<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Netscape, We Hardly Knew Ye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html/comment-page-1#comment-38716</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 20:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html#comment-38716</guid>
		<description>I get quite a bit of traffic from the new netscape, cheers for them. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get quite a bit of traffic from the new netscape, cheers for them. <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html/comment-page-1#comment-31808</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html#comment-31808</guid>
		<description>The question is whether or not this is really being done in response to what users want or what Netscape wants. If they are reacting to what their users want then it&#039;s the right thing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is whether or not this is really being done in response to what users want or what Netscape wants. If they are reacting to what their users want then it&#8217;s the right thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yosax</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html/comment-page-1#comment-31797</link>
		<dc:creator>yosax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html#comment-31797</guid>
		<description>netscape is the best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>netscape is the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Lander</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html/comment-page-1#comment-31765</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Lander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html#comment-31765</guid>
		<description>Netscape&#039;s rebirth, if you&#039;d even want to call it that, was little more than a stepping stone for Calacanis.  He&#039;s obsessed with over-marketing everything.  He did really well with Netscape.  Once he left though, the decline began.  The same is true too though now with his Mahalo project.  He&#039;s over hyping it, allowing the users and social aspects dictate growth and progress.

A year from now, I&#039;m willing to bet that too will be dead in the water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netscape&#8217;s rebirth, if you&#8217;d even want to call it that, was little more than a stepping stone for Calacanis.  He&#8217;s obsessed with over-marketing everything.  He did really well with Netscape.  Once he left though, the decline began.  The same is true too though now with his Mahalo project.  He&#8217;s over hyping it, allowing the users and social aspects dictate growth and progress.</p>
<p>A year from now, I&#8217;m willing to bet that too will be dead in the water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bushido</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html/comment-page-1#comment-31756</link>
		<dc:creator>Bushido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html#comment-31756</guid>
		<description>I agree with webmaster money and joeychgo. Netscape is kinda like Yahoo! in some way, trying to compete with the big fish to win back their market share. I don&#039;t think they&#039;ll make it, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with webmaster money and joeychgo. Netscape is kinda like Yahoo! in some way, trying to compete with the big fish to win back their market share. I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll make it, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joeychgo</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html/comment-page-1#comment-31731</link>
		<dc:creator>Joeychgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html#comment-31731</guid>
		<description>I have forgotton about netscape well. It would be nice to see them grow again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have forgotton about netscape well. It would be nice to see them grow again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webmaster Money</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html/comment-page-1#comment-31720</link>
		<dc:creator>Webmaster Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html#comment-31720</guid>
		<description>I almost forgot about Netscape. It is good that is is doing something to compete with others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I almost forgot about Netscape. It is good that is is doing something to compete with others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy and sell</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html/comment-page-1#comment-31702</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy and sell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 20:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html#comment-31702</guid>
		<description>I guess they can&#039;t really carry one being userpowered with the huge spam issue they are having. Half the stories on the front page get fake votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess they can&#8217;t really carry one being userpowered with the huge spam issue they are having. Half the stories on the front page get fake votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html/comment-page-1#comment-31681</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 23:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/09/netscape-we-hardly-knew-ye.html#comment-31681</guid>
		<description>Wow, it truly is refreshing to see someone embrace the realization that not EVERY site has to be web 2.0 ajaxalicious. These things are a great direction for some sites on the web, but sometimes, as Netscape has heard, people just want to &quot;read stuff on pages&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it truly is refreshing to see someone embrace the realization that not EVERY site has to be web 2.0 ajaxalicious. These things are a great direction for some sites on the web, but sometimes, as Netscape has heard, people just want to &#8220;read stuff on pages&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

