Marketing Pilgrim’s Social Channel is proudly sponsored by Full Sail University, where you can earn your Masters of Science Degree in Internet Marketing in less than 2 years. Visit FullSail.edu for more information.
In a BBC Radio 4 interview [podcast], Vint Cerf – known as one of the founding fathers of the Internet – protested that the Internet is merely reflecting society not leading it…
[The net] should not be used as a scapegoat for society’s ills
Cerf, now Vice President and Chief Internet Evangelist for Google, confirms the Search giant does not have nor wants the responsibility of censoring the Internet, but will respond appropriately to legal issues identified by relevant authorities – citing Google’s position in China as a prime example.
Anyone regulating beyond what was clearly illegal put themselves on a “slippery slope” that could limit freedom of expression.
His comments come after the UK’s Conservative Party proposed ideas to curb the access young people have to sites such as YouTube. Google (owner of YouTube) and other Social Networking sites have been heavily criticised in the UK Press for not excercising their self-regulation policies (where users flag offensive content) in a more timely fashion.
But Cerf rejects ideas of imposing constraints and suggests that these kind of issues should be rooted out organically:
We have a job to do, collectively as a society, to deal with the problems we discover… but suppressing the knowledge of what’s going on isn’t going to help us.
Similar Stories in: General, Social | Forward: Email This Post
Omad Says:
August 30th, 2007 at 10:22 am
What a cunumbrum???? the do no evil copany is affiliated with evil and they say it’s not thier fualt.
Here’s a video where criminals use google in order to commit thier crime:
http://www.omadsense.com/myopinionon/id15.html
Rod B Says:
October 13th, 2007 at 8:23 am
The UK’s comments were “…Social Networking sites have been heavily criticised in the UK Press for not excercising their self-regulation policies (where users flag offensive content) in a more timely fashion…”
Flagging of content is determined by each individual. Don’t these people stop and think that just maybe no one else finds these things offensive?