Comments on: Google Reduces PageRank of Many Sites http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html Internet Marketing News Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: The Click2Map™ Blog » Blog Archive » SMBs’ Confusion with Online Social Promotion Tools http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-51548 The Click2Map™ Blog » Blog Archive » SMBs’ Confusion with Online Social Promotion Tools Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:48:51 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-51548 [...] the whole Web 2.0 is a gray area: The line between power users and system gamers is too thin. The PageRank fiasco that hit Google a few month back reflects the same problematic. Is Robert Scoble gaming the system [...] [...] the whole Web 2.0 is a gray area: The line between power users and system gamers is too thin. The PageRank fiasco that hit Google a few month back reflects the same problematic. Is Robert Scoble gaming the system [...]

]]> By: Tina http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-42082 Tina Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:12:39 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-42082 I've lose my blogs on blogger with unclear reason, I've appealed it to google, but they don't respond me yet. I’ve lose my blogs on blogger with unclear reason, I’ve appealed it to google, but they don’t respond me yet.

]]> By: Fery http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-42081 Fery Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:11:34 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-42081 It's huge disaster for those sites I think. PR shows the popularity of the site, isn't it? It’s huge disaster for those sites I think. PR shows the popularity of the site, isn’t it?

]]> By: Let’s hear it for mediocre | Cosmos http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-41639 Let’s hear it for mediocre | Cosmos Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:43:22 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-41639 [...] sure you’ve all read how many “top blogs”; ProBlogger, AdesBlog, Quickonlinetips, Uncle Tom Cobley and all [1] have been knocked off their perches with Google PR losses, typically PR 6/7 down to PR [...] [...] sure you’ve all read how many “top blogs”; ProBlogger, AdesBlog, Quickonlinetips, Uncle Tom Cobley and all [1] have been knocked off their perches with Google PR losses, typically PR 6/7 down to PR [...]

]]> By: Andy Beard http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-35084 Andy Beard Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:58:48 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-35084 That little green bar can have all kinds of weird knock on effects. Whilst today I am the centre of attention (before the Facebook deal) on Techmeme, maybe their algo uses TBPR a little. All those nice tables that send you 10 visitors per day start to add up to 50-100 visitors a day that are often potential new subscribers. Am I enough of an authority for others to want to tempt me to link back to them on a story, or will they look elsewhere hoping for a reciprocal link? 2 weeks ago I speculated that I might not be passing pagerank, though it is hard to determine as there are other factors such as my expading tag clouds, and the pages I gain lots of links on also reciprocating with the dofollow trackbacks. That little green bar can have all kinds of weird knock on effects.

Whilst today I am the centre of attention (before the Facebook deal) on Techmeme, maybe their algo uses TBPR a little.

All those nice tables that send you 10 visitors per day start to add up to 50-100 visitors a day that are often potential new subscribers.

Am I enough of an authority for others to want to tempt me to link back to them on a story, or will they look elsewhere hoping for a reciprocal link?

2 weeks ago I speculated that I might not be passing pagerank, though it is hard to determine as there are other factors such as my expading tag clouds, and the pages I gain lots of links on also reciprocating with the dofollow trackbacks.

]]> By: Jason Bartholme http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-35081 Jason Bartholme Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:11:11 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-35081 My blog is going from a PR5 to PR3. I've been sick to my stomach all day. My blog is going from a PR5 to PR3. I’ve been sick to my stomach all day.

]]> By: Andy Beal http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-35080 Andy Beal Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:08:11 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-35080 @Brian - I'm still seeing the reduced PR numbers. @Brian – I’m still seeing the reduced PR numbers.

]]> By: Brian Chappell http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-35077 Brian Chappell Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:51:27 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-35077 I am showing all the aforementioned sites back to their original PR. I am showing all the aforementioned sites back to their original PR.

]]> By: Steven Bradley http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-35062 Steven Bradley Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:21:23 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-35062 Paid links are the obvious culprit, though it's an interesting list of sites. Hard to imagine their PR going down other than through a Google penalty of some kind. Paid links are the obvious culprit, though it’s an interesting list of sites. Hard to imagine their PR going down other than through a Google penalty of some kind.

]]> By: Ciaran http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-35050 Ciaran Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:51:31 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-35050 @Jaan yes - my bad; I missed out paid... @Jaan

yes – my bad; I missed out paid…

]]> By: Jaan Kanellis http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-35047 Jaan Kanellis Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:21:32 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-35047 All about offering PAID links right Ciaran? All about offering PAID links right Ciaran?

]]> By: Fionn http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-35045 Fionn Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:02:35 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-35045 Interesting. Google has said repeatedly that they will find a way to penalize sites selling links maybe it was not the FUD everybody keeps calling it and they were actually serious. They have wall to wall PHD's it cant be that hard to figure out. Interesting. Google has said repeatedly that they will find a way to penalize sites selling links maybe it was not the FUD everybody keeps calling it and they were actually serious. They have wall to wall PHD’s it cant be that hard to figure out.

]]> By: Ciaran http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-35035 Ciaran Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:06:56 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-35035 The fact that New Scientist, the site that Danny 'outed' (a term I disagree with btw) has also dropped to 5 (I think that it was on 7 or 8) suggests that it's all about the links... The fact that New Scientist, the site that Danny ‘outed’ (a term I disagree with btw) has also dropped to 5 (I think that it was on 7 or 8) suggests that it’s all about the links…

]]> By: Brian Chappell http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-35032 Brian Chappell Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:00:20 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-35032 I found some others as well. Checking there rankings for terms, no noticeable difference what so ever. I found some others as well. Checking there rankings for terms, no noticeable difference what so ever.

]]> By: paqo http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-35029 paqo Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:44:00 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-35029 http://www.webrankinfo.com/ PR7 to 4 http://www.webrankinfo.com/ PR7 to 4

]]> By: Brian Chappell http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-35026 Brian Chappell Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:20:24 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/10/google-reduces-pagerank-of-many-sites.html#comment-35026 "What I’d like to see next is a report on whether any of these sites have seen a reduction in Google traffic. After all, if it’s just a cosmetic reduction in PR, there’s no big deal." Your not the only one. Bring on the FUD! “What I’d like to see next is a report on whether any of these sites have seen a reduction in Google traffic. After all, if it’s just a cosmetic reduction in PR, there’s no big deal.”

Your not the only one. Bring on the FUD!

]]>