPenisEnlargement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 08:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-47482</guid>
		<description>Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NinjaTickets--Comparison shop event tickets</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-38357</link>
		<dc:creator>NinjaTickets--Comparison shop event tickets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 06:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-38357</guid>
		<description>Great Post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stor perde</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-36870</link>
		<dc:creator>stor perde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-36870</guid>
		<description>I’ll admit that there are people who try to get thru with silly comments like “great post !” but it’s a minority</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ll admit that there are people who try to get thru with silly comments like “great post !” but it’s a minority</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur mcbeth</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-32157</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur mcbeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-32157</guid>
		<description>I like to use Googlebot in the tag. I believe the bot likes to see its name.

meta name=&quot;googlebot&quot; content=&quot;index, follow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to use Googlebot in the tag. I believe the bot likes to see its name.</p>
<p>meta name=&#8221;googlebot&#8221; content=&#8221;index, follow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perde</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-31936</link>
		<dc:creator>Perde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-31936</guid>
		<description>I highly doubt if Google understands comments. Google can&#039;t even detect hidden keywords, which is one of the oldest form of spamming, and in some cases send visitors to spammed page just because some 1px hidden keyword is there. Everyone is talking about improved algorithm but still some guys spam with the same methods used a decade back and get away with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I highly doubt if Google understands comments. Google can&#8217;t even detect hidden keywords, which is one of the oldest form of spamming, and in some cases send visitors to spammed page just because some 1px hidden keyword is there. Everyone is talking about improved algorithm but still some guys spam with the same methods used a decade back and get away with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perde</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-31934</link>
		<dc:creator>Perde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-31934</guid>
		<description>I think there is nothing wrong with giving Google juice to commentors. Besides, nofollow does not stop automated messages as was said so nofollow for blogs is not a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is nothing wrong with giving Google juice to commentors. Besides, nofollow does not stop automated messages as was said so nofollow for blogs is not a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It's Really This Easy To Add A Link To Your Comment - Dawud Miracle @ dmiracle.com -</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-31425</link>
		<dc:creator>It's Really This Easy To Add A Link To Your Comment - Dawud Miracle @ dmiracle.com -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-31425</guid>
		<description>[...] Also, one further note. Some blogware will not let you add HTML to your comments. So try it and if you get a message that HTML is not accepted, you&#8217;ll know. Trying it won&#8217;t hurt anything. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also, one further note. Some blogware will not let you add HTML to your comments. So try it and if you get a message that HTML is not accepted, you&#8217;ll know. Trying it won&#8217;t hurt anything. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nhu-Chi</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-31348</link>
		<dc:creator>Nhu-Chi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-31348</guid>
		<description>According to a panelist at the SES Conference, Google&#039;s push for nofollow blogs is a ploy, their real intentions for nofollow is to regulate text link ads. So your argument is very valid. Google is more than capable of separating spam and real content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a panelist at the SES Conference, Google&#8217;s push for nofollow blogs is a ploy, their real intentions for nofollow is to regulate text link ads. So your argument is very valid. Google is more than capable of separating spam and real content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airey</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-31322</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-31322</guid>
		<description>I was about to mention that you linked to the spam list without nofollow.

What I find funny is that people are installing DoFollow Plugins and asking to be included on the PDF list, like it will bring them some kind of fame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was about to mention that you linked to the spam list without nofollow.</p>
<p>What I find funny is that people are installing DoFollow Plugins and asking to be included on the PDF list, like it will bring them some kind of fame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-31310</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-31310</guid>
		<description>SEOmoz does have a comments feed - it is a blogwide implementation though, all or nothing which you can become overwhelmed with in a matter of hours, if not days.

That spammer has been touting that junk PDF in loads of forums, but the spammers are extremely easy to spot because they don&#039;t realise that the community is fairly self policing, and subscribe to comments.
When you see 3 or 4 comments from the same person appear in your email box in a matter of minutes, you know someone is working down a list.

I am sure we will hit 400 members in the community on Bumpzee soon, more than twice the number as is included on the spammer list (who you linked to without nofollow?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEOmoz does have a comments feed &#8211; it is a blogwide implementation though, all or nothing which you can become overwhelmed with in a matter of hours, if not days.</p>
<p>That spammer has been touting that junk PDF in loads of forums, but the spammers are extremely easy to spot because they don&#8217;t realise that the community is fairly self policing, and subscribe to comments.<br />
When you see 3 or 4 comments from the same person appear in your email box in a matter of minutes, you know someone is working down a list.</p>
<p>I am sure we will hit 400 members in the community on Bumpzee soon, more than twice the number as is included on the spammer list (who you linked to without nofollow?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sante</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-31307</link>
		<dc:creator>Sante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-31307</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I have to disagree with you about NOFOLLOW attracting more spammers. I removed the NOFOLLOW about 3 months ago, maybe more. There hasn&#039;t been a spike in spam, it&#039;s business as usual as far as my blog is concerned. 

I&#039;ll admit that there are people who try to get thru with silly comments like &quot;great post !&quot; but it&#039;s a minority. 

