<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linky Goodness, August 31</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/linky-goodness-august-31.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/linky-goodness-august-31.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:54:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/linky-goodness-august-31.html/comment-page-1#comment-31479</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 04:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/linky-goodness-august-31.html#comment-31479</guid>
		<description>The Economist article was interesting, especially the mention of a possible strategy for Google to become more transparent. I know a lot of us would like to see more transparency where Google is concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Economist article was interesting, especially the mention of a possible strategy for Google to become more transparent. I know a lot of us would like to see more transparency where Google is concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/linky-goodness-august-31.html/comment-page-1#comment-31476</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 23:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/linky-goodness-august-31.html#comment-31476</guid>
		<description>Well, I stick to Yahoo for my actually searching, but check Google for my rankings of sites - go figure, huh?

Oh, and watch for the Pope announcing that Google is officially evil in the eyes of the Church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I stick to Yahoo for my actually searching, but check Google for my rankings of sites &#8211; go figure, huh?</p>
<p>Oh, and watch for the Pope announcing that Google is officially evil in the eyes of the Church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McCollum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/linky-goodness-august-31.html/comment-page-1#comment-31473</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McCollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 20:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/linky-goodness-august-31.html#comment-31473</guid>
		<description>Well, if you&#039;d bother to click through on the links, you&#039;d see that:

&quot;Google Search led with a retention rate of 79 percent, followed by Yahoo! Search at 69 percent and MSN/Windows Live Search with 65 percent. . .

&quot;Notably though, a substantial portion of visitors went to more than one of these three search sites in July. MSN/Windows Live Search had the highest audience overlap, with 84 percent of its unique visitors also going to Google Search, Yahoo! Search, or both. Yahoo! Search had a 78 percent audience overlap with Google and/or MSN, while Google Search had a 63 percent audience overlap with one or both of its two primary competitors.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you&#8217;d bother to click through on the links, you&#8217;d see that:</p>
<p>&#8220;Google Search led with a retention rate of 79 percent, followed by Yahoo! Search at 69 percent and MSN/Windows Live Search with 65 percent. . .</p>
<p>&#8220;Notably though, a substantial portion of visitors went to more than one of these three search sites in July. MSN/Windows Live Search had the highest audience overlap, with 84 percent of its unique visitors also going to Google Search, Yahoo! Search, or both. Yahoo! Search had a 78 percent audience overlap with Google and/or MSN, while Google Search had a 63 percent audience overlap with one or both of its two primary competitors.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogs for Money</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/linky-goodness-august-31.html/comment-page-1#comment-31472</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogs for Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 17:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/linky-goodness-august-31.html#comment-31472</guid>
		<description>&quot;Lots of people use Google: but lots use more than one search engine&quot;

&quot;lots&quot; is a bit vague. I suspect it&#039;s a very small percentage compared to those that use just one (and just Google, at that!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lots of people use Google: but lots use more than one search engine&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;lots&#8221; is a bit vague. I suspect it&#8217;s a very small percentage compared to those that use just one (and just Google, at that!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everyday Weekender</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/linky-goodness-august-31.html/comment-page-1#comment-31450</link>
		<dc:creator>Everyday Weekender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 16:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/08/linky-goodness-august-31.html#comment-31450</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the links Jordan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links Jordan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