People aren&#039;t all like me or you and won&#039;t go out of their way to leave a comment just for the sake of leaving one - without the NOFOLLOW your blog answers the fundamental question:

WHAT&#039;S IN IT FOR ME?

and your answer is - A LINK 

So it works both ways, you get a comment as a token of appreciation of your work as a blogger, and they get a quality link - that&#039;s the way it works in a business, you give and you get ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I have to disagree with you about NOFOLLOW attracting more spammers. I removed the NOFOLLOW about 3 months ago, maybe more. There hasn&#8217;t been a spike in spam, it&#8217;s business as usual as far as my blog is concerned. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll admit that there are people who try to get thru with silly comments like &#8220;great post !&#8221; but it&#8217;s a minority. </p>
<p>People aren&#8217;t all like me or you and won&#8217;t go out of their way to leave a comment just for the sake of leaving one &#8211; without the NOFOLLOW your blog answers the fundamental question:</p>
<p>WHAT&#8217;S IN IT FOR ME?</p>
<p>and your answer is &#8211; A LINK </p>
<p>So it works both ways, you get a comment as a token of appreciation of your work as a blogger, and they get a quality link &#8211; that&#8217;s the way it works in a business, you give and you get &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Eaves</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-31285</link>
		<dc:creator>David Eaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-31285</guid>
		<description>I know of some sites that are ranking pretty well off do follow blog comments, I know this one guy who has gone around calling himself SEO something and targeting do follow blogs, he has got a very good rank on Google from it. Google needs to put more weight on high quality paid directories, ones that have editorial integrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know of some sites that are ranking pretty well off do follow blog comments, I know this one guy who has gone around calling himself SEO something and targeting do follow blogs, he has got a very good rank on Google from it. Google needs to put more weight on high quality paid directories, ones that have editorial integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Barrera</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-31264</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Barrera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-31264</guid>
		<description>Jeremy - Thanks for your thoughts.  I always enjoy reading your articles as they tend to go a bit deeper than what everyone else is posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy &#8211; Thanks for your thoughts.  I always enjoy reading your articles as they tend to go a bit deeper than what everyone else is posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Luebke</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-31262</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Luebke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-31262</guid>
		<description>@Mark

This is not the first example I have seen of these. They have been happening for a long time, I just finally got around to blogging about it.

I definitely do not think they took the time to include SEOmoz as a special case. That wouldn&#039;t make any sense. I see what you mean about the Naylor title. I doubt Naylor is pinging Google blog search with it&#039;s comment feed though, so that means that Google went out of the way to read the comment feed if that is the case. 

The phenomenon seems restricted to blog search where it is actually useful. There is not much real use for linking to anchor tags in normal search. That doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s not used in the main algo though.

As for whether they are treating comments differently than content, I&#039;m not sure. But it seems that they definitely have the ability to.


@FREE SONY PS3 LOL (not spam)

The only thing silly here is calling someone else&#039;s position silly anonymously with that sort of name. Did you even bother to read the entire article and comprehend what the actual topic was about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark</p>
<p>This is not the first example I have seen of these. They have been happening for a long time, I just finally got around to blogging about it.</p>
<p>I definitely do not think they took the time to include SEOmoz as a special case. That wouldn&#8217;t make any sense. I see what you mean about the Naylor title. I doubt Naylor is pinging Google blog search with it&#8217;s comment feed though, so that means that Google went out of the way to read the comment feed if that is the case. </p>
<p>The phenomenon seems restricted to blog search where it is actually useful. There is not much real use for linking to anchor tags in normal search. That doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s not used in the main algo though.</p>
<p>As for whether they are treating comments differently than content, I&#8217;m not sure. But it seems that they definitely have the ability to.</p>
<p>@FREE SONY PS3 LOL (not spam)</p>
<p>The only thing silly here is calling someone else&#8217;s position silly anonymously with that sort of name. Did you even bother to read the entire article and comprehend what the actual topic was about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Barrera</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-31254</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Barrera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-31254</guid>
		<description>I have held the same theory as you that Google might have the ability to determine what part of a page&#039;s copy is user contributed comments.

I am still looking for proof that they are actually treating comments any different from the rest of a page.

In your Naylor example, it looks like Googlebot was crawling the Comments RSS feed and saw your name and notified you.  Does this mean that they actually know that it is a comment and should be treated differently or is it just another feed to them that they need to index?  I don&#039;t think this one presents enough proof of treating the comment differently.

In the SEOmoz example, they don&#039;t have a comment feed, but they do have permalinks for each individual commment.  This is the one that really supports your belief because the title of the link that you got from your alert is not given in a feed or anywhere else like it was in the Naylor example.  Do you think Google has done a manual job on this one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have held the same theory as you that Google might have the ability to determine what part of a page&#8217;s copy is user contributed comments.</p>
<p>I am still looking for proof that they are actually treating comments any different from the rest of a page.</p>
<p>In your Naylor example, it looks like Googlebot was crawling the Comments RSS feed and saw your name and notified you.  Does this mean that they actually know that it is a comment and should be treated differently or is it just another feed to them that they need to index?  I don&#8217;t think this one presents enough proof of treating the comment differently.</p>
<p>In the SEOmoz example, they don&#8217;t have a comment feed, but they do have permalinks for each individual commment.  This is the one that really supports your belief because the title of the link that you got from your alert is not given in a feed or anywhere else like it was in the Naylor example.  Do you think Google has done a manual job on this one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-31233</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/googlebot-understands-comments.html#comment-31233</guid>
		<description>Hey, GoogleBot. I&#039;m a comment. Nice to meet you! Do you understand me? If so could you please do your job a little bit faster?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, GoogleBot. I&#8217;m a comment. Nice to meet you! Do you understand me? If so could you please do your job a little bit faster?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

